Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 06 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Castello_dell'Abbadia_con_il_ponte_del_diavolo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The devils bridge and the Castello dell'Abbadia in Latium, Italy. (by NikonZ7II) --Grullab 11:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
    It seems that the subject is not obvious enough. Can you take a few more pictures? --Q28 09:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
    The theme doesn't look obvious. Is there a better picture? --Q28 15:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose To my eyes, it looks like I'm seeing the following in different parts of the picture: chromatic aberration, noise, unsharpness, oversharpening, and overexposure in the foreground. But you have a camera that gives you a high resolution, so keep working and I'll look forward to seeing what you can do. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  Comment fun fact: The first version uploaded appears way more natural and would need only minimal rather small corrections. --Smial 08:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
You rate it more highly than I do. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Only the first version without the overprocessing. --Smial 12:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Right, you're rating that version more highly than I. -- Ikan Kekek 22:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Ikan. Very Overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • temp   Oppose per others. Composition and lighting are fine. --Smial 12:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

File:La_madeleine_chateau.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Château de la Madeleine, Rue du Général de Gaulle 250, La Madeleine, France --Velvet 07:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose I find that that shadow in the foreground spoils the compo --Poco a poco 07:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. I can't do much about it, but wouldn't it be a matter of taste ? --Velvet 07:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Composition is sometimes indeed a matter of taste until you have elements that you perceive als disturbing. To me it isn't a QI like this the the shadow + crop spoils it, but we can here other opinions. --Poco a poco 09:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for me. Shadows are not a problem for me. --Sebring12Hrs 06:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The shadow is distracting. If the shadow is cropped out, it may be a QI. --Tagooty 06:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much foreground that distracts from the object  . --F. Riedelio 09:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't like the direct frontal lighting, but that's probably more a matter of personal taste with such architectural photos. Technically, the photo seems to be okay. The shadow can be easily cut off by a potential subsequent user, if it bothers them. --Smial 10:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Good for me --Billy69150 15:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Main subject is fine. Shadow is irrelevant. --Milseburg 20:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial, et al. -- Ikan Kekek 21:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)