Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 15 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Way_to_Gupteshwor_Mahadev_Cave.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Gupteshwor Mahadev Cave --Bijay chaurasia 08:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good Quality--बिप्लब आनन्द 13:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, please third opinion: it's rather unsharp --A.Savin 13:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp and head-cut of the person on the stair is a no-go. --Cccefalon 21:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The stairs are not sharp at any point. --Peulle 12:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Ford_Mustang_May_2016_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 1966 Ford Mustang. --ArildV 19:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Unfavorable lighting with disturbing shadows. -- Spurzem 21:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --A.Savin 02:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 15:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Quality is good enough for a Q1photo. Arild reduced shadows, it might look unnatural but I think it improves the photo --Michielverbeek 22:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose.There should have been time enough to look for a better position and maybe get there earlier to have better light.--Ermell 08:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment Its not my car and I dont know the owner or where and when he/she use to park the car. --ArildV 08:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose the simplest rule: take a look to the shadows/light. --Alchemist-hp 21:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)