Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 10 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Ferata_de_Gherdeina_Lock_FS_R.410.004_a_Urtijëi.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Old steam locomotive in Urtijëi. --Moroder 04:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 04:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC) {Presume 'Support' --Scotch Mist 12:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)}
    Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC) {Presume 'Oppose' --Scotch Mist 12:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)}
  •   Question @Kallerna: Did you look at the histogram? Please do it! --Moroder 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Well histogram isn't everything. The snow should not be dark grey, it should be white. Snowy landscapes need overall higher exposure. --Kallerna 07:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I was born on November, 15 and it was snowing outside. I have never seen a white snow! --Moroder 09:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • No, I have not seen grey snow, even in Austria. Maybe there is something wrong with my eye sight, it might be grey (even black?). Should revise my medical... --Kallerna 00:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Quality is IMO OK, but white should be improved. Please have a look to File:Ferata de Gherdeina Lock FS R.410.004 a Urtijëi dinviern.jpg. --XRay 05:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good to me. I think in the other photo, the locomotive is hit by more sunlight. A minute can make a difference that way, with the movement of clouds. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support As per Ikan - QI --Scotch Mist 07:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good Quality --Fischer.H 09:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Red_hiking_stripe_sign_Lysá_hora_2021_04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Red hiking stripe sign on the way to the top of Lysá hora in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 00:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose 6 images of the same hiking stripe sign? Please nominate only the best one. --Kallerna 07:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
      CommentIs it really how QIs are meant to be reviewed? Never heard this argument before... --T.Bednarz 07:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support As far as I am aware there is no limit on the number of different good quality photos that can be submitted of the same object or scene - QI --Scotch Mist 07:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Red_hiking_stripe_sign_Lysá_hora_2021_05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Red hiking stripe sign on the way to the top of Lysá hora in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 00:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose 6 images of the same hiking stripe sign? Please nominate only the best one. --Kallerna 07:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment I get this when it comes to VIC or FPC, but what bothers you here? --T.Bednarz 10:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
    • Perhaps you could specify which one(s) you would promote rather than complain about number with no additional feedback? Rhododendrites 04:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. These are all from different angles and my feeling is that they're interesting studies of the snow and frost on the sign. Kallerna, not to make an exact analogy, but are you familiar with Monet's series of paintings of the Cathedral of Rouen in different lights? Would you have rather he did only one painting of it and destroyed the others? OK, that's a rather extreme question and a bit of a straw man, I admit, but I feel like your fanaticism on this issue is missing the point that a series of photographs that study a particular challenge in terms of representation of texture or of a subject from different angles and with different backgrounds and so forth is quite a legitimate form of artistic practice in any field. Should I, as a jazz composer, perform only my best blues tune, if I could decide which one that is, and discard all the others? I don't think so. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Do you see all photos here as an art? I believe Commons is more about documentation. I agree that it could be (in some cases) beneficial to upload several imgs of same subject (often actually the opposite), but it is definitely not beneficial to flood QI candidate list with 6 almost duplicates or to promote them all. The subject isn't so significant that we would need all these versions. Everything can be considered as art, but this is not an art gallery. --Kallerna 07:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment (1) No, I don't see all photos here primarily as art; some are indeed more about documentation. (2) However, as this is a gallery of photos and photography is an art, this is indeed an art gallery. I'd add a third point, which is that VIC is more squarely focused on documentation than either QIC or FPC. QIC does focus to a large degree on technical achievement, but composition is also part of the point of a good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 20:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Well put Ikan - photography to many people is more about art than 'documentation' (which is certainly a primary aspect of QI) Kallerna and a change in detail between photos may be insignificant to you but may be highly significant to others - of course each photo has to meet the criteria for QI and IMO this photo meets those criteria --Scotch Mist 08:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support seems fine to me Rhododendrites 04:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Red_hiking_stripe_sign_Lysá_hora_2021_06.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Red hiking stripe sign on the way to the top of Lysá hora in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 00:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose 6 images of the same hiking stripe sign? Please nominate only the best one. --Kallerna 07:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality and another nice study of this texture. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support As per Ikan - QI --Scotch Mist 08:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:View_of_commune_of_Severac-le-Chateau_09.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View of commune of Sévérac-le-Château from the castle of Sévérac, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Overprocessed sky. --Kallerna 22:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I'm not agree. --Tournasol7 08:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice view and well documented --Moroder 01:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I have the same camera, and the sky looks absolutely normal to me. --The Cosmonaut 03:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I consider this a great photo and I would support it for FP as well, though I think it might be nitpicked for things like the pole and rolled-up fence in the near left corner at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 06:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Info just to clarify, the highlights have been tweaked a lot (due to harsh light). In result, the photo is oversaturated, the whole view is unnatural and there is strong halo effects all around the photo. --Kallerna 07:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Perhaps you could label some of the strong halo effects you're seeing. -- Ikan Kekek 20:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Burgruine_NW-Tor_zum_äußeren_Hof_26122020_0267.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Portal to the outer castle yard northwest of the castle ruins Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Shadows/highlights adjusted too much. --Kallerna 21:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  • OK, the noise should be reduced. --XRay 07:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I find it hard to believe the color of the sky near the top of the gate on the right. Also, is it possible to reduce the noise? -- Ikan Kekek 20:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Done @XRay: @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your reviews. I reduced the noise. -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 22:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Moroder 01:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I like the composition but I haven't yet decided whether to support in spite of the remaining issues near the tops of the gates. If not, I would abstain. -- Ikan Kekek 06:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Burgruine_nordöstliche_Schildmauer_26122020_0262.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Northeastern curtain wall of castle ruin Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective? Distorted, harsh light, overprocessed. --Kallerna 21:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Done @Kallerna: Thanks for your review. I revised the image. —- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice --Moroder 01:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support A little unsharp on the upper left but good overall and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Indira_Gandhi_Memorial_Delhi-India4462.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Indira Gandhi Memorial, Delhi, India --Poco a poco 12:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Moroder 05:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted. --Kallerna 21:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment New version Poco a poco 12:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry but this composition seems messy to me. --T.Bednarz 21:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Münchner_Residenz,_München,_Deutschland_Panorama.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Panoramic view of the Emperor's Courtyard, exterior of the Munich Residence, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 14:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 22:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Challenging light has brought several technical problems - can be seen even at thumbnail size. --Kallerna 22:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Could you please be a bit more precise what you mean? --Poco a poco 17:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment The people in the middle look distorted. --T.Bednarz (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
    • Nevermind. --T.Bednarz 23:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 21:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)