Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 01 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Neo-Riemannian Tonnetz.svg edit

 

  • Nomination The Neo-Riemannian Tonnetz, showing relations between triads --Mate2code 02:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • A useful image, however, the small annotations denoting secondary operations are too small to read except at higher res. Can you make them a larger font, or a darker grey?--Generic1139 12:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done The gray letters are now readable on the description page. In my opinion only the letters N, S and H need to be readable from articles, the gray letters are just auxiliary information. Mate2code 12:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Generic1139 16:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 05:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Burgruine Hohenegg 8666.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Burgruine Hohenegg, Austria --Hamster28 13:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much softening (fine details in the wall structure are extinguished). Magenta CA bottom right. --Cccefalon 13:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
      Support Sharpness and colours look just right to me. --Stegop 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
      OpposeThe softened details look nice, like a kind of drawing. Was it intentionally? As an artwork? Then describe it on the description page, and I give a "pro". If not and it should be a "normal" photo, I agree Cccefalon. -- DerFussi 14:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too processed, perhaps Featured picture, but not Quality Image IMO--Lmbuga 02:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC).
  •   Oppose too much noise reduction --Christian Ferrer 05:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 05:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)