Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 05 2014

< Commons:Quality images candidates
  • * Nomination Wooden figure from Indonesia --Hubertl 00:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Great quality. Jakec 01:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wooden figure from Indonesia --Hubertl 00:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Great quality. Jakec 01:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lavandula lanata --Tsui 22:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 01:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lavandula lanata --Tsui 22:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 01:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lavandula angustifolia --Tsui 22:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 01:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lavandula angustifolia --Tsui 22:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 01:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vjosa river --Pudelek 21:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vjosa river --Pudelek 21:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Our Lady of the Snows, la Virgen de las Nieves, Sierra Nevada, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 20:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Our Lady of the Snows, la Virgen de las Nieves, Sierra Nevada, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 20:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Landscape of Granada Province, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 20:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Sky might be dnoised, but it's OK as a QI. --Halavar 20:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Landscape of Granada Province, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 20:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Sky might be dnoised, but it's OK as a QI. --Halavar 20:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A maya plate.--Jebulon 19:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Question this plate was inside a glass cabinet? --Hubertl 20:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Yes, it was.--Jebulon 20:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Hubertl 01:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination A maya plate.--Jebulon 19:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Question this plate was inside a glass cabinet? --Hubertl 20:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Yes, it was.--Jebulon 20:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
      Good quality. --Hubertl 01:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination La Herradura, Parasol, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 19:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Poor composition and poor detail. Blurred and not interesting IMO, sorry. Poor DOF IMO. No whole object. Poor composition IMO--Lmbuga 22:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Dear User:Lmbuga, no need to write twice "pour composition", one is enough for my poor understanding ! "Not interesting" ? It is irrelevant in QIC ! We should have many and many "decline" here if it was a criterium for QI 😃😃!! A lot of pictures here are completely "not interesting" right ?--Jebulon 00:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination La Herradura, Parasol, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 19:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Poor composition and poor detail. Blurred and not interesting IMO, sorry. Poor DOF IMO. No whole object. Poor composition IMO--Lmbuga 22:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Dear User:Lmbuga, no need to write twice "pour composition", one is enough for my poor understanding ! "Not interesting" ? It is irrelevant in QIC ! We should have many and many "decline" here if it was a criterium for QI 😃😃!! A lot of pictures here are completely "not interesting" right ?--Jebulon 00:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination La Herradura, horizon, hobbie cat, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 19:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination La Herradura, horizon, hobbie cat, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 19:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panoramic view of the old city of Dubrovnik, Croatia --Poco a poco 19:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panoramic view of the old city of Dubrovnik, Croatia --Poco a poco 19:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Waterfall Dynjandi, Vestfirðir, Iceland --Poco a poco 19:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Quizás la parte superior pudiese tener más claridad y/o contraste, but  Support very good picture IMO--Lmbuga 19:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Waterfall Dynjandi, Vestfirðir, Iceland --Poco a poco 19:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Quizás la parte superior pudiese tener más claridad y/o contraste, but  Support very good picture IMO--Lmbuga 19:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gniezno Cathedral, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 19:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gniezno Cathedral, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 19:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Railway station. Sukhumi, Abkhazia, Georgia. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Railway station. Sukhumi, Abkhazia, Georgia. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Railway station. Sukhumi, Abkhazia, Georgia. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. (A little bit noise, but OK.) --XRay 17:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Railway station. Sukhumi, Abkhazia, Georgia. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. (A little bit noise, but OK.) --XRay 17:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Railway station. Sukhumi, Republic of Abkhazia. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Comment Please, good picture, but see the vertical lines, in my opinion they are a bit tilted CCW. A bit of noise. What you think?--Lmbuga 19:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 20:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Tank you--Lmbuga 22:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Railway station. Sukhumi, Republic of Abkhazia. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Comment Please, good picture, but see the vertical lines, in my opinion they are a bit tilted CCW. A bit of noise. What you think?--Lmbuga 19:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 20:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. Tank you--Lmbuga 22:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sveti Stefan, Montenegro. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sveti Stefan, Montenegro. --Halavar 17:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Trees Group to cycle to Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). East. Famberhorst 16:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Nice picture --Hubertl 18:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Trees Group to cycle to Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). East.
