Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 07 2018

• 
  • Nomination View from the Werzerstrand of the Wörther See with the Karawanks and Velden in the background, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomas Koschat monument on the Werzer Esplanade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Johannes Brahms` bust in the yard of Castle Leonstain on Leonstainerstrasse #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motorship “Klagenfurt” heading for the landing stage at Werzer Esplanade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the frozen Kopper Bay from the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nelumbo nucifer --Vengolis 02:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Strophanthus gratus --Vengolis 02:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Strophanthus gratus --Vengolis 02:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bauhinia sp --Vengolis 02:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clitoria arborea --Vengolis 02:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose Bush in January 2018 North American blizzard --PumpkinSky 01:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Euonymus in January 2018 North American blizzard --PumpkinSky 01:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Burgplatz in Brunswick, Germany by night. --PtrQs 01:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window of the Castle of Cougousse, commune of Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the Saint James Chapel of Monestiés, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination mailboxes in Laval, Quebec, Canada --Ralf Roletschek 00:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volvo 444 in Laval, Quebec, Canada --Ralf Roletschek 00:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Betonkonstruktion an der Metrostation Pie-IX in Montreal, Canada --Ralf Roletschek 00:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 00:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Paczków 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Paczków 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Paczków 5 --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the interior gallery of Serrabone Priory: marble relief with evangelists' symbols. --Palauenc05 22:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, merci beaucoup! Tournasol7 22:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bass relief in monument to ancient Jose de San Martin in Grand Bourg garden toghether his daughter and his granddaughters --Ezarate 19:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Enough for good quality. Tournasol7 23:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-eared bulbul (Pycnonotus leucotis leucotis), Bharatpur, India --Charlesjsharp 19:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Enough for QI, thanks for nice image. Tournasol7 22:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Casillas, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion A hamlet? quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remains of a romanic temple, Alcolea de las Peñas, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pillory, Rueda de la Sierra, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chera, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice view and good quality. Tournasol7 18:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Riba de Santiuste, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anania Shirakatsi statue in Gyumri --Armenak Margarian 14:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment There are too much pink and magenta colours. Please change temperature of White Balance or decrese pink and magenta colours. --Halavar 17:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)  Done White balance changed, CA fixed --Armenak Margarian 18:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
     Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 19:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hemerocallis 'Summer Wine' --Paulparadis 13:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Yes, now it's described better, merci. Good quality, Tournasol7 16:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination North portal of Serrabone Abbey, Boule d'Amont, France.--Palauenc05 12:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset over the Praek Tuek Chhu river. Kampot, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion beautiful and good quality --Armenak Margarian 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chanchhaya Pavilion. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Halavar can you remouve spot in the sky, left part? If you don't find i can make a note? --Armenak Margarian 12:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 12:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
     CommentFix done, good quality. --Prosthetic Head 13:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok. --Sputniktilt 09:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Place de la Porte Neuve in Saint-Côme-d'Olt, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porte du Barry in Conques, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canoeing on Tarn River in La Malene, Lozere, France. --Tournasol7 08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 Coupe 2,7 --Ermell 07:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 Coupe --Ermell 07:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 Carrera RSR --Ermell 07:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 2,4l --Ermell 07:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:51, 4 January Promotion(UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cockpit of a Porsche 356 1600 --Ermell 07:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Car parks ski ressort in Annaberg, Lower Austria --GT1976 07:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, to little pixels, It was mistakenly the resolution false adjusted. --GT1976 07:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000 area of Friesland province. Beautifully situated heath lake.
    --Famberhorst 07:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality! --GT1976 07:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Birch mushroom (Piptoporus betulinus) on broken birch branch in natural habitat.
