Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 07 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Dioscuri_of_Palazzo_della_Civiltà_Italiana.jpg edit

 

File:141102_Platzhaus_Teutoburger_Platz.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Platzhaus, Teutoburger Platz, Berlin. --Code 20:02, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • The left is leaning in and CAs in the tree at right --Christian Ferrer 21:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
    •   Comment Thank you for the review. --Code 13:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support CAs removed (that was really just a brise, left side corrected. --Hubertl 18:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment @Hubertl: Thanks a lot! This wasn't fixable with Lightroom. --Code 18:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment there is always CAs at top left and rop right, and yes it's fixable with lightroom : there is a checkbox for CAc and if that is not enough there is the eyedropper tool "delete the fringe" --Christian Ferrer 08:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
    •   Done It´s really a remarkable lens ;-) Ok, I removed it! Please don´t tell/hit me, Christian, that it´s a little unsharp in those two corners too. I´ve seen it! It´s this f***** kit-lens. --Hubertl 10:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
      •   Comment I know and I'm so sorry. I am definitely going to buy something new this year. --Code 10:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Ram-Man 12:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry guys, but the composition and the lighting are not convincing. Disturbing details are the foreground (at left), the shadows over the building and the background. Alvesgaspar 18:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment the composition is like it is. Its a small house, surrounded by trees in a urban park, this park is surrounded by houses - elsewise, it won´t be a urban park. Its pretty difficult to remove the city to have a better background. The "disturbing" detail on the foreground is now removed. The shadows over the building are, because the sun was shining and the trees don´t have so many leaves left, because - surprise - it was the 11th of November. Avoiding this shadows means, to wait until its dark, but then, you will miss the most interesting thing, the graffities. In the night, all cats are grey. That´s Berlin. And Berlin is in Germany - somewhere. Maybe all this together may help you to sharpen your sins for reality! --Hubertl 16:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --DKrieger 18:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me, nice composition. --Dnalor 01 08:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Steindy 18:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 09:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Door_of_cemetery_in_Trevignano_Romano.jpg edit

 

File:Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (16).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Udo Jürgens in concert with his typical bathrobe at “Der Soloabend 2010” in St Margarethen im Burgenland (Austria). --Steindy 19:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose Insufficient quality. IMO it's too unsharp. And there is motion blur. And noisy. May be the focus was on the hand on the left. --XRay 07:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
      Support give him some other opinions. It´s worth, I think --Hubertl 14:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overall, too many shortcomings. --Smial 16:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 09:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Campanario_1_Curahuara_de_Carangas.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Templo de Curahuara de Carangas --Ezarate 22:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Comment IMO too much saturation.--XRay 08:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)   Done Ezarate 01:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
      Comment It's very blue, like during the blue hour. I just another opinion.--XRay 09:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
    I agree XRay It really like blue sky, but thi slooks too blue. Looks a bit unnatural. And the sky is imho a bit too noisy. -- DerFussi 08:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I think the sky is too dark/too saturated, but I really like how the deep contrast works with the subject. For a QI, I can live with the sky defect since the main subject is so well shown. With some extensive processing (to eliminate the sky noise), this would make a really good black and white photo too. Ram-Man 03:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A surreal photo. I can't believe that in Bolivia the sky ist so black. --Steindy 13:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment There has been an insufficient time to determine consensus, so I changed back to discuss. Ram-Man 19:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose -- Too violent contrast and too noisy sky. The histogram shows clipping both at the right (white) and left (black), which suggests that the contrast was enhanced after the shot was made. Alvesgaspar 18:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 09:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Scenery of Pine Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Pine Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 02:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review   Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Looks oversharpened to me. At this effective resolution, it should have been around f/11 or f/16. Let's discuss. --Ram-Man 03:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The sky is overexposed, what is missing the second line visible. The fact that two lines are present, is seen on the right. --Steindy 18:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

  Comment IMO sky is OK, the second line goes to the post at the background, that's why it's not visible above the other. --C messier 18:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

  Comment Maybe C messier is right. I do not know? Between the trees and the mast is nothing to see from the line... --Steindy 00:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment CR begin two days ago, not eight. Jakec 17:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support The composition is somehow unbalanced but I suppose that is a question of taste. Alvesgaspar 18:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

  Oppose Per Ram --Livioandronico2013 08:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Livioandronico2013 22:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Gagra,_Plaża_(05).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The beach. Gagra, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose I think it is too soft in focus on th left-hand side. Let's discuss. -- Slaunger 17:44, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Weak Support This image looks bad at 100%, but it's still a decent shot that just barely meets my threshold. Ram-Man 03:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support --Steindy 18:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As Slaunger plus lack of detail Alvesgaspar 18:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 10:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)