      Famberhorst 16:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Nice picture --Hubertl 18:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bike lane bridge in Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) to Joure. Famberhorst 16:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bike lane bridge in Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) to Joure.
      Famberhorst 16:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Detail of a gravestone ; picture of Jesus' Sacred Heart from Saint Marguerite Marie Alacoque (1647-1690), graveyard of Saint-Pierre d'Exideuil, Vienne, France. --JLPC 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Detail of a gravestone ; picture of Jesus' Sacred Heart from Saint Marguerite Marie Alacoque (1647-1690), graveyard of Saint-Pierre d'Exideuil, Vienne, France. --JLPC 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panorama, from S-SW, of the country village of Edon, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panorama, from S-SW, of the country village of Edon, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Plaque i.m. soldiers killed during WW I, on the war memorial of Saint-Pierre d'Exideuil, Vienne, France. --JLPC 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Plaque i.m. soldiers killed during WW I, on the war memorial of Saint-Pierre d'Exideuil, Vienne, France. --JLPC 16:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Professor Nikolay Nepeivoda, mathematician, from Pereslavl. --PereslavlFoto 16:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Professor Nikolay Nepeivoda, mathematician, from Pereslavl. --PereslavlFoto 16:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Research Center for Buddhist Art Materials of Nara National Museum --663highland 14:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Research Center for Buddhist Art Materials of Nara National Museum --663highland 14:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ako Marine Science Museum --663highland 14:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ako Marine Science Museum --663highland 14:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination An abandoned village hospice (Fong Bin Yuen), Tai O, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. --Mk2010 14:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Decline A lot of magenta CA. Perspective not done. Despite f/11 not very sharp. Not a QI for me --Cccefalon 15:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination An abandoned village hospice (Fong Bin Yuen), Tai O, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. --Mk2010 14:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline A lot of magenta CA. Perspective not done. Despite f/11 not very sharp. Not a QI for me --Cccefalon 15:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 12:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building Facade in Hong Kong --The Photographer 10:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Ok for QI, just barely! Please check the usage and practice of ISO settings. Second opinion appreciated! --Hubertl 11:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building Facade in Hong Kong --The Photographer 10:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Ok for QI, just barely! Please check the usage and practice of ISO settings. Second opinion appreciated! --Hubertl 11:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panorama of São Paulo Center --The Photographer 10:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality. Extreme noise, I can´t understand this with this sufficient light situation --Hubertl 11:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panorama of São Paulo Center --The Photographer 10:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. Extreme noise, I can´t understand this with this sufficient light situation --Hubertl 11:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality for a single shot. --Hubertl 15:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality for a single shot. --Hubertl 15:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of the Assumption in Przecław 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Comment. Very disturbing shadow. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 18:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Przecław 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
       Comment. Very disturbing shadow. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 18:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of the Assumption in Przecław 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Przecław 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of the Assumption in Przecław 3 --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Przecław 3 --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bartosz Głowacki monument in Tarnów --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bartosz Głowacki monument in Tarnów --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sari. --Yann 09:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sari. --Yann 09:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The grand stand in Stadium Merdeka. --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 09:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The grand stand in Stadium Merdeka. --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 09:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Tun Sambanthan Monorail Station --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Tun Sambanthan Monorail Station --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Monorail train approaching MR2 Tun Sambanthan Monorail Station --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Monorail train approaching MR2 Tun Sambanthan Monorail Station --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Methodist 1 & 2 Brickfields Girl Primary School in front of the skyline of "Kuala Lumpur Sentral" --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Methodist 1 & 2 Brickfields Girl Primary School in front of the skyline of "Kuala Lumpur Sentral" --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kudat, Malaysia: Anglican Church St. Paul Sin San --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kudat, Malaysia: Anglican Church St. Paul Sin San --Cccefalon 07:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Saint Veit Chapel (Wernburg, Thuringia, Germany). --Code 06:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Saint Veit Chapel (Wernburg, Thuringia, Germany). --Code 06:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lasioglossum calceatum on Eschscholzia californica by --Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Primarly for the composition, not for sharpness --Hubertl 11:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lasioglossum calceatum on Eschscholzia californica by --Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Primarly for the composition, not for sharpness --Hubertl 11:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Allianz Arena, Munich, Germany by --Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Figurine with waterfall in the varenhof. The location Kruidhof. Famberhorst 05:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Figurine with waterfall in the varenhof. The location Kruidhof.