    --Famberhorst 07:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality! --GT1976 07:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Supersnow snow cannon in Annaberg, Lower Austria --GT1976 06:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support. Good quality, but too few pixels.--Famberhorst 06:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chinese goose (Anser cygnoides), in park Panoaya Mexico --Cvmontuy 06:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good focus to the bird --Michielverbeek 06:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Steinbach am Attersee-Upper Austria, church: die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Andreas --Michielverbeek 06:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Mooi voor zwart/wit.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Steinbach and Weissenbach-Upper Austria, the Attersee --Michielverbeek 06:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mondsee-Upper Austria, basilica: Katholische Basilika Sankt Michael --Michielverbeek 06:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain trip from Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier and Praden towards Tschiertschen. Mittelberg (1500 meter).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. Rapids in the Urdenbach.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
• 
  • Nomination Gullfoss, Island --Ralf Roletschek 00:11, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Paczków 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bas-relief. Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 13:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)  Comment I love the details and side light, don´t wanna write something bcs. you have some spots, looking like digital white fault pix from screen (don´t must be real), but can you tell me? Light was really such bright?? --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Madonna and Child (13^th-14^th century) in "Chapelle de la Trinité de Prunet-et-Belpuig", France. --Palauenc05 12:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis bengalensis), UP, India --Charlesjsharp 12:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality PumpkinSky 13:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rufous-tailed jacamar (Galbula ruficauda rufoviridis) male, the Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 12:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality PumpkinSky 13:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weyregg am Attersee-Upper Austria, church: die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Valentin --Michielverbeek 07:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment I think the tower is tilted.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
    Thanks, I have  Done improved the perspective a bit --Michielverbeek 19:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main temple of Angkor Wat. Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 17:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Feraclos Castle in Charaki. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 19:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.-- PumpkinSky 13:29, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Summit lake, Clearwater Wilderness, WA --Trougnouf 18:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Digitalis purpurea in Clearwater Wilderness, WA --Trougnouf 18:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Digitalis purpurea in Clearwater Wilderness, WA --Trougnouf 18:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Soghomon Tehleryan ( Armenian revolutionary) statue in Maralik, Shirak province, Armenia --Armenak Margarian 10:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Artyom Petrosyan ( World War II hero) in Gyumri, Armenia --Armenak Margarian 10:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Walking path at Silbersee III, Haltern am See, Germany --XRay 09:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 07:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main temple of Angkor Wat. Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 19:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 06:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schärding-Upper Austria, view to the town from Neuhaus am Inn with church (der Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Georg) --Michielverbeek 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
    IMHO to much noise and the churchtower is tilted --Berthold Werner 10:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
    Thanks, I have  Done a new perspective correction and I have reduced the noise level. --Michielverbeek 22:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Hard to decide but I think it's ok --Berthold Werner 07:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Blaue Lagune, Island --Ralf Roletschek 04:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review Really a beauty. Why I don´t get a high resolution, as uploaded? Again a bot running from the little chinese men in the middle? Don´t get system info like:"Please do not edit the piage. I'm trying to run a bot on it and the servers are performing extremely badly. Yhour edits may be lost!" --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 15:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Icxh verstehe dich nicht, sorry. --Ralf Roletschek 17:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Hier läuft oft, fast täglich ein internes Programm, BOT. Ich kann das Bild nicht in voller Auflösung ansehen.
• 
  • Nomination Music for Life 2017 at Wachtebeke --DirkVE 07:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Horizontality seems inccorect and the image leaning to the left -- Basile Morin 07:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)  Not done PumpkinSky 13:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A spider in a net --KPFC 21:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Without judging the image quality I can tell you that in order to become a QI, an image needs to be properly categorized. In this case, it means getting the species of spider right.--Peulle 14:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)  Not done PumpkinSky 13:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Great_Blue_Heron_VB_1.jpg

