Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 15 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (068).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Neunkirchen railwaystation – Ballast-management system „BDS 2000-4“ (part 1). --Steindy 00:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose overexposed at right, the roof of the machine is burned out --Christian Ferrer 06:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    On the possibility of correction you have not thought of and must be the same in counterpoint? However, this was a breeze. Re-uploaded; other votes please. --Steindy 21:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:46, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp, CA, many artifacts from reworking, multi color overhead lines... sorry, not an QI. -- Smial 14:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --C messier 15:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Marburg von Osten Panorama.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Panorama of Marburg. --Hydro 21:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Its not a panorama of Marbug, its more a panorama of the meadow. --Hubertl 11:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  • But it's a nice meadow. --Hydro 22:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment indeed, it is! Try to make a tighter crop from the bottom..--Hubertl 08:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I've tried it, but the current version looks better in my opinion. --Hydro (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I hate to oppose but I think the picture is simply not sharp enough considering that it's not very large. Bei der Auflösung sollte es einfach schärfer sein. Seltsam bei der Blende. Die Idee fürs Motiv finde ich aber ziemlich gut, das solltest Du nochmal machen, vielleicht bei besserem Wetter und geringerer ISO-Zahl. --Code 22:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 15:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)