      Famberhorst 05:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rosa 'Madame Isaac Pereire'. Location De Kruidhof. Famberhorst 05:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rosa 'Madame Isaac Pereire'. Location De Kruidhof.
      Famberhorst 05:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View from Tioga Pass. --King of Hearts 05:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination View from Tioga Pass. --King of Hearts 05:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Silhouette of lifeguard stand. --King of Hearts 05:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Silhouette of lifeguard stand. --King of Hearts 05:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Point Mugu. --King of Hearts 05:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Very very good --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Viktorkirmes in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Viktorkirmes in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mother of God at the Holy Cross chapel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mother of God at the Holy Cross chapel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ponte Palatino, Rome, Italy --XRay 04:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ponte Palatino, Rome, Italy --XRay 04:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Neue Burg, Heldenplatz, Vienna, --Hubertl 02:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)I'm not sure about the file description ("Doppeladler"?)--Jebulon 20:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Neue Burg, Heldenplatz, Vienna, --Hubertl 02:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)I'm not sure about the file description ("Doppeladler"?)--Jebulon 20:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Decorative plate, Gombocz-collection, Radkersburg, Styria --Hubertl 02:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Decorative plate, Gombocz-collection, Radkersburg, Styria --Hubertl 02:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination chemin de la Guérite, cimetière du Père-Lachaise. --Coyau 19:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination chemin de la Guérite, cimetière du Père-Lachaise. --Coyau 19:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Grave --Coyau 19:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Grave --Coyau 19:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ilex aquifolium. --Coyau 19:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC) * Decline Quality ok, but the composition is strange. Its primarly a tree. --Hubertl 11:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC) That's what is interesting about this grave: there is a tree in it.--Coyau 17:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ilex aquifolium. --Coyau 19:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline Quality ok, but the composition is strange. Its primarly a tree. --Hubertl 11:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
      That's what is interesting about this grave: there is a tree in it.--Coyau 17:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Details of the Neuschwanstein Castle, Füssen, Germany --Poco a poco 18:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Perspective correction necessary. Also some slight magenta CA left and right side. --Cccefalon 21:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC) This is a tricky one, not all verticals here (specially the towers) are parallel among themselves. I gave it a try Poco a poco 22:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Well done! Sorry for the delay - it happened yesterday that everytime I loaded this photo, my firefox crashed. --Cccefalon 22:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Details of the Neuschwanstein Castle, Füssen, Germany --Poco a poco 18:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Perspective correction necessary. Also some slight magenta CA left and right side. --Cccefalon 21:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
      This is a tricky one, not all verticals here (specially the towers) are parallel among themselves. I gave it a try Poco a poco 22:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
      Well done! Sorry for the delay - it happened yesterday that everytime I loaded this photo, my firefox crashed. --Cccefalon 22:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panoramic View of La Asunción Montain Matasiete --The Photographer 17:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  SupportNice picture. --Ruthven 10:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panoramic View of La Asunción Montain Matasiete --The Photographer 17:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  SupportNice picture. --Ruthven 10:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Domaine départemental de Restinclières --Christian Ferrer 18:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Comment : only one slight problem. See note please. --JLPC 18:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Done I think --Christian Ferrer 13:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC) OK now. --JLPC 16:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Domaine départemental de Restinclières --Christian Ferrer 18:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Comment : only one slight problem. See note please. --JLPC 18:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)✓ Done I think --Christian Ferrer 13:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
