Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 18 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Bruecke besalu.jpg edit

 

File:2014_Suchum,_Nabrzeże_przed_burzą_(07).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Embankment before the storm. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Weak   Support DoF could be better. --XRay 08:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • DOF would be ok if the image were landscape, cropped to below the jetty and around the cloud change. But it's not, so most of the image is out of focus. Further the guy on the jetty shows motion blur.   Oppose --Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Image is not sharp. --Shansov.net 02:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined Code 06:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Hitchin railway station MMB 05 180109.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 180109 at Hitchin. Mattbuck 08:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For me the front of the train is very overexposed. Or don't I see right? -- Spurzem 10:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, not a QI for me. --Dnalor 01 16:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. Exposure is good. The reflection was really there (I assume), so it's no defect if the picture shows it properly. --Code 09:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Spurzem --Palauenc05 17:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Spurzem --Livioandronico2013 21:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Overexposure is a problem if it means detail is lost. There is no detail lost here - we are looking at the reflection of the sun (which in almost all cases will be pure white) on a featureless panel. Mattbuck 23:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
And I completely desagree   --Livioandronico2013 20:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
So you are of the opinion that any white in an image means it should be declined, even if it is not causing any information loss? Mattbuck 20:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
no....Then?--Livioandronico2013 22:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Image needs more contrast (dark areas are not dark enough). Overexposed train front is not a problem. --Shansov.net 03:03, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined Code 06:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)