Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 27 2023

Consensual review edit

File:3hiki_sot.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Taiyaki. By User:田村 義邦 --RudolfSchreier 06:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Dubious status: the uploader has only three edits, which are three uploads, by three different cameras. Suspecting copyvio. --Gyrostat 13:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose sorry, But this picture seems to be plagiarized. --Q28 09:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --BigDom 07:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Jeune_qui_souffre.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The 115 patrol (see SAMU social) should find him. --Touam 15:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose Jeune? personality rights? invasion of privacy --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment OK for personality rights, I've put it. For "jeune", it is his expression. For invasion of privacy, what ?... are we in his kitchen ? --Touam (talk) 11:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Did he ask to be on Commons? Did this greying man ask to be described as "Young people who suffer"? What injuries are you talking about? Charlesjsharp 13:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • First question : no ; second question : yes ; third question : I don't know, it is his words, and I don't do some verification. --Touam 12:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good portrait for me. Not sure it's an invasion of privacy, he appears to be at least somewhat posing for the photo. BigDom 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems fine to me, and we should assume good faith on Touam's part. -- Ikan Kekek 17:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan --FlocciNivis 20:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 20:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

File:วัดแสงแก้วโพธิญาณ_Wat_Saeng_Kaew_Phothiyan_main_building.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wat Saeng Kaew Phothiyan --Chainwit. 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Needs perspective correction. --C messier 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 05:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective correction not done. --C messier 20:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per C messier --Tagooty 10:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
    @Chainwit., C messier, and Tagooty: I have done a perspective correction. --GrandEscogriffe 19:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --GrandEscogriffe 19:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I don't think you're allowed to vote for your own perspective correction; can someone please clarify? -- Ikan Kekek 23:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • OK, I was assuming it still counted as Chainwit.'s submersion. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 11:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
  • In the past, others who edited someone's photo didn't vote or crossed out their votes. -- Ikan Kekek 19:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support After PC --Tagooty 09:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 20:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)