      OK now. --JLPC 16:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Plakias Bay, Crete --Uoaei1 18:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Incredible sharpness for this lens! --Hubertl 16:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Plakias Bay, Crete --Uoaei1 18:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Incredible sharpness for this lens! --Hubertl 16:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Agios Nikolaos chapel in Kotsifou Canyon, Crete --Uoaei1 18:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Agios Nikolaos chapel in Kotsifou Canyon, Crete --Uoaei1 18:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Streetlight with padlocks bridge milvio --Livioandronico2013 09:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Oké.--Famberhorst 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Streetlight with padlocks bridge milvio --Livioandronico2013 09:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Oké.--Famberhorst 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Berenschot's Watermolen, Winterswijk, Netherlands --XRay 05:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support The quality is OK for me, but I must say, too bad that you cut the upper side of the waterwheel. --Hockei 18:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Berenschot's Watermolen, Winterswijk, Netherlands --XRay 05:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support The quality is OK for me, but I must say, too bad that you cut the upper side of the waterwheel. --Hockei 18:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination On the grounds of Natuerlebnisraumes Itzequelle Itzehoe --Nightflyer 23:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 01:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination On the grounds of Natuerlebnisraumes Itzequelle Itzehoe --Nightflyer 23:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 01:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A flowering Jacaranda tree in Lisbon, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 15:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion *  Comment vertically distorted. Please repair, its a good picture. --Hubertl 15:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality, the distortion is not detectable--Lmbuga 20:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination A flowering Jacaranda tree in Lisbon, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 15:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion *  Comment vertically distorted. Please repair, its a good picture. --Hubertl 15:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
      Good quality, the distortion is not detectable--Lmbuga 20:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tree of Culture, Kryvyi rih, Ukraine (by --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose The tree as the main subject should be sharper. Not QI for me, sorry. --Hockei 17:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tree of Culture, Kryvyi rih, Ukraine (by --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose The tree as the main subject should be sharper. Not QI for me, sorry. --Hockei 17:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Saint Barbara church in Chrostkowo, Poland --1bumer 16:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Sharp and good exposure. --Ram-Man 02:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Saint Barbara church in Chrostkowo, Poland --1bumer 16:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Sharp and good exposure. --Ram-Man 02:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kleine Binsenjungfer - Lestes virens vestalis, junges Männchen (young male) --Hockei 16:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Acceptable quality. --Ram-Man 02:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kleine Binsenjungfer - Lestes virens vestalis, junges Männchen (young male) --Hockei 16:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Acceptable quality. --Ram-Man 02:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kleine Binsenjungfer - Lestes virens vestalis, junges Männchen (young male) --Hockei 16:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Acceptable quality. --Ram-Man 02:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kleine Binsenjungfer - Lestes virens vestalis, junges Männchen (young male) --Hockei 16:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Acceptable quality. --Ram-Man 02:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Apple, type Fuji. By User:Superbass --Achim Raschka 15:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion The foreground seems.. unsharp? I think its ok, but if someone else has a different thought, move to CR. --Ram-Man 02:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Apple, type Fuji. By User:Superbass --Achim Raschka 15:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion The foreground seems.. unsharp? I think its ok, but if someone else has a different thought, move to CR. --Ram-Man 02:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Apple, type Wellant. By User:Superbass --Achim Raschka 15:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ram-Man 02:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Yellow Iris --Ram-Man 03:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Yellow Iris --Ram-Man 03:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: The gold medal game of the European American Football Championship 2014 was decided on the 7th of July at Ernst-Happel-Stadion in Vienna. Germany won over Austria 30-27 by AleXXw --Hubertl 03:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: The gold medal game of the European American Football Championship 2014 was decided on the 7th of July at Ernst-Happel-Stadion in Vienna. Germany won over Austria 30-27 by AleXXw
      --Hubertl 03:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination Steyr-Daimler-Puch 500. --Dnalor 01 21:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC) (UTC) * Decline Needs brightening and denoising. Also slight magenta CA left side. --Cccefalon 22:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)  Oppose. Very bad lighting and bad perspective for this nice car. Both will not be correctable. Sorry. -- Spurzem 09:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Ehm...Spurzem. What's happ? --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Steyr-Daimler-Puch 500. --Dnalor 01 21:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC) (UTC)
