Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 22 2014

Consensual review edit

File:London MMB «C3 1 Cabot Square.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 20:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    weak   Oppose Perspectives a bit disturbing IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
    Perspective corrected. Mattbuck 22:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Sorry, I thought that it was not fixable, I was wrong --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Ray-Ban_Aviator_sunglasses.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ray-Ban Aviator sunglasses --The Photographer 14:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Please crop a bit on the left. Mattbuck 21:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Statues_of_the_Virgin_Mary.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Statues of the Virgin Mary --The Photographer 14:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Please crop a bit on the left. Mattbuck 21:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Petare_Slums_in_Caracas.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Petare Slums in Caracas --The Photographer 14:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted clockwise. Please darken low levels to increase contrast. Mattbuck 21:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 13.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sculpture at the Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar --Bgag 14:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose unsharp --A.Savin 15:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Is it better now? --Bgag 19:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
    • No, it is too soft, but you may try to reprocess (maybe this is because of compression artefacts, since 874 KB is actually much too few for 10 MP resolution) --A.Savin 19:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
      • My mistake. Hope this version is better. --Bgag 21:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support OK now. --A.Savin 06:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Qi to me and a pretty good image --DKrieger 22:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice DOF --GMLSX 04:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 22:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Tanum Bottna 136 ID 10160401360001 IMG 8823.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Bronze-age graves, Bottna in Sweden. Long numeral is the national heritage ID number. --Bjoertvedt 15:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)  Comment Needs English description, maybe a perspective correction --Moroder 22:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   SupportGood quality. Wikimedia is a multi-language project, so an English description is not a must. --Uoaei1 18:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree Tilted --Moroder 16:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good. @Moroder: New version, see upload comment. -- Smial 22:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Moroder 15:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Dirtsc 17:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Lewis Hulbert 10:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 22:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Sankt._Moritz_Kirche_Sauders_Villanders_07.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Main Altar of the Saint Maurice church in Villanders --Moroder 18:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   OpposeCrop is too tight, but all the rest is excellent. --Uoaei1 22:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Distortion is here an obvious artistic choice. It works for me.--Jebulon 15:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment My point is not the distortion, but the statues at the left and right are cropped. --Uoaei1 18:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   CommentSorry for the misunderstanding. My point was not to comment your opinion, only to express my own.--Jebulon 21:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --P e z i 00:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Franz von Assisi Kirche-Fassadendetail-DSC 0006w.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Kaiser-Jubiläums Church, hl. Franz von Assisi, Vienna, facade detail --P e z i 16:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 17:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, crop is too tight. --Uoaei1 22:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment File name and file description say "facade detail", not "Tower of Franz von Assisi church", so the tight crop is intended. -- Smial 11:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment The image shows the tower in its entire width, so it is not a façade detail to me. It is something between a full view and a detail view. --Uoaei1 18:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

  Support --212.38.39.38 23:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC) invalid vote --Moroder 17:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

  •   Support --Moroder 17:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --JLPC 22:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Aloysius_Mikwauschk_(Martin_Rulsch)_2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Aloysius Mikwauschk, Saxon politician (CDU) and member of the Landtag of the Free State of Saxony (as of 2013). --DerHexer 12:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Oppose extremely bare crop, I'm sorry --A.Savin 14:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC) I disagree and ask for discussion. DerHexer 00:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Asymmetrical on both (left, right) sides and too tight. --Tuxyso 08:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
    It's not too tight. What file are you looking at? People are asymmetrical … DerHexer 11:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
    Oppose striked. It's a useless discussion. I would never crop a portrayal in that way and I guess no one would print a portayal with such a tight crop. Let other users decide. --Tuxyso 11:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Somewhat tight crop, but where is the problem? Nothing cut off. -- Smial 14:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support in my eyes not too tight, its correct. Better than 50% Wall in picture. --Ralf Roletschek 14:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine for me. Lewis Hulbert 20:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Printenmann, Weihnachtsmarkt, Aix-la-Chapelle, Allemagne.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The inflatable "Printenmann", President of the Xmas market, Aachen, Germany.--Jebulon 16:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose  chromatic aberration on Top. --The Photographer 18:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC) I underestand. Fixed now. --The Photographer 17:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
    Not noticed in VIC... And correctible. Thus does not justify a decline immediately. I'll correct.--Jebulon 20:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done Corrected--Jebulon 15:44, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support A polarizer probably could have enhanced colours, but ok for me. -- Smial 15:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --JLPC 22:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Linie29 21:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Rethymno_-_Neratzes-Moschee1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mosquee Neratzes --Taxiarchos228 22:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 00:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Sorry, but I just noticed, that there are many retouching and colorcorrection artifacts visible in the sky (black trianagles, banding, etc.) --Martin Kraft 10:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective correction overdone for the minaret, and strange colors for the sky. Maybe a discussion could help.--Jebulon 20:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
    • it's not possible to make different perpective correction for several image parts of one and the same image. --Taxiarchos228 19:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
    • sky color is balanced now --Taxiarchos228 22:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Bachdenkmal_Thomaskirche_Leipzig_2013.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination New Bach monument at the Thomas Church in Leipzig --Tuxyso 08:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  Comment I would apply a moderate perspective correction to reduce the perspective distortion. Some clockwise rotation might be necessary too. --NorbertNagel 11:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  Done Thanks, Norbert. It is difficult to find the right balance with such motives. Full straight verticals are surely not possible as you know. --Tuxyso 21:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm afraid the distortion is too strong (too visually appealing), and the crop of the pedestal does not work for me. I ask for a discution please. My favourite Cantor deserves better.--Jebulon 13:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
    Have you been there? The statue is very close to the church. No way to photograph Mr Bach with church in background without distortion. I had no drone available, sorry :) --Tuxyso 20:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
    Add: The funny thing, Jebulon, is that you've just nominated a sculpture where you cropped the pedestal in the same way I did here :) --Tuxyso (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  •   Question where, please ?--Jebulon 21:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
    • I had this one in mind. --Tuxyso 22:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
    • I assumed you had this one in mind, but no, I did not crop "in the same way" at all. Anyway, useless discussion.--Jebulon 20:20, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

  Support For me this is good quality. I know the perspective issues there quite well which you have to face when you want to get the Master's statue together with the church, and for me these have been solved --Uoaei1 (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

  •   Comment IMO a further tilt/perspective (I don't demand straight parallel lines) correction could "save" the image. As it is now the musician falls off his pedestal --Moroder 17:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
    •   Comment Agree. JS should be at least vertical like a toccata.--Jebulon 14:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose strong CA at spire, too strong distortion --Taxiarchos228 19:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Jebulon --The Photographer 14:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 21:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Дом_органной_музыки_Днепропетровск_1.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination St. Nicolaus Church in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine. One of WLM region winners. By User:Kurnosenkon --Ahonc 21:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --Stepro 02:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
      Oppose CAs at the left, vertical perspective problems, crop at the top much too wide. --Tuxyso 07:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
  •   Comment Could you add a note because I cant see CA, thanks --The Photographer 17:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment I'll support if perspective and top crop are corrected (CA negligible imo). Nice composition.
  •   Comment New version with slight corrections. -- Smial 23:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Mattbuck 18:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Removing the CA would be nice, but I think it's QI anyway. Lewis Hulbert 10:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jean11 17:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)