Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 03 2014
-
- Nomination Sculpture dedicated to the volunteers. Sinking of the Prestige, San Vicente do Mar, O Grove, Galicia-002 --Lmbuga 00:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Famberhorst 04:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The rare Triumph 1800 Roadster from 1947 -- Spurzem 21:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chipmunk -- Senapa 21:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination VW 1302, built from 1970 to 1972 -- Spurzem 21:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stupas in the wall of the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 21:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline The wires in the foreground are really disturbing, you should have got closer to avoid them or use a longer focal distance --Poco a poco 21:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stupas in the wall of the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 21:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry: Poor quality: Poor detail, chromatic aberrations, Big areas overexposed. There are not vertical straight lines--Lmbuga 23:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Franz von Wirer, detail, Bad Ischl, Upper Austria --P e z i 20:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bruges, Belgium: Bakkersrei Canal with "The Haalve Maan Brewery" in the background --Cccefalon 18:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment Good for me but the vertical lines of the right are tilted CCW--Lmbuga 18:37, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Done --Cccefalon 20:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Bruges, Belgium: Bakkersrei Canal with "The Haalve Maan Brewery" in the background --Cccefalon 18:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ministers' cabinet room, Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 17:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment Good, but the vertical lines of the left are tilted (la promoveré aunque no la rectifiques, casi no se nota)--Lmbuga 18:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 19:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Ministers' cabinet room, Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 17:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tapu Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 17:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Famberhorst 18:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Souq Waqif, Doha, Qatar --Poco a poco 17:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hong Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 17:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Ho Chi Minh City from Bitexco Financial Tower, Vietnam --Poco a poco 17:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 18:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harley-Davidson motorcycles --Rjcastillo 17:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- Spurzem 18:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Port of A Illa de Arousa-10 --Lmbuga 17:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross, Cambados, Galicia, Spain-002 --Lmbuga 17:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross, Cambados, Galicia, Spain-003 --Lmbuga 17:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 rue des Arts --Archaeodontosaurus 16:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Famberhorst 17:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuggörarnas kapell (chapell) in the small fishing villages of Kuggörarna, Hudiksvall municipality (Sweden). --ArildV 15:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Famberhorst 17:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aegopodium podagraria. A dreaded (by root suckers) invasive plant in the Dutch gardens.
Famberhorst 15:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 19:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Aegopodium podagraria. A dreaded (by root suckers) invasive plant in the Dutch gardens.
-
- Nomination Olive Seller in Market - Tangier - Morocco. By User:Adam63. --Stegop 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn A little noisy, reasonable DOF and colors, might be ok. You need a personality rights tag, and geodata would be nice. --Generic1139 14:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Yet oversharpened, look at the skin. --Cccefalon 14:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes, you are correct. Backing off on the sharpening might help the noise problem as well, but maybe this one can't be saved. Nice concept, though. --Generic1139 14:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, jpg artifacts, noise, white balance, but nice composition and concept--Lmbuga 17:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
I think we're all in agreement here. Decline. --Generic1139 18:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
I agree with you all, but with that kind of exigence there won't be any QI's for this kind of subject. --Stegop 22:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 02 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 03 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Famberhorst 15:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 04 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 05 --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Illa de Arousa Village, Galicia (Spain)-09 --Lmbuga 10:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pylons. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 10:22, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Semporna, Sabah: A Frangipani (Plumeria rubra) blooming in middle of the Bajau water village (kampung air) in Semporna --Cccefalon 09:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Heppenheim, Kellereigasse 11 --Berthold Werner 08:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corvus Corax, Amphi festival 2014 --Atamari 08:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)< Comment To me the picture should be cropped (see note), because the person of the left is disturbing--Lmbuga 10:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Comment better after croping --Atamari 19:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination West Ham station. Mattbuck 06:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Multi-stemmed birch (Betula).
Famberhorst 04:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. Small area RGB255, but acceptable IMO --Cccefalon 06:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
* Question: What does RGB255?
Famberhorst 15:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Multi-stemmed birch (Betula).
