Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 08 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Silcherstraße_5_in_Tübingen_02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hospitalbuilding in Tübingen --Dktue 09:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Cut tree, poor exposure. --Remontees 22:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Exposure and composition are OK, but it is slightly tilted CW. Fixable. --C messier 21:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree that this looks underexposed.--Peulle 11:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined XRay 05:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Ναός_Σωτήρος,_Κουνάβοι_0520.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The church of Transfiguration in Kounavi, Crete. --C messier 20:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose The photographed object is cut off at the sides + irrelevant photo name. --Remontees 21:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Name OK and photo good enough for QI. --XRay 08:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per XRay. --Aristeas 11:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay-- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Ναός_Ευαγγελισμού,_Σαϊτούρες_5300.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The church of Annuciation of the Virgin in Saitoures, Crete. --C messier 20:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Irrelevant photo name + composition that focuses more on the square than the church. --Remontees 21:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Irrelevant photo name + focuses more on the square than the church. --Remontees 22:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Voting twice for one image is not possible. --Palauenc05 22:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO good enough for QI. --XRay 08:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per XRay. --Aristeas 11:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support OK. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't see a problem with the "photo name" (I guess it's the file name) and the composition --Moroder 09:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Θύρωμα_στον_Μούντρο_Ρεθύμνου_5357.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Old portal in Moundros, Crete. --C messier 20:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Irrelevant photo name + poor composition. --Remontees 22:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Yes, minor CAs. (Should be fixed.) No reason for decline. --XRay 08:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 10:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per XRay and Palauenc05. --Aristeas 11:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Kornbergertor.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Kornbergertor --Linie29 11:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Good quality, but   chromatic aberrations--Lmbuga 11:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Subject not properly centred in the photo. --Remontees 22:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No need for centering, IMO good enough for QI. --XRay 08:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 10:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 21:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice composition and good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Λότζια_Ρεθύμνου_6487.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Loggia of Rethymno. --C messier 18:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose In my opinion: lack of light + poor composition. --Remontees 22:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 10:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for an evening shot --Moroder 09:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Moroder -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Rue_Saint-Christophe_in_Sauveterre-de-R_02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Rue Saint-Christophe in Sauveterre-de-R., Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Poor exposure and composition. --Remontees 22:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good enough for QI. --XRay 08:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, overcast day. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 08:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Mouvaux_centre_spirituel_du_hautmont.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Centre spirituel du Hautmont, Rue Mirabeau 31, Mouvaux, France --Velvet 07:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The composition of the photo is not sufficiently focused on the building. --Remontees 22:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Clearly good photo to me. Where the ideal place to crop the foreground would be is good to argue about at FPC; here, it's sufficient to say it's a subtlety in this kind of situation and a matter of taste. -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support More than OK. --Aristeas 10:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good Quality --PsamatheM 09:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per others -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Flotte-de-Mini-6.50-à-Lorient-0102.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Fleet of Mini6.50 sailboats at Lorient --Pline 16:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A little bit tilted. --Remontees 22:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Can't see a disturbing tilt. Ships usually aren't vertical. --XRay 08:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 09:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay-- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Town_hall_in_Lodeve_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Town hall in Lodeve, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Poor composition. --Remontees 22:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good image. --Tagooty 15:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per XRay-- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Via_del_Portico_d'Ottavia_46_in_Rome.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Building at Via del Portico d'Ottavia 46 in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Poor exposure. --Remontees 22:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan Kekek -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted XRay 05:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Tiber_river_at_Lungotevere_de'_Cenci.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tiber river at Lungotevere de' Cenci in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Partly blurred+poor exposure. --Remontees 22:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me --Moroder 06:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 08:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)