Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 27 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Hochdorf_Assenheim_Langstraße_25_003_2021_07_17.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sign with house number on the former town hall in Assenheim --F. Riedelio 06:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Not striking; lights are not ideal for such a photograph. --Hillopo2018 07:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 19:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Totally fine. QIC isn't about what's ideal; it's about what's of good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Vote by User:Hillopo2018 not counted (new user, not allowed to vote yet) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Neon_Dyna_Wide_Glide.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Harley-Davidson 2005 FXDWGI Dyna Wide Glide, with custom extra high "ape hanger" handlebars, on a dark street, illuminated by neon light. --Lambda 06:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Out of focus. --Hillopo2018 08:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
      Comment I disagree; the subject is in the peak focus of the image, though there is a slight overall softness. Further discussion at photography critiques, and I've applied a couple of tweaks to address this. --Lambda 05:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
      Comment It turns out there was an issue with my editing that I couldn't see. I've addressed that now and uploaded a new version.--Lambda 20:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please note that I did not count the vote by very new User:Hillopo2018 who is not allowed to vote yet. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Cogon_Grass_Arnehar_Himachal_May19_D72_10265.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Cogon or cotton-wool grass, Arnehar, Himachal --Tagooty 06:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Too noisy --Hillopo2018 08:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
    @Hillopo2018:
  • I've applied noise reduction. Please see the new version. --Tagooty 09:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me now. Rodhullandemu 10:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Quite good. I just think about the composition: what about removing a little space from the top/right?
  •   Comment The composition is fine to me, but could you please identify the species? -- Ikan Kekek 06:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: Added CAT:Imperata cylindrica and Description, thanks. --Tagooty 14:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Red_Rose_Flower_IITMandi_Himachal_Aug19_D72_11473.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Red Rose, Botanical Garden, IIT Mandi --Tagooty 06:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Too noisy --Hillopo2018 08:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
    @Hillopo2018: I've applied noise reduction. Please see the new version. --Tagooty 09:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me now Rodhullandemu 10:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Not the sharpest and the red/pink looks a little burnt, but surely enough for QI. --Nefronus 19:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • @Hillopo2018: I've deleted your vote as you are not yet eligible to review (see discussion here) --Tagooty 15:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Nemška_pomladna_ofenziva_1918.svg edit

 

  • Nomination Spring offensive, Ludendorff Offensive, Kaiserschlacht, 1918 --Goran tek-en 19:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Too small, sorry. --Tournasol7 04:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
      Comment Vector image. Any size is possible. --Knopik-som 10:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good map, and note the 2,560 × 1,585 pixels option. -- Ikan Kekek 08:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC
  •   Comment But Goran tek-en, please correct the COM:OVERCAT. I will temporarily cross out my vote in a couple of days, otherwise. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC))
  •   Oppose for now, due to overcat. -- Ikan Kekek 23:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Milseburg 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Klingenmünster_Burgruine_Landeck_(Denkmalzone)_020_2017_07_14.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View from Landeck Castle to the southeast on the Rhine Rift Valley, framed by a window niche
    --F. Riedelio 12:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Imo the choice of focus is not the best, I think the landscape should be sharp(er), not the windows. Perhaps a larger aperture would have been useful? --Nefronus 05:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
      New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 14:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
    An effort has surely been made, but I think it is not effectively possible to fix this by unsharpening the sharp and sharpening the unsharp. Since my initial comment may have looked like editing suggestion, I shall let others decide. --Nefronus 20:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
    I disagree. Let us discuss. --F. Riedelio 09:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment The first version looks sharper than the revision, and also brighter. So I don't understand what the basis was for the revision. Maybe the white balance had been a little off, but I feel like the edit went a little off track. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment The basis for the revision was the review of Nefronus.
    Because I don't like it either I uploaded the old improved version again. --F. Riedelio 15:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm unsure whether the original or the latest edit is better, and I'm not certain about the white balance, but I wasn't there, you were, and it looks plausible to me. -- Ikan Kekek 23:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Milseburg 11:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)