Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 25 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Minibus_tranportant_vodoun_Zangbéto_et_adeptes_pour_la_fête_du_vodoun_au_Bénin.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Minibus transporting vodoun Zangbéto and followers for the feast of vodoun in Benin --Adoscam 17:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose Nice African photo, but not sharp enough. ISO is also very high and the exposure time very long. --Michielverbeek 19:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
    Weak   Support No FP but QI for me and a very impressive shot. Pleas discuss -- Spurzem 20:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Chroma noise, poor lighting, lack of sharpness, disturbing objects both sides ... not a QI in my eyes.--Peulle 21:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  Comment Disturbing objects on the roadside? The picture shows an everyday street scene in Africa and not a luxury limousine in a car salon like Geneva with countless light reflections and visitors in elegant suits in the background. -- Spurzem 09:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Even if the sides were cropped, or we ignore this point, the image is still nowhere near a QI.--Peulle 19:14, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
I remember QIs like this: Poor lighting, cut main object at the right. But I now, it is not allowed to compare. Therefore please excuse me. -- Spurzem 22:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
At least mine was sharp.--Peulle 08:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

File:South_China_Sea_-_Sulu_Sea_Simpang_Mengayau.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Two seas sign. --Tofeiku 16:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose The sea is uneven --Beninho 10:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
    •   Comment Fixable. Changed to "Nomination" --PantheraLeo1359531 12:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
      •   Comment No, that's not how we do it. When an oppose vote is cast, the image is declined or sent to Consensual Review. Sending it there now. --Peulle 23:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Autumn_leaves_-_2019-11-04_-_Andy_Mabbett.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Autumn leaves, collected on a "park keeper's spike". --Pigsonthewing 19:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   SupportGood quality. --Seven Pandas 22:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose - Great idea, and I like the leaves, but there are what look like artifacts to me that bother me, particularly in the background. I'm talking about dots that presumably really aren't part of the grass. So I think this is worth a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 04:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too many artifacts.--Ermell 14:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The artefacts are all over the place, but especially visible on the greens in the background. Also easy to see along the edges of the petioles on the leaves to the left. I also think the left crop is a bit tight, cutting parts of the leaf.--Peulle 20:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)