Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Den_Haag_Centraal-1584.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View to the Central Station The Hague --Hubertl 07:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment See notes please --Livioandronico2013 08:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment thanks, Livioandronico2013, part removed! --Hubertl 12:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry no for now. The dust spot is still here, and the correction of the top left corner is disturbingly visible (a different blue circle).--Jebulon 16:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Thank you. Better.--Jebulon 21:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
      Done, @Jebulon: , Thanks for reviewing, I did it now with PS, not with LR. --Hubertl 17:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine now. --Palauenc05 17:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 21:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Singapore_High-rises-at-Marina-Bay-02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Singapore: Highrises at Marina Bay: OUE Bayfront, The Fullerton Bay Hotel, Change Alley Aerial Plaza and The Fullerton Pavilion --Cccefalon 02:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Water on the front have no structure and partly CA --Denkmalhelfer 17:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    I disagree: I cannot see any relevant CA. --Cccefalon 21:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI --Milseburg 14:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice photo despite the less-than-optimal light. Alvesgaspar 11:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Impressive image. I see no lack. -- Spurzem 19:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 22:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 09:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Calico Ghost Town 2012 (le sheriff).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Le village fantôme à Calico, près de Barstow, Californie du sud.(USA).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment could you brighten the dark areas and check, if you can remove the CA (see notes)? --Hubertl 08:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done. Thank you Hubertl for your note correction CA and brighten the dark areas.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment puhhhh! Have you seen the first version from November? I Don´t know really, why you darkened this one. I set it on Discuss, maybe I´m wrong. --Hubertl 18:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose to much shadow without CA --Denkmalhelfer 18:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't like the strong contrast and the composition. The man on the right is leaning because of lens distortion. Alvesgaspar 11:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 12:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Fürstliche_Gruft_für_Karl_Fugger_Babenhausen-5.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Neuromanischer Zentralbau in Kapellenform, Einfriedung mit Schmiedeeisengitter, von Leonhard Romeis und Jakob Raffler, 1889/90 --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 07:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Probably could have been cropped below but otherwise good --Daniel Case 21:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs perspective corrections before promotion IMO. The compo is not good for a QI (to be cropped below, indeed. Consensual review, please.--Jebulon 21:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
      Oppose not a good combo, frame cutted --Denkmalhelfer 18:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Jebulon it needs perspective correction.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As said above. --Palauenc05 10:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 11:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2009-05-31 Bonn-Endenich Schumannhaus Bueste (1).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Bust of Robert Schumann, Bonn, Germany (by Sir James).--Leit 09:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Below 4Mpix. Sorry --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Please don't apply this ominous rule before there is a real consensus about it which isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote. --LC-de 22:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Tobias "ToMar" Maier. --Code 18:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support ominous rule without real consensus. --Ralf Roletschek 19:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not because of the rule, which is not in force, but owing to the distracting background and blurred subject. Alvesgaspar 11:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 11:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2015-02-21_Samstag_am_Karmelitermarkt_Wien_-_9440.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Farmersmarket on a saturday at the Karmelitermarkt, Vienna --Hubertl 00:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} Both sides leaning out Poco a poco 09:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Done New, perspective correctioned version uploaded, Poco a poco.
      Support Looks fine to me now Poco a poco 20:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose crop bad with cut sign --Denkmalhelfer 17:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment The sign itself is not subject of this picture, Denkmalhelfer. Außerdem gilt in Deutschland Vermummungsverbot! --Hubertl 08:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CA. Saturation. -- Smial 10:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    •   Done CA korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis, Smial --Hubertl 11:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment CA now acceptable, but why has the new version now this reddish tint? Reds are partly oversaturated now. I don't understand. -- Smial (talk)
  •   Comment red-saturation reduced. Thanks a lot for your friendly suggestion. @Smial: --Hubertl 20:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support OK IMO. --C messier 15:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 21:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough. I like the composition but the photo looks slightly overexposed. A big dust spot near the upper left corner. Alvesgaspar 11:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Thanks, dustspot removed.--Hubertl 22:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 09:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Hondeghem Estaminet de l'ancienne maison commune.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hondeghem Estaminet de l'ancienne maison commune.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Touzrimounir 18:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Touzrimounir Can you give me the pleasure to motivate your opposition? Pierre and I do you'd be terribly grateful! Thanks --Livioandronico2013 18:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment A pic (4 608 × 3 456 pixels, taille du fichier : 11,73 Mio, type MIME : image/jpeg), corrected with RawTerapee ! Please, Touzrimounir I would be happy to know why it's Insuffisant quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Weak support The left part of the picture is blurry, perhaps may be cropped Ezarate 01:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment @ Ezarate thank you for your review. The left part croped, gives a pic too tight.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too noisy, tight crop. Alvesgaspar 11:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Alvesgaspar. --C messier 11:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:PlacaenEscuelaNormal.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Plaque infront of Escuela Normal, Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 21:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 08:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Could easily be taken with exactly frontal view, so distortion is not acceptable for me. --Uoaei1 18:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not symetric, bad for a such plate. --Denkmalhelfer 15:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)