Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 18 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Iglesia_de_Santa_María,_Gdansk,_Polonia,_2013-05-20,_DD_12.jpg edit

 

File:Great_cormorant_(Phalacrocorax_carbo).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Farmoor Reservoir, Oxfordshire --Charlesjsharp 15:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose Good composition, but head is blurried and CAs IMO (see note)--Lmbuga 16:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
      Comment The unsharpness is only noticeable at very high magnification IMO, so perhaps someone else can say what they think. Can't see any worrying CAs. --Charlesjsharp 17:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
      Oppose blurry head, this nominator does not seem to have the same criteria with its images with the images from others he chose to decline, see his oppose of File:Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 01.jpg --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The head is not just simply unsharp, for me it seems, that there was a try to salvage parts of the bird by applying partial excessive sharpening and/or denoising. Finally, it does not look as it should look. And yes, I also do see the fringe. --Cccefalon 06:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

  Oppose Head is unsharp --Σπάρτακος 14:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 02:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

File:AEG-MIGNON-typewriter-02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination AEG Mignon typewriter without hood to expose the inside mechanic --Cccefalon 04:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support QI -- Spurzem 07:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree because of some presumed stacking flaws. See notes. Another turn with Helicon focus with different setting should solve the problem, IMO. See notes. --Hubertl 10:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
      Comment As usual, I ran Helicon with different settings and picked the best result. I agree, that it might be not suitable for FPC, but imo – considering the high resolution of 5,376 × 3,840 px - imo it is more than good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 11:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Despite this named small problem, it´s weak QI --Hubertl 08:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 02:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Stone_bridge_in_Taranto.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stone bridge in Taranto --Livioandronico2013 19:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose (For the moment). The illuminated (white) parts of the bridge are blown out. I think this can probably be repaired if you have the RAW file. You should reduce the white and/or the lights. The composition is nice, of course. --Code 13:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice! Overexposed (blown out) parts are irrelevant in size imo --Moroder 07:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 02:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Voigtlander_Bessa_I_(1951-1955)_-_Skopar_3,5-105_-_Prontor_S_-_05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Voigtlander, Bessa I (1951-1955) - lens Color Skopar 1:3,5/105 - Prontor S --Jmh2o 13:49, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry but for a studio work isn't enough....blurry and why f/24??? --Livioandronico2013 19:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough for a studio shot. Canvas not clean. Wrong whitebalance. --Cccefalon 08:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As Cccefalon--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 08:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 02:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ρέθυμνο 3112.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Street in Rethymno old town, after sunset. --C messier 17:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Yes, it's sunset. But IMO much problems with WB. --XRay 13:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
    I disagree it was a pink, very pink sunset and most of the houses are painted with warm colours. And I have raw for this and WB isssues maybe fixable. --C messier 17:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much magenta for me. -- Spurzem 09:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose pink sunset...mah --Livioandronico2013 18:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Cayambe 16:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)