Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 20 2021

Consensual review edit

File:St_George_church_in_St-Georges-les-Landes_(1).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination St George church in Saint-Georges-les-Landes, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 06:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Should be cropped IMO (see "Add a note"). --F. Riedelio 07:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Sorry, but composition is ok IMO. --Tournasol7 06:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The composition is OK for me, but the top of the building and the roof near left side of image are rather unsharp. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 19:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment I disagree, discuss please. --Tournasol7 05:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Composition is perfectly OK, IMO. Cross above the steeple is a little unsharp, but that's acceptable and the image is IMO clearly sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan --Moroder 03:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan --Trougnouf 09:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --LexKurochkin 09:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Yosemite_National_Park_(California,_USA),_Yosemite_Valley_--_2012_--_4634.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Yosemite Valley in Yosemite National Park, California, USA --XRay 05:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sufficiently sharp. Blue CA in the trees at top right. Sky is grainy. --Tagooty 05:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
    •   Done I just made some improvements. Hopefully it's good enough. --XRay 12:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose seems like a photo without a clear subject. --Kallerna 16:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Sometimes I have to puzzle. What kind of subject should be seen? --XRay 04:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Lens appears somewhat weak in the upper corners, but if you consider the image resolution, this is negligible. The image noise in the sky is also completely within the tolerable range. I really can't see any major flaws here that would justify a rejection. --Smial 12:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Jaritz --Moroder 03:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment It seems to need a perspective correction, most of the trees are leaning inwards. --Trougnouf 09:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Done Thank you. I've changed the perspective and cropped out most of the sky. --XRay 12:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support good quality imo, thank you --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --LexKurochkin 09:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)