Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 03 2017

Consensual review edit

File:CongresodelaNacionArgentina-nov2017.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Palace of the Argentine National Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 12:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   SupportVery nice. PumpkinSky 13:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   OpposeToo dark --Jacek Halicki 18:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done Ezarate 20:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Jacek Halicki 14:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Seems good enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Seehof_mit_Kaskaden.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View at Seehof castle with cascades in the front --Ermell 07:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Smial 12:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Ermell 13:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support--Jacek Halicki 22:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment The first version had lots of sharpening artifacts, bad crop, and strong banding in the sky. It would have been fair to mention that a new version has been uploaded after my vote. New version is acceptable for me. --Smial 08:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
    • Sorry Smial that's true, of course. After your justified criticism, I first noticed the bugs and created and uploaded a new version. Thanks for your evaluation anyway, it helped me and the picture.--Ermell 11:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support--Armenak Margarian 20:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

File:OH674 1.jpg edit

 

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Ikan Kekek 07:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Готель_«Слов’янський»,_Черкаси.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hotel'vSlovianskyi', Cherkasy, Ukraine. By User:SNCH --Ahonc 01:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Beautiful building, but does this photo require perspective correction? -- Ikan Kekek 09:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree - Per Ikan --Jacek Halicki 19:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective should be corrected.--Ermell 14:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 11:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Eingangsportal_Kirche_Seukendorf;_Kirchhofmauer.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Eingangsportal Kirche Seukendorf; Kirchhofmauer --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good enough. PumpkinSky 12:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree - monuent is cuted --Jacek Halicki 19:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Poor composition.--Peulle 07:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Peulle.--Ermell 14:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Bad crop, overexposed, burnt sky. --Smial 16:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Guys, title is portal. The monument is an other image.... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
In that case, disturbing foreground object. ;) In any case, the composition is lacking, IMO.--Peulle 22:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 11:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)