Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 05 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Osrednjedolenjska delavsko-kmečka hiša z mansardo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Peasant house in Slovenia. --PetarM 15:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough IMHO. --Domob 09:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. Sharp enough for me. --MB-one 15:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support A description in English would be fine. --Palauenc05 07:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 09:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharp enough, good quality Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Slight blurring noise reduction and slight oversharpening, but good composition, colours, and lighting. Acceptable. --Smial 09:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 10:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Hôtel_Ville_St_Denis_Seine_St_Denis_4.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Town hall of Saint-Denis, Seine-Saint-Denis in France. --Chabe01 10:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion *   Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
      OpposeI disagree. Slight perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 12:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
      Comment I don't think we should overdo it. -- Spurzem 15:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very small perspective issues, but okay for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think perspective correction needed too. Waiting other POV. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok for QI in my eyes. --Milseburg 11:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Milseburg 19:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)