Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 03 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Waste_picker_of_Recife,_Pernambuco,_Brazil.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Waste picker of Recife --Wilfredor 19:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry, but that's just too noisy. --MB-one 20:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
      Done MB-one I uploaded another denoised version, thanks --Wilfredor 20:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Still too noisy, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 07:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Seven Pandas 02:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Seven Pandas 02:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:2016_Luxgen_S3_(front).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A red Taiwan-made car
  • Promotion -User3204 11:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. DoF too small, JPEG artifacts, ISO should be lower for this kind of images. --XRay 11:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
      Support I disagree. DoF is good enough for the main subject and the artefacts are only on the background, which seems tolerable to me giving the main subjects excellent sharpness. --MB-one 14:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
      Support per MB-one. Solid QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)