Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 30 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Rainbow_trout,_Sikkim_AJTJ_DSCN6530.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from Sikkim. By User:Ajtjohnsingh --PJeganathan 16:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. Disgusting, bad composition, no QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ermell, good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 06:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Spurzem --Milseburg 09:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK. --A.Savin 13:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Spurzem --MirandaAdramin 21:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Seems OK to me. Disgusting how? -- Ikan Kekek 09:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  Comment Ok, "distgusting" is not the point here for me, but the comosition don´t make a QI. The cut person does not give a good background. --Milseburg 11:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  Question - Why not? The person is holding the fish. You think it would be better to show the person's head? I think that would draw attention away from the fish. -- Ikan Kekek 18:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Anyway persons are a problematic background for fish-motifs, I think. --Milseburg 12:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me - Vengolis 14:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Oppose on grounds of composition. Just for the record, I feel using words like "disgusting" in an image review is highly inappropriate. PumpkinSky 16:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lacking in detail. If the composition should have been accepted, everything else would have had to be perfect and it's not.--Peulle 16:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per others, nice catch but the picture is not QI to me --Cvmontuy 17:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Just wanted to thank everyone for your reviews on this image. Don't really care whether this image selected for QI or not, but would appreciate if words such as "disgusting" are not used here in this forum. Thanks Ikan Kekek and PumpkinSky for pointing this out.--PJeganathan 08:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose →   Declined   --W.carter 09:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)