Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 16 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Ice_spikes.jpg edit

 

Thank you for review --Neptuul 21:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained_glass_windows_of_the_Our_Lady_Cathedral_of_Rodez_20.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stained-glass windows of Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - The top frame is very unsharp, so unless that can be fixed, this is not a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done, it's better? --Tournasol7 13:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Still disturbing to me. It looks like camera shake produced a double image in that frame. -- Ikan Kekek 14:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Ikan. A pity. --Smial 11:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Steindy 00:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Igreja_Matriz_de_Santana_de_Parnaíba_por_Rodrigo_Tetsuo_Argenton_(01).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination --Rodrigo.Argenton 11:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Without correcting the perspective, this is not a quality image though sharpness and colors are good. Further we need a description here. -- Spurzem 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Perspective correction are for images that have issues of perspective, this is a deliberate choice. --Rodrigo.Argenton 16:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Rodrigo.Argenton: Will you say that the building really is so tilted and that it probably will collapse soon? -- Spurzem 21:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose You can't have an image from this angle and distance with the perspective looking like this.--Peulle 11:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Even if converging verticals sometimes make sense as a means of design or composition, for example to emphasise the upwardly striving lines of Gothic architecture, but also in some modern architecture, this is unfortunately not the case here. This church is simply depicted crookedly, sorry. --Smial 10:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per the others. This perspective really doesn't work for me (even if intentional). --Domob 19:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Steindy 00:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)