    • Decline Needs brightening and denoising. Also slight magenta CA left side. --Cccefalon 22:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
       Oppose. Very bad lighting and bad perspective for this nice car. Both will not be correctable. Sorry. -- Spurzem 09:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
      Ehm...Spurzem. What's happ? --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mountains in Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 00:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mountains in Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 00:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination At Lake Oshidori --663highland 00:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination At Lake Oshidori --663highland 00:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination At Lake Kuttara --663highland 00:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose nice at low resolution but lack of fine details at full, sorry --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination At Lake Kuttara --663highland 00:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose nice at low resolution but lack of fine details at full, sorry --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Three Saints Church (Chernivtsi). Ceiling paintings of the Seminar church (1870, painters: Yobst, Buchevsky, the monument of architecture of national significance №778/3). This is a part of the complex metropolitan residence of Bukovina and Dalmatia, which is listed in the UNESCO World Heritage List. By User:Klymenkoy --Ahonc 00:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Pretty noisy. --Cccefalon 09:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC) Yes it is, but I'm not sure it can be removed. I had a go myself but it wasn't an improvement. Nethertheless I  Support this image as an exceptional photo. Mattbuck 19:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Shifting to green (I don't know if it should be CR). It is quite noisy, but given the size and the nice light and composition, it's ok for QI imo. --Kadellar 16:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Three Saints Church (Chernivtsi). Ceiling paintings of the Seminar church (1870, painters: Yobst, Buchevsky, the monument of architecture of national significance №778/3). This is a part of the complex metropolitan residence of Bukovina and Dalmatia, which is listed in the UNESCO World Heritage List. By User:Klymenkoy --Ahonc 00:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Pretty noisy. --Cccefalon 09:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
      Yes it is, but I'm not sure it can be removed. I had a go myself but it wasn't an improvement. Nethertheless I  Support this image as an exceptional photo. Mattbuck 19:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
      Shifting to green (I don't know if it should be CR). It is quite noisy, but given the size and the nice light and composition, it's ok for QI imo. --Kadellar 16:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kongensbro, view from the brigde upstreams Gudenå --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Comment Nice, but strong chromatic noise at bottom (see notes). Vertical lines with chromatic noise (see note)--Lmbuga 22:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)  Done I have attempted to fix CA Villy Fink Isaksen 19:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Could you paint out the bird and brighten it please? Mattbuck 18:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)  Done bird away and more light. --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 14:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kongensbro, view from the brigde upstreams Gudenå --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Comment Nice, but strong chromatic noise at bottom (see notes). Vertical lines with chromatic noise (see note)--Lmbuga 22:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done I have attempted to fix CA Villy Fink Isaksen 19:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
      Could you paint out the bird and brighten it please? Mattbuck 18:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done bird away and more light. --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
       Support QI for me--Lmbuga 14:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Zlatko Junuzović, player of the Austria national football team. --Steindy 01:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion IMO, you should chose one...--Jebulon 14:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC) And why should I chose one? This is a completely different photo and it's not about COM:VI. --Steindy 12:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC) This is alright for me (this is a noticeably different photo), so I'm going to promote as there is no explicit oppose. --Ram-Man 04:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Zlatko Junuzović, player of the Austria national football team. --Steindy 01:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion IMO, you should chose one...--Jebulon 14:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
      And why should I chose one? This is a completely different photo and it's not about COM:VI. --Steindy 12:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