-
- Nomination Facade detail of the Basilica of The Holy Blood in Bruges, Belgium --Cccefalon 04:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coupure canal, at the junction with Groenerei Canal (Bruges, Belgium) --Cccefalon 04:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Famberhorst 05:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view from Lasithi Plateau (Oropedio Lasithiou) in eastern Crete taken from the north-west road. By User:Meldianen --Stegop 22:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Severe stitching error. --Cccefalon 10:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC) --Cccefalon 10:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
You are right, withdrawn. --Stegop 04:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Dories --Stegop 22:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Insufficient resolution (QI requirement: 2 megapixels minimum) --Uoaei1 09:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
You are right, wrong photo, withdrawn. --Stegop 04:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ovoo. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 22:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion It would be QI if it wasn't tilted CCW (see houses on the bg) --Stegop 23:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
There is also an odd halo around the pan at the top of the center pole. --Generic1139 23:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Good quality, therefore QI --Hubertl 12:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Done You both were right, thanks for the hints. I uploaded new version, please taka a look again. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 23:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The halo is still there in many places. Did you use a mask to modify the sky - possibly noise reduction? The mask wasn't tight enough around that pan, and didn't include the gap in the yellow ribbon. There is the same issue on the far left above the hills, and there is a right angle white artifact in the first valley from the left. Doing the distortion correction has lost some of the good elements in the left of the pile - you might want to compromise there. --Generic1139 02:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Done Yes, I used a mask to modify the sky. I uploaded new, fixed version. Now image should be all right. --Halavar 09:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Santa Barbara, Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 16:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I guess it's QI, but although I admit that it is quite realistic, maybe a little more contrast would make it more attractive. --Stegop 23:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version with less brightness and a bit more of contrast Poco a poco 21:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moraca river, north of Podgorica, Montenegro --Poco a poco 16:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mirador Colomer --Taxiarchos228 12:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion A lot of dust spots in the upper part of the sky --Cccefalon 13:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Cccefalon: fixed now --Taxiarchos228 20:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leicester railway station. Mattbuck 06:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Ossenheim. --Hydro 17:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC) Both sides leaning in, and colours look oversaturated. --Kreuzschnabel 18:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Left side leaning in Poco a poco 18:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded an improved version. --Hydro 17:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Looks fine to me --Poco a poco 21:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination House in Ossenheim. --Hydro 17:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC) Both sides leaning in, and colours look oversaturated. --Kreuzschnabel 18:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A baby Biawak (juvenile Varanus Salvator) in a puddle of water in Kampung Sukau. Approximately size: 20 cm --Cccefalon 04:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Animals pictures needs complete identification, not only specie. Furthermore, two spots (I do not know the cause of the spots) are a bit disturbing (see note)--Lmbuga 18:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment The Biawak is too young for an identification. I fear, you have to decline then because even my malaysian contacts cannot determine the exact taxonomy. --Cccefalon 16:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hmmm, wait with the decline another two days, I wrote an email to my friend, who is director of Category:Bornean Sun Bear Conservation Centre. Biawak and Bear are not really similar, but as Wildlife Biologist, he might know an answer. --Cccefalon 16:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Done Added name, removed spots. Please Lmbuga, assess again. --Cccefalon 04:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Support Good quality --Lmbuga 09:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Young elephant in the Ayutthaya Elephant Camp, Ayutthaya, Thailand --Poco a poco 08:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment Distracting background or insufficient description. Either explain what this elephant is doing there or show a picture with less clutter around it. --Averater 10:00, 27 July 2014 (UTC) @Averater: please either decline because there is no way that this shot becomes QI or comment it if you are suggesting how it can get promoted. Poco a poco 10:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC) PD: I included though the category in the description of the file and here.
Ok. I still find the surrounding distracting but thanks for the categorization and description. --Averater 19:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Support The bg gives context and it doesn't bother me much; what it lacks in "artistic" it is compensated by the informative value. --Stegop 04:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Young elephant in the Ayutthaya Elephant Camp, Ayutthaya, Thailand --Poco a poco 08:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Souq Waqif, Doha, Qatar --Poco a poco 11:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings in Tung Chung, Hong Kong --Poco a poco 11:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality and beautiful composition. --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adršpach-Teplice Rocks 02 --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Stegop 13:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adršpach-Teplice Rocks 03 --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Stegop 13:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adršpach-Teplice Rocks 08 --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Tilted to the right. --Halavar 00:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Photo done using a spirit level photo, so surely there is no tilt --Jacek Halicki 12:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Support IMO, it's QI. --Stegop 13:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adršpach-Teplice Rocks 10--Jacek Halicki 13:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me--Lmbuga 12:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Grosmont railway station MMB 13 92214.jpg edit
- Nomination Cock o the North at Grosmont. Mattbuck 07:04, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn No QI for me --Livioandronico2013 20:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment I consider unacceptable to decline without express causes: "Discuss". Too strong shadows IMO, I don't like the composition--Lmbuga 12:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
do not take it so, I wanted to say the same things that you said --Livioandronico2013 20:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
You're right, nto QI. Mattbuck 09:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Nice rainbow though. --Kreuzschnabel 10:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
File:University of East London MMB 03 Royal Albert Dock.jpg edit
- Nomination Royal Albert Dock. Mattbuck 06:37, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Non-existent subject, negligible EV. Yerpo 14:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Not a reason to decline at quality images. --Mattbuck 23:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC) - Yes it is, see Commons:Image guidelines#Quality and featured photographic images. Even without this formality, the photo is extremely average, not sure what quality it's supposed to have. Sorry. --Yerpo 07:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The subject here is water. I dont think the photograph shows water in a good way. Neither weather, choice of lens, or the choice of angle is adequate for the purpose. There are strong reflections, limited DOF and perspective distortion (partially because of the choice of angle, especially the upper right corner that is furthest away from the camera). I'm sorry if I'm wrong, but to me it seems to be random snapshot. --ArildV 08:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with comments above. --Iifar 10:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per ArildV. --Lewis Hulbert 15:43, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose no quality image for me --Atamari (talk) 13:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Hydrangea macrophylla 005.JPG edit
- Nomination Hydrangea macrophylla, with flattened umbels.
