Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 06 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Ocotal_forest_202006p2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ocotal forest, Mexico City --Cvmontuy 03:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Nice view, but IMO too soft or unsharp. Please have a look to the rope for example. --XRay 03:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Just the rope and the tire were moving, everyting else is sharp --Cvmontuy 11:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
      Comment IMO sharpness could be better. To improve the chances: Please fix the CAs. --XRay 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would say good quality, but I didn't see CAs where are you seeing those? -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • At nearly all tiny branches. --XRay 08:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • The red shift I'm seeing? But I'm seeing that only where there are highlights. I sometimes really don't have a good eye for CAs. -- Ikan Kekek 21:42, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose too much green and purpule CAs near the light throught the trees for me, and little bit over exposed light. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 17:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)