      This is alright for me (this is a noticeably different photo), so I'm going to promote as there is no explicit oppose. --Ram-Man 04:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Zlatko Junuzović, player of the Austria national football team. --Steindy 01:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC) * Withdrawn Please denoise the background, and crop out the hand, then I'll support.--Jebulon 14:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment 1. With ISO 1600 granularity is visible. This is perfectly normal. 2. Why should I distort my pictures? My photos are originals night the motto "what you see is what you get". It's about photos, not about who can use Photoshop or other programs better. Retouched photos have no encyclopedic value. --Steindy 12:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Not Doing per Jebulon --Ram-Man 04:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gobi Desert landscape. Dornogovi Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 10:47, 22 November 2014 (UTC) It is quite good, but at full res it looks a bit weird - perhaps a little overprocessed (colors, sharpening, NR)? -- Slaunger 20:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion It was shot at ISO 400 for some reason, but despite that it still looks good enough to me, even at 100%. --Ram-Man 04:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gobi Desert landscape. Dornogovi Province, Mongolia. --Halavar 10:47, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
      It is quite good, but at full res it looks a bit weird - perhaps a little overprocessed (colors, sharpening, NR)? -- Slaunger 20:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion It was shot at ISO 400 for some reason, but despite that it still looks good enough to me, even at 100%. --Ram-Man 04:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Merddin Emrys at Blaenau Ffestiniog. Mattbuck 07:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Nice photo but a bit too dark for me. -- Spurzem 12:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC) Brightened slightly, but it wasn't a sunny day. Mattbuck 16:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. The brightness on this is fine now. --Ram-Man 04:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Merddin Emrys at Blaenau Ffestiniog. Mattbuck 07:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Nice photo but a bit too dark for me. -- Spurzem 12:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
      Brightened slightly, but it wasn't a sunny day. Mattbuck 16:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
      Good quality. The brightness on this is fine now. --Ram-Man 04:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review edit

File:2014_Tarnobrzeg,_Zamek_Tarnowskich_03.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Dzikovia Castle in Tarnobrzeg 1 --Jacek Halicki 12:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
    @Jacek Halicki: First remove the 2 dust spots (see my notes). Also the left side is leaning in. I will revert to "green" afterwards. --Cccefalon 16:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
  Done--Jacek Halicki 21:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Now it's perfect for me, too. Back to "promote". --Cccefalon 21:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Cráter_Eldborg,_Vesturland,_Islandia,_2014-08-14,_DD_031.JPG edit

  • Nomination Eldborg crater, Versurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 18:32, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good --The Photographer 18:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)  Oppose a bit blurred IMO --Christian Ferrer 12:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

  Oppose Sorry Diego per Christian Ferrer --Livioandronico2013 11:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Livioandronico2013 11:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Rome_(IT),_Monumento_a_Vittorio_Emanuele_II_--_2013_--_3456.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Monumento a Vittorio Emanuele II, Rome, Italy --XRay 06:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Good quality. Very nice view. --Smial 15:20, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Back to blue, XRay, can you brighten dark areas, they're much too dark. --Kadellar 10:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now.--XRay 16:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Mmmm maybe I didn't explain myself, you have changed WB, but dark parts and the sky are still dark imo. I'm taking it to CR so more people can give their opinion. --Kadellar 17:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Fixed Fixed. Difficult. Parts of the stone are ver bright, other parts very dark. IMO now that's the best way for this image.--XRay 09:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you, ok now. --Kadellar 12:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria vs. Russia 20141115 (010).jpg edit

 

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Sterculia fruit.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sterculia guttata fruit --Vengolis 17:30, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Support Good quality. --0x010C 17:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC) --   Oppose Depth of field too shallow, too much noise affecting detail. Alvesgaspar 18:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
