Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 15 2018

Consensual review edit

File:Río_Copper,_Glennallen,_Alaska,_Estados_Unidos,_2017-08-22,_DD_109-112_PAN.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Copper River, Glennallen, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 17:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm not sure, whether the alignment of the horizon is right here. It looks arched. --Milseburg 17:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   CommentI've uploaded a new version Poco a poco 09:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Better, but I I´m really not convinced. I thing it´s still bulged to the middle. --Milseburg 12:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I've uploaded a new version, take it or leave it :) Poco a poco 19:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, that´s it. I was convinced, you can make it. I take it and love it. --Milseburg 19:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted

File:Westensee Sonnenuntergang msu 2018-6034.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sonnenuntergang am Westensee im Landschaftsschutzgebiet WestenseelandschaftDieses Bild zeigt das Schutzgebiet in der World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) mit der Nummer 555552348 --Matthias Süßen 13:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Overall nice. Please, remove spots on the sky (birds or insects trace) --George Chernilevsky 14:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC).
@George Chernilevsky: Insects. They were definitely insects. Mosquitoes stung me all night. Now I killed them here, too. --Matthias Süßen 15:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose What about the lens flares? They are a bit disturbing, aren't they? --Milseburg 17:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  • So let´s here other opinions. --Milseburg 18:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please upload a not downscaled version (it looks like downscaled) and please fix the filename. --XRay 06:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @XRay: it's not scaled down. I only had to shoot it into sRAW because my memory card was almost full. With sRaw, the camera fires with 6.0 megapixels (3000 x 2000). Can I ask you what's wrong with the file name? --Matthias Süßen 08:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  • "Sonnenunergang" instead of "Sonnenuntergang", the "t". Should I fix it? --XRay 08:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @XRay: Ah. Ok got it. Thanks for pointing that out. I had some problems with my Apple keyboard. I renamed the file. --Matthias Süßen 08:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   weak support Acceptable quality. I'm not sure it's possible to avoide the flares in a shot like this one; they become a feature, a part of the scene. Does this make sense?--Peulle 14:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 19:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Beautiful, and I will support if you get rid of the lens flares, not with them. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 14:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   weak support per Peulle -- DerFussi 09:39, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful and good -- Spurzem 13:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO good enough. Nice composition. --XRay 05:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose because of rather low resolution and slight overexposure. Not because of the flares, that's ok in such lighting situation. Fun fact: in digitally generated scenes, such reflections are often artificially created to simulate a natural and photorealistic impression ;-) --Smial 13:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Per Peulle --Billy69150 11:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 12:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)