Self nomination Support --TeVe 08:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Stunning and beautiful --Ningyou 08:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support as per Ningyou. Thryduulf 10:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - MartinD 11:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support absolutely --Joonasl 12:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Ygrek 18:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support -- skINMATE 21:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Amazing photo -- Killeroy 00:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support great, great, great! --Pumbaa 00:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral nice picture, but overexposed sky behind the bridge MGo 06:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --che 12:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose It's a kind of charming, but it burns my eyes. Francisco M. Marzoa 16:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Wonderful. This is an incredible picture capturing the beauty of winter. I love this photo. NPPyzixBlan 17:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose I bet it makes a nice print but it is over exposed for a computer monitor. Miskatonic 17:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - MPF 23:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose ack Miskatonic Hein 18:26, 5 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 14:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --historicair 11:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support .El Comandante 00:00, 12 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support well done Pjotr 10:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --David tm 11:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Taka 14:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC) . Beautiful photo, but no encyclopedic value. It should not be in the wikipedia at all, but in a publication with artistic work.[ reply ]
that's the reason why it's on commons and not on en.wikipedia -- Gorgo 21:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
I believe it doesn't look bad as an illustrative photo —UED77 22:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
21 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral --> Featured Roger McLassus 18:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]