      strong oppose As Alvesgaspar. Lack of detail, nothing in focus IMO. CAs... poor quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Per Lmbuga  --Livioandronico2013 21:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Oddly, I find this whole thing acceptable except for the very odd haloing around everything. It's visible even in the thumbnails. Ram-Man 03:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Ram-Man: He is new to QIC; but has some good tools and resources. I noticed he is using the auto mode. May be some good advice will help him to improve. Jkadavoor 07:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality at all. --Steindy 21:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very interesting shot but most of it is unsharp, DoF too shallow. I don’t like the haloing and posterization on the edges too. Digitally refocused? --Kreuzschnabel 20:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Trostburg_Waidbruck_North_face_detail.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The castle Trostburg in Waidbruck, South Tyrol - North face --Moroder 17:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Summertime as its best! --Hubertl 18:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Halo. I wish another opinion, please.--Jebulon 20:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment The halo is not an artifact, it is there in reality you can see it with your naked eye so why should I take it away, please answer my questions. --Moroder 12:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    •   CommentArtifact or not, I see a halo, and I find this is disturbing. That is why CR exists. Please don't try intimidation with me, we both are too old for that. And I have no problem if some here think it is a QI. 5/1? Ok, it is a QI, that's the majority rule.--Jebulon 21:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
      •   Comment Why halo ? Because the photographer is facing the sun, of course... Nothing extraordinary here. Wrong moment of the day, that's all.--Jebulon 13:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI. --P e z i 14:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support As I said yesterday. Good quality.--Hubertl 19:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me. Yann 09:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:57, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Вітряк_Гейсиха.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Дерев'яний вітряк кін. XIX ст., село Гейсиха, при в'їзді в село. By User:Se Plakho --Ahonc 11:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion The windmill is out of focus, otherwise I liked the picture, sorry. --Ruthven 12:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree. How will you get a focus within a fog? --Hubertl 14:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    Maybe that's the difficulty of photographing thorough the fog. Another opinion is then welcome. --Ruthven 09:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support This picture works for me. Ram-Man 03:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No doubt that it's a really nice picture. However, I don't think that it meets the QI criteria. It's simply not sharp. Looks a little bit like a camera shake. --Code 13:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Quality is ok. As I wrote above, seeking sharpness inside the mist is contradictory.--Hubertl 13:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Pickering railway station MMB 01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pickering railway station. Mattbuck 08:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion A little underexposed and I think that white balance should be adjusted as well. --Ruthven 12:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree the decline, but I agree with the lighten up. WB is ok, I think. --Hubertl 02:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    The image has been lightened up; now we need a final opinion --Ruthven 09:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI. --P e z i 15:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI. --Hubertl 20:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Poor quality IMO. Per Ruthven. --Lmbuga 22:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:African_Lion_Panthera_leo_Snow_Pittsburgh_2816px.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination African Lion. Yes it has CAs. Lots of them. It's from an old camera, and the picture still looks nice. --Ram-Man 04:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose An old camera does not justify exceptions from image guidelines. Removing CA is an easy to apply postprocessing work. While the CA are fixable, my decline goes for the blurry snowflakes. --Cccefalon 08:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    Easy? Only if you have the software to fix it, which I don't. Anyway, it's a picture with falling snow, of course the flakes are blurry. Ram-Man 13:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Blurry snowflakes can't be a reason for declining. That's what makes the picture interesting. CA may be fixable. Regards, Yann 12:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose -- This is a very nice composition despite the tight crop above. Unfortunatley one of the lions is out of focus. The blurred snowflakes don't bother me. Alvesgaspar 11:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Alvesgaspar--Lmbuga 22:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I like this picture -- Holleday 11:34, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Kasteel_Schoonselhof_Antwerpen.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Kasteel Schoonselhof Antwerpen --Brackenheim 15:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Needs perspective correction Poco a poco 15:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)~
