Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 11 2016

Consensual review edit

File:African music singer in São Paulo downtown, Brazil.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Afrincan music singer --The Photographer 11:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Lots of retouching artifacts at the background (left) --Smial 12:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Done noise reduction in background --The Photographer 18:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
    • There are little white specks on her arms and shirt. Can you do anything about those? I see a few of them on the woman in the pink and white dress, too. -- Ikan Kekek 04:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Done --The Photographer 11:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment The title should be "African", not "Afrincan", surely?--Peulle 11:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks done --The Photographer 12:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • The Photographer, I still see little white spots in the hair of the woman in the pink and white dress. When you correct those, I plan to support this picture. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
    •   Oppose - Not done, and I'm now noticing some kind of terrible smudge on the left side that I don't remember seeing before. Too bad; this is a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 10:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
    • The problem is overprocessing. We see some retouching in the background, and we see very strong noise reduction, then combined with strong sharpening. This makes artifacts everywhere. I would suggest to start from scratch with the raw file and use less invasive retouching methods. In street photography with moving people it can be necessary to use rather high ISO settings to get a sharp image and then some amount of noise is acceptable. Btw: I really like the composition and the situation. Great snapshot! --Smial 23:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support This is for me a "lived" picture and the quality is in my opinion good enough fo QI. --Rabax63 10:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too noisy and the background is too busy. But I like the subject. Alvesgaspar 23:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Weak support, IMO the noise is acceptable. --Palauenc05 22:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose On the whole I feel there is too much noise, especially considering this is an outdoor shot. --Peulle 11:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 19:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)