Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 15 2021

Consensual review edit

Tourists at Jökulsárlón.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tourists at the glacial lagoon in Iceland. --GuavaTrain 03:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overexposed snow, tilted, COM:OVERCAT. --A.Savin 13:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Normal overall exposure --Moroder 11:10, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose One can argue about the overexposed parts in the background. But at least it's clearly tilted, as A.Savin said. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurred ice + per above. --Nefronus 05:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per A.Savin.--Ermell 07:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 09:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

File:N700a-Mt.Fuji.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination A Shinkansen N700-2000 passing through Mount Fuji. (by MaedaAkihiko) --廣九直通車 09:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry, suffers from motion blur even at 1/4000, and I do know these trains travel fast. I don't complain about the crop to the train.Rodhullandemu 11:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I like the poetry of the bullet train showing motion blur. It would be better if Fujisan were pinpoint sharp by contrast, but I think this is worth a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 23:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Rodhullandemu. --GRDN711 11:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. --Smial 20:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm afraid the motion blur isn't noticeable enough to pass as a stylistic choice. --Zinnmann 10:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Rodhullandemu --Ermell 07:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 09:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)