Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 04 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Labros,_Guadalajara,_España,_2017-01-07,_DD_08.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Labros, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 19:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality: There's something wrong with this one. It looks unsharp and overprocessed. --Peulle 21:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
    •   New version with some improvements although IMHO the original version was surely not worth a decline. Poco a poco 12:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. OK for QI. Maybe a bit sky is dispensable . --Milseburg 13:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment hmmm... Look at the roof of the church/chapel in the left or the roof of the houses on the top of the hill. I agree peulle here. -- DerFussi 06:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support OK for QI, imo. --A.Savin 15:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support looks OK. Charlesjsharp 16:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2014_Tbilisi,_Cerkiew_Metechi_(04).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Metekhi church. Tbilisi, Georgia. --Halavar 20:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support The church is clear enough. -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For me the church is not sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Am I becoming too much of a softy? I was figuring that allowing for the size of the photo, the church was sufficiently sharp. Its sharpness is certainly not optimal. I think I'll change to   Neutral. -- Ikan Kekek 12:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Question The sharpness for me isn't excellent but within the limits, however could you please confirm if the church is tilted this way? It seems that on all its pictures it is... --Basotxerri 17:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment If on all images church looks tilted, means that it is. The vertical lines of the church are not perfectly straight. --Halavar 11:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  • OK, thank you.   Support, OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Snowboarder_carving_at_Wachusett.gk.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A snowboarder descending a slope at Mount Wachusett in Massachusetts. --Grendelkhan 22:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Weak   Support. It would be better if the snowboarder was a bit sharper but IMO still within the limits. --Basotxerri 19:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 19:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose lacks sharpness. --Satdeep Gill 17:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 13:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)