  • I disagree: Since the camera position obviously was far below the vertical center of the building, it's perfectly normal that the verticals seem to lean in a bit at the top. Making things perfectly straight works to some degree for buildings with a more or less flat front, but here we have some very 3D features – for example, we are looking at the underside of the roof (especially visible in the triangle). Making the verticals vertical will only make it look less natural, because the observer's brain will get mixed signals: 1) Straight verticals implying that the eye level is somewhere around the vertical center of the building and 2) 3D features such as the roof, the windowsill or the arcs above the windows implying that eye level actually is somewhere around the top step. --El Grafo 13:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Ram-Man 13:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't see what the fuss is. Beautiful picture. Jakec 00:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Sometimes i wish the analog time back, where perspective correction was not possible (just wisth tilt shift lens). In this case I need geometric measurements in the file to find any distorsions. So i dont see any reason to dismiss it. Good quality. -- DerFussi 05:03, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Trostburg_Waidbruck_North_face.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The castle Trostburg in Waidbruck, South Tyrol - North face --Moroder 11:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion One dust spot on the right side --Uoaei1 14:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done Fixed, thanks --Moroder 15:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support Ok --Uoaei1 16:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose White halo in the sky. I wish other votes, please.--Jebulon 21:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment This is how Jebulon spoils and spoiled some of my best nominations. I already made the point about it innumerable times. I use some of the best photographic equipment( lenses and camera). I am very accurate with the exposure and make very little adjustments on the RAW files. I almost never do any sharpening. Well, the small 2-3 pixel margins are artifacts of digital photography and are absolutely IRRELEVANT compared to the size of the image. The larger halos are not artifacts and you observe them easily around backlit objects even with the naked eye. I don't know how to explain that physical phenomenon but still I don't think it's disturbing. So what? --Moroder 23:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    •   Comment "So what" ? I think it is disturbing.--Jebulon 21:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I can see that "white halo" in the thumbnail, but at larger sizes it starts to disappear and is almost gone at full size. Not really an issue imho, just like those hints of chromatic aberration you can see along the the top of the tower. --El Grafo (talk) 08:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Checking the threshold, there is a gradient of tones from the top right to the horizon, so it does not appear to have been caused by an incorrect unsharp mask. I don't see any indication that this was anything other than a natural phenomenon, unless someone can show otherwise? Ram-Man 13:45, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support maybe its something personal between Jebulon and Moroder. That should´nt be. Unfortunately, it continues. --Hubertl 22:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Jebolon, the halos: bad image processing. --Alchemist-hp 15:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
    •   Comment How can you say that, since there was no processing at all? I wish I could send you the RAW file --Moroder 18:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
      •   Comment No camera processing neither ? As the photographer was almost in front of the sun, the facade we see was probably too much in shadow. Brightening it (even automatically) creates the halo.--Jebulon 13:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
        •   Comment The camera is set at neutral --Moroder 22:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good. --Code 21:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Norden,_Norddeich,_Mole_--_2014_--_3435.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Anleger in Norddeich, Norden, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 07:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose visible corrections in the sky, I wish other opinions, please.--Jebulon 21:18, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose re Jebulon. It looks very strange, I'd appreciate if the photographer would explain what happened here. Ram-Man 13:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Its difficult to change the background, in this case, the edges are too hard, he did´nt soften it. Probably just one layer, no mask. --Hubertl 22:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment I tried to fix this problem but it's difficult. There are too many different coloration of blue. (FYI: There was a small but disturbing part of a lamp that doesn't belong to the motif.)--XRay 16:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Köln,_Groß-St.-Martin-Kirche_--_2014_--_1807.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Groß-St.-Martin-Kirche, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Nothing is vertical, IMO. I need a consensual review, please.--Jebulon 21:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • It is better now, but I find the correction too strong for the tower at right, which looks strange and unreal.--Jebulon 13:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective should be corrected. --Berthold Werner 08:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I am not a fan of discussion about 0.2 degrees but in this case it's visible at the first glance. Really need some correction. Maybe not enough space at the top then, but you can have it filled up. -- DerFussi 05:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Fixed Thanks for your reviews. It's fixed now.--XRay 16:37, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Much better now. --C messier 08:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Steindy 00:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_December_05_2014&oldid=524645688"