Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 02 2014

Consensual review edit

File:MÁV V43 and ZSSK Class 350 in Budapest-Keleti pályaudvar. - 14-05-06-budapest-RalfR-04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Budapest Keleti pu. station; Locomotive 431 --Ralf Roletschek 10:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. Small DoF, but IMO still QI. --XRay 06:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Mostly out of focus. --Mattbuck 21:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Low DOF, but ok --High Contrast 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Mattbuck and overexposed background, and purple CA top left --Christian Ferrer 15:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. I kindly request reviewers to be maybe more careful a little ! We have here a lot of very visible   chromatic aberration, not only at top left, but at top right too, a no-go for a QI, IMO. BtW, there is a dead pixel near the step of the front locomotive...--Jebulon 14:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 14:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Militaergeographisches Institut Globus Wien DSC 10171w.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Former Institute of Military Geography, facade detail, Vienna --P e z i 18:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. A bit soft, but difficult shot at 450mm --DXR 19:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)  Oppose for now. Is our poor earth so oval ? A correction is needed, IMO.--Jebulon 20:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 21:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Not perfect, but better. It works for QI. Thanks for correction.--Jebulon 14:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 14:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Orange tip female (Anthocharis cardamines).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Orange tip female butterfly (Anthocharis cardamines) --Charlesjsharp 21:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blur wingtip, blur head (!), noisy background. --Graphium 17:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Enough for QI. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Festiwal_Naadam_na_stepie_na_obrzeżach_Ułan_Bator_33.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Naadam festival on the steppe, on the outskirts of Ulan Bator. Mongolia. Mongolian horses and riders. --Halavar 15:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality, LouiXXXII 09:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - noisy, too high contrast. Mattbuck 22:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
      Info You were right. I fixed those problems and I uploaded new version, hope it's better now. --Halavar 13:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
    You've gone from noisy to posterised, and the contrast and white balance problems are still apparent. Mattbuck 21:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Mattbuck.--Jebulon 14:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 14:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Krajobraz_w_Parku_Narodowym_Gorchi-Tereldż_33.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Landscape. Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia. --Halavar 22:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yellowish color cast. Looks more natural with white balance taken from bright clouds on the left edge. --Sitacuisses 08:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
You again with colours... Can you imagine, that not everywhere colours of landscape and sky looks the same? Especially in the end of the day? I have wrong time in my images from Mongolia, so this image was taken after 6 PM. If you ever have been in Mongolia, then you should know, what are the natural colours in that country. Hope to see your images soon (of course with proper, natural colours) :) --Halavar 17:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Please answer the questions I asked on your talk page, rather than make up lame excuses. There are plenty of realistic pictures of Mongolia available, and several persons told you that your colours are off. --Sitacuisses 19:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support  Oppose White balance problems and yellow channel satured --The Photographer 17:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 13:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:P-konyaeva-2014-2013.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Festive evening «We inherited the victory» in the «Ganshin manor» museum. --PereslavlFoto 16:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 14:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Flash too harsh IMO --Poco a poco 08:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Excellent portrait, which makes that I can live with the flash harshness. --Cayambe 09:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - harsh flash and not particularly sharp. Mattbuck 10:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No problem with the flash light for me, but indeed, it is not sharp enough. Sorry.--Jebulon 14:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 14:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 07 M5.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The M5 in Clapton-in-Gordano. Mattbuck 06:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Graphium 09:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unbalanced composition, large parts lacking sufficient detail. --Sitacuisses 14:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
    The composition felt balanced to me, the idea of the photo is to have the motorway lit up and the rest only having reflected light. Mattbuck 16:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
    In a good night shot I'd expect some more detail in the darker parts. The picture's dynamics are concentrated to the right side; the left third is too dark and somehow useless. It would probably look better if the light lines would all start at the horizontal edge, not some of them at the right side and some at the bottom. The image also seems to be tilted, that's my impression confirmed by the arrows on the road signs. The subject is nothing special and easy to replicate; try again with some more daylight left or longer exposure time to get more overall detail. Finally, there are a few hotpixels. --Sitacuisses 05:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Some noise in the sky (see note). But its ok for me IMHO --The Photographer 17:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Great picture ! Jacek Halicki 09:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support The traffic on the street could have been more busy ;-) But all in all a very good photograph. --High Contrast 14:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
    Unfortunately it was May, so the late night necessary for the light didn't lend itself to heavy traffic. Mattbuck 16:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --VT98Fan 19:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)