Famberhorst 15:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Too processed (see note as example)--Lmbuga 19:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment I think that the shadow of the large leaves.
Famberhorst 04:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps I'm not right: "Discuss" is better--Lmbuga 19:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose At first sight it is very good, but looking carefully at the full resolution I find the DOF inadequate, as only some parts of the pethals are sharp - IMO some of the centres should be sharp. --Stegop 13:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Adansonia digitata_arbre_MHNT.jpg edit
- Nomination , arbre of Baobab - arbre de Baobab --Ercé 13:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment A little bit more contrast wouldn't hurt and that sky is kind of dull, but since I suspect that it is very realistic, maybe it is QI. --Stegop 00:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done New version. --Ercé 11:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose CA, strange colours, blurry bottom. Mattbuck 16:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done OK ! New new version. --Ercé 13:22, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Ok good now --Archaeodontosaurus 14:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Stegop 23:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI for me --Halavar 11:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Club_Alpino_Italiano_sign_at_the_Langkofelhütte.jpg edit
- Nomination Club Alpino Italiano sign at the Langkofelhütte in Val Gardena --Moroder 15:47, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Corners of the plaque are blurred. --Mattbuck 17:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree, sensless review --Moroder 22:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Have a look at the rock above the eagle, around the rusty dots. There’s definitely motion blur visible, resulting either from earthquake or camera shake. (I reckon that’s the price of high resolution.) --Kreuzschnabel 11:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It must be me with Parkinson's even at shutter speed 1/500 --Moroder 14:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment No need for Parkinson’s. Working with "only" 16 Mpix systems, I choose 1/2000 or even 1/4000 to get a real crisp sharp image (unless using a tripod of course). Natural hand movement is not too small to blur several pixels at 1/500. --Kreuzschnabel 10:56, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It must be me with Parkinson's even at shutter speed 1/500 --Moroder 14:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Have a look at the rock above the eagle, around the rusty dots. There’s definitely motion blur visible, resulting either from earthquake or camera shake. (I reckon that’s the price of high resolution.) --Kreuzschnabel 11:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree, sensless review --Moroder 22:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Vientiane - Wat Chan - 0011.jpg edit
- Nomination Prayer hall at Wat Chan, Vientiane, Laos -- DerFussi 21:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Heavy noise reduction caused much loss of details. There are also strange halos in the image. There may be perspective problems too. Wrongly processed, otherwise a very nice image. --Joydeep 16:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
CommentI should not work at night after a bottle of wine... It was the Smart Sharpen Filter in Photoshop, that apllied a heavy noise reduction partly, not the processing - unfortunately not at the spots I checked. Normally I am not a fan of heavy noise reduction. Do I have any chance with a re-upload? Are there perspective problems or not? Can you give me a hint where? I used some guide lines to check it. -- DerFussi 17:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
You can surely reupload another version of this file. Sharper version would be very good. There are minor perspective issues, I have made some annotations. --Joydeep 19:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I've checked the perspective issues. Look at my screenshots [1],[2] and [3]. Thats very slighty. Maybe 1,5px on the left side, if you look at 300%. OK. I'll kick the smart sharpen filter and rework it tonight. Upload a new one anyway and will decide whether its good enough - and never work at late night. Thanks. -- DerFussi 04:32, 22 July 2014 (UTC)<bɾ /> Done reworked -- DerFussi 20:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment There are several optical illusions working against you here, the curved item over the central peak, the central columns get narrower as they go up, the wires crossing at an angle, and the left front wall's horizontal tilts, even though the vertical there is mostly vertical. Sharpness is improved, though. --Generic1139 21:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, it is a bit tricky. If I wanted to put it on my wall here, I would retouch it and remove all wires, but I lack in time. The QI is not a must have. I consider it as a part of a learning process, not as a contest. :) Thanks for the comments. -- DerFussi 08:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Ascensor del Monte San Pedro.005 - A Coruña.jpg edit
- Nomination Elevator in San Pedro's Mount, in Corunna, Spain. --Drow male 13:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment See note: Red and cyan CAs. Overxposed areas? If you fix the CAs, it's good for me--Lmbuga 14:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment If you can't fix the chromatic aberrations, I can fix CAs, but I don't have the RAW file--Lmbuga 15:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
* Done by me. New version: Discuss--Lmbuga 01:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC) - Support QI now imo --Lewis Hulbert 21:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)