Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 19 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Tourists taking pictures from Pyramid of the Moon, Teotihuacan.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tourists taking pictured from Pyramid of the Moon, Teotihuacan --Daniel Case 19:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Commons:Country specific consent requirements say that you must have permission to publish this image because it was taken in Mexico. Apologies if I am wrong. Charlesjsharp 23:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Oh God, not this argument all over again ... All I can say is that, according to this reading of the relevant Mexican law, "Under the law, ‘private life’ refers to all activities that are not destined to be public ..." I kind of think going out to a popular tourist destination and taking pictures is really destined to be no less public than eating ice cream with your children at another highly-visited UNESCO World Heritage Site. Daniel Case 05:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good quality. Let's approve the photo on its merits, since there is a disagreement about whether the photo is admissible. If you think the photo is no good, nominate it for deletion. Note that Daniel's vote doesn't count. For some reason, nominators' votes count only at FPC, not here or in VIC. -- Ikan Kekek 11:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality photo. I'm happy with the personality warning etc. accompanying the file.--Peulle 19:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support as Peulle -- DerFussi 07:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst 16:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 18:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Himalayas_Langtang.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mountains in Nepal. National park Langtang. -- Sergey Pesterev 12:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Overprocesssed. Too much noise. Sorry, not a QI for me --Halavar 13:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Not so bad. Fog and haze appears like noise. --Ermell 20:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Voting to oppose until such time that the noise has been fixed; it should not be too difficult, surely.--Peulle 14:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 18:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Jardín_de_Dolat-Abad,_Yazd,_Irán,_2016-09-21,_DD_36.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Dolat-Abad Garden, Yazd, Iran --Poco a poco 08:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 10:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Perspective needs to be fixed when I look at the walls of the main building. Ermell 20:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Question - What do you think, Poco a poco? Did you keep the slanty walls intentionally for effect, or should they be adjusted, as Ermell says? -- Ikan Kekek 11:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Ermell.--Peulle 14:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment   Fixed, sorry for the late answer, it should be ok now, thanks, Poco a poco 20:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Agreed.--Peulle 23:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 01:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)