• Nomination Great Blue Heron VB 1 --PumpkinSky 01:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but these are not near QI. Charlesjsharp 22:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I agree, not a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Main subject too unsharp, sorry. --Basotxerri 09:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 13:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 15:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC))

File:Great_Blue_Heron_VB_2.jpg

• Nomination Great Blue Heron VB 2 --PumpkinSky 01:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 02:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but these are not near QI. Charlesjsharp 22:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek 06:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 13:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 15:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Great_Blue_Heron_VB_3.jpg

• Nomination Great Blue Heron VB 3 --PumpkinSky 01:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 02:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but these are not near QI. Charlesjsharp 22:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. Even on the file page, you can see the unsharpness. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 13:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 15:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Lodares_de_Osma,_Soria,_España,_2017-05-26,_DD_52.jpg

• Nomination Lodares de Osma, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 12:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Here something seems to have gone wrong. It's sharp somewhere in the greens in front of the houses --Granada 13:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I do not agree wit you. I think the sharpness is pretty good enough. QI for me --Halavar 14:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is acceptable for me --Armenak Margarian 18:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 20:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-01-01 (212) McKinley Hiking boots.jpg

• Nomination McKinley Hiking boots. --GT1976 18:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Decline
• A overflASHed pic for ebay, or what the sense here??
• For that kind of picture, it has to be very good, i.e. corect exposure, no blur, and so on. This one is not sufficient for QI, sorry. --Sputniktilt 21:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree and am going to bat for this photo. I think it is QI worthy. PumpkinSky 23:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Flash and resolution are not the best, but acceptable. --XRay 05:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Easy-to-take image with rather low resolution, weak sharpness probably due to noise reduction, bad lighting by direct flash. If this image gets QI status I would love to change my votes at George's mushroom photos some days ago, which are much better and only declined because of similar (bad) lighting. --Smial 08:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose While there's nothing badly wrong with the image, for stationary objects under controlled conditions I'd expect more than of harder subjects (which are sometiems rejected for similar technical quality). In particular, the lighting and focus could be improved a little and perhapse a different (non-textured) background.--Prosthetic Head 10:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Info @Prosthetic Head: It looks like you've made the comment above but unless you sign it, your vote will not be counted. --W.carter 10:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)  Done

•  Oppose IMO too harsh lighting. --Basotxerri 18:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 20:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Crest dil Cut and Crest Ault as seen from Präzer Höhi zw.jpg

• Nomination Mountain tour from Sarner Alp (1853 meters) via Präzer Höhi (2119 meters) to Tguma (2163 meters). Descend to Berggasthaus Parsiras. View from the mountain ridge. There is a lot of rain rise.
  --Famberhorst 07:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 12:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but looks like that most here have never seen a real black and white print. Totally underexposed in negative, to protect faults by exposere, only to convert it to b&w, makes it NOT better... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 16:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I've seen loads of black & white prints, and this looks good enough for QI to me. And stop making these kinds of rude pronouncements. -- Ikan Kekek 20:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Acceptable for QI, but black and white could be improved. --XRay 05:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per XRay --Billy (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 11:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Weyregg am Attersee, vanaf Attersee am Attersee 1e poging foto3 2017-08-11 16.57.jpg

• Nomination Weyregg am Attersee-Upper Austria, from Attersee am Attersee --Michielverbeek 07:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Underexposed --Dmottl 09:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Certainly not underexposed, but suffering from noise reduction --Shansov.net 15:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Not underexposed, sharp enough and typical for these weather conditions. --XRay 05:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support as XRay. --Ralf Roletschek 11:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 11:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Weyregg am Attersee, vanaf Attersee am Attersee 2e poging foto6 2017-08-11 17.00.jpg

• Nomination Weyregg am Attersee-Upper Austria, from Attersee am Attersee --Michielverbeek 07:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Underexposed --Dmottl 09:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

• The brightest photo of all five because exposure time and ISO, please leave a message if you have better ideas for making photos under those kind of weather-circumstances. --Michielverbeek 10:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Not underexposed, sharp enough and typical for these weather conditions. --XRay 05:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support as XRay. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 11:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Attersee am Attersee, de jachthaven foto6 2017-08-11 17.13.jpg

• Nomination Attersee am Attersee-Upper Austria, the marina --Michielverbeek 07:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Underexposed --Dmottl 09:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

