Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 03 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Kot_domowy_w_Kryspinowie_pod_Krakowem,_20210523_0832_6807.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Domestic cat in Kryspinów near Kraków --Jakubhal 19:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Imehling 19:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose need better categories --Geoprofi Lars 14:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment With your contributions it has more categories than any other QI cat on commons. And I've just replaced that "unidentified cats" with two more. What else is missing? --Jakubhal 13:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support For me is fine --Commonists 21:32, 27 May 2021(UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Further to Jakubhal's remarks: Pretty cat and good quality, but "1 mammal" is definitely overcat. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
    • I've removed that one. I agree the color category may be useful here and I've added one after Lars's updates. But mammals categories are obviously too much. --Jakubhal 11:07, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 01:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Duomo_Cattedrale_Santo_Stefano_facciata_Prato.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Facade of Cattedrale di Santo Stefano in Prato. --Moroder 08:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Distorted perspective. --F. Riedelio 15:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. Photo taken from below--Lmbuga 15:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per lmbuga. An enforced verticalisation would lead to a completely absurd presentation. --Smial 07:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. I really like this Duomo and I've been enjoying this series. -- Ikan Kekek 08:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial’s explanation. --Aristeas 08:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Stradone_dei_Giardini_in_the_Vatican_City.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stradone dei Giardini in the Vatican City (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Sorry, the composition doesn't work for me. The left lower part of the picture is rather boring (parking lots, asphalt, some trees), the facade is in the shade. --Imehling 18:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I disagree. It's not a candidate for FP. The Theme of this image is a street, so yes; it's parking lots and asphalt. Someone find it boring, but it show the reality. --Tournasol7 20:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK per above comment. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Interesting view of the Cortile della Pigna --Moroder 05:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Interesting view and good quality --Jakubhal 04:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. --Aristeas 08:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

George-peabody-library.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination George Peabody Library interior in Baltimore, Maryland --Sdkb 20:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • CA should be removed and the distortion fixed. --Ermell 20:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Because CAs is remaning as said by Ermell. --Sebring12Hrs 19:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose +1. --Peulle 10:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support. Note the removal of the CA. -- Ikan Kekek 06:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support So noted. --Peulle 17:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 21:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC))