Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 30 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Major_Somnath_Sharma_statue_at_Param_Yodha_Sthal_Delhi.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Major Somnath Sharma statue. --KCVelaga 05:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Double vote --Jakubhal 05:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp. --PtrQs 22:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurred --Jakubhal 05:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Not a close case, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 19:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Audi_e-tron_GT_concept,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS0763).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Audi e-tron GT concept at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 09:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline   SupportGood quality. --Arabsalam 10:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
      OpposeUnsharp and noisy --Cvmontuy 11:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose per Cvmontuy. -- Ikan Kekek 06:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   -- Seven Pandas 21:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Kbal_Chhay_Waterfall_05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Kbal Chhay Waterfall --Dmitry Makeev 06:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline   Support Good quality. --Arabsalam 07:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. unfavorable DOF, especially, if the waterfall is the subject here. --Milseburg 09:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose per Milseburg. Focus is on the children; waterfall is blurred and white water is blown. -- Ikan Kekek 07:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   -- Seven Pandas 21:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Porsche_911_2.0,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS0970).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Porsche 911 2.0 Coupé at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 07:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose Is not sharp --Cvmontuy 11:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose - I'm not sure about the sharpness of the car, but if it's sufficient, it was still photographed at an inopportune moment, as the half-people on the left are distracting. It's definitely challenging to get good photos at a convention or international show. -- Ikan Kekek 07:05, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   -- Seven Pandas 21:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Klasztor_Zgromadzenia_Sióstr_Maryi_Niepokalanej_w_Bardzie_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Monastery of the Congregation of the Sisters of Mary Immaculate in Bardo 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, absolute identic to the other nominated pic and dust spot in the right --Arabsalam 18:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Jakubhal 05:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality photo. If there is a dust spot it would be helpful if it can be pointed out with an 'add note' box so it can be fixed. --Acabashi 13:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I don't see any dust spots. The subject looks OK to me, but I really don't like the unsharp tree that's furthest to the left, so since that's distracting me, I am not supporting. -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Fischer.H 17:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   ---- Seven Pandas 21:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Gare_Pont_Veyle_Crottet_3.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Pont-de-Veyle train station located in Crottet, France. --Chabe01 21:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
      Support Good quality photo. Acabashi 23:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. Sharpness is good, but it need the perspective correction. --Tournasol7 06:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose Needs a vertical perspective correction --Michielverbeek 07:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine for me. --MB-one 23:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 19:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)