• Very dark clouds appearing in the sky so the photo is also mainly very dark. However some small parts are sunny and blue and I think more exposure would have overexposed those parts. --Michielverbeek 10:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Not underexposed, sharp enough and typical for these weather conditions. Looks like dramatic weather. --XRay 05:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support as XRay. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 11:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Attersee am Attersee, zicht op der Attersee foto3 2017-08-11 17.16.jpg

• Nomination Attersee am Attersee-Upper Austria, view to the Attersee --Michielverbeek 07:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support A bit of noise, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 07:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Underexposed --Dmottl 09:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Not underexposed, sharp enough and typical for these dark weather conditions. --XRay 06:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support as XRay. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 11:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:2014_Paczków,_Kosciól_Matki_Bożej_Nieustającej_Pomocy_01.JPG

• Nomination Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Help in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not know if the frame is really appropriate for the subject, but there is too much CA on the top. --Milseburg 09:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Issue for me is the crop - I'd like to see the end of the church building at the right rather than have it cut off suddenly. As above, there is a lot of blue fringing to the leaves, something I often suffer from with my optics on bright backgrounds --Prosthetic Head 17:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 11:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Sculpture Symposium.jpg

• Nomination "Gyumri" International Sculpture Symposium in Gyumri --Armenak Margarian 20:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Too dark. --HalfGig 21:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  
•  Support its no too dark i think. --Ralf Roletschek 00:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
   Support - I agree. I don't think its being backlit is fatal for a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 03:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment- @HalfGig: I don´t get it. The digital negative here is overexposed, matter from wrong exposure metering (Auto not spot). I remember red sandstones in Armenia with strong and heavy red tones, here it´s not really bad bcs. main objekt is complete in shadow at PM (post meridiem) with a hard caucasian side light from rear (backside). I don´t like it, bcs snap-quality (auto exposure), but promote the other ones. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad lighting. Perhaps it is a valued image but no quality image for me. -- Spurzem 21:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

 Done i upload other version, please can you review?--Armenak Margarian 21:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too dark for this time of the day under these light conditions. --Michielverbeek 12:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment-You have uploaded a new one (with more snow and undersaturated winter light´s) that is more worse. Looks like the tips here will give you a totally wrong way, when you make it only more bright. IMO you lighten up a overexposed negative. From the beginning: Armenia Sandstones in red have a great saturation (middletones) it will get hard to find the right graduation with high contrast und undersaturated light (in cold tones bcs. objekt is in shadow (Canal blue and red are not friends). IMO (recipe to handle the lights here) try to use a external flash from side (like a strip light) then you will get more red as red and details and contrast in the main object. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:50, 03 January 2017 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 11:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Gobeo - Bolera - BT 01.jpg

• Nomination Bowling alley of Gobeo. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 21:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose High Noon Shot! I hope this example will not get any reference character for QI-Level. IMO it shows another overexposed one. A good composition, but White is here not an unimportant cloud, it´s a wall without details (important part of composition). Missing then middletones, correct graduation, colour details and hard shadows for Zenith Sun. Messure the grey ground with spotmeter will tell more about correct exposure. A really difficult light, but an picture must be printable (with reduced tones, too). I can only imagine it works in black&white much better. (with a lot of dodge&burn) but pls. not as a colour reference --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
• Mild  Support - You make some good points, but I think it's good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
•  mild oppose Considering this should be easy to fix in post, I think it should be done before it's promoted.--Peulle 14:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Peulle:  Done Better now? --Basotxerri 10:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me -- Spurzem 21:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin 11:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle 18:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support-- PumpkinSky 18:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst 10:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Good enough right now. "Mich wundert nur eines, muss ich mir in ein paar Tagen nochmals ansehen. Wenn man den Fluchtpunkt schon so erzwingt, ohne das sich der Betrachter geistige Linien ziehen muss, dürfte er jetzt größer sein. Kann sein das ich hier der eigenen optischen Täuschung zum Opfer falle." --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Famberhorst (talk) 10:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC) (UTC)