Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 08 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Palazzo_Bevilacqua_(corso_Santa_Anastasia).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Facade of the building "palazzo Bevilacqua" in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 12:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The artefacts should be reduced. --Ermell 13:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO OK. --XRay 11:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overexposed, burnt clouds, colour channel clipping. --Smial 11:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Smial is right, but imo, considering present standards, enough for QI. --Nefronus 20:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 10:34, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Cox's_Bazaar_Sunset_Sep2019.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sunset at Cox's Bazar Beach -- Mehedi Abedin 8:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose The horizon should be aligned and the noise reduced. --Ermell 13:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I agree, but why is this in CR? -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

File:20180512_B-1B_Lancer_Dyess_AFB_Air_Show_2018_44.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A B-1B Lancer at the Dyess AFB Air Show in May 2018. --Balon Greyjoy 06:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. Need to be a bit sharpen --Wilfredor 23:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. The airplane is not sharp. --Steindy 00:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
      Oppose Not sharp enough. --Zinnmann 07:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
      Oppose Per above + there is too little space where the plane is heading. --Nefronus 20:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)