Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 06 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Obereggenen_-_Evangelische_Kirche3.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Obereggenen: Protestant Church, bell tower --Taxiarchos228 21:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
    Tilted clockwise IMO. Mattbuck 18:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Not done. --Mattbuck 23:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
    this image is not tilted, you choose a wrong benchmark. BTW: didn't you say you wouldn't make any comments on my picture? Was apparently just nuts. --Taxiarchos228 19:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:McLaren_MP4-12C_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_004.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Une McLaren MP4-12C présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Picture doesn't mean much imho --Arctic Kangaroo 17:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    I'm changing to discuss because I think the decline reason given by User:Arctic Kangaroo is not valid under QI rules. However, I do agree that at present, the composition is not great. Please either show the full car or crop more off on the left to balance it out a bit. --Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:McLaren_MP4-12C_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_006.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Une McLaren MP4-12C présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Picture doesn't mean much imho --Arctic Kangaroo 17:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    I'm changing to discuss because I think the decline reason given by User:Arctic Kangaroo is not valid under QI rules. That said,   Oppose due to bad focus. --Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:McLaren_P1_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_005.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Une McLaren P1 présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Picture doesn't mean much imho --Arctic Kangaroo 17:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    I'm changing to discuss because I think the decline reason given by User:Arctic Kangaroo is not valid under QI rules. I think this one is ok -   Support. --Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support ok from me Pleclown 12:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Mazda_6_-_Mondial_de_l'automobile_2012_-_004.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination La Mazda 6 présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile 2012 à Paris. --Thesupermat 07:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion It looks weird with this closeup from an awkward angle. Perhaps shooting it from the front would have been better. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    It needs a fix for chromatic noise, but the shot otherwise is fine. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support ok from me Pleclown 12:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Mazda_6_-_Mondial_de_l'automobile_2012_-_005.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination La Mazda 6 présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile 2012 à Paris. --Thesupermat 07:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion It looks weird with this closeup from an awkward angle. Perhaps shooting it from the front would have been better. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    Seems ok to me. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support ok from me Pleclown 12:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Maize_field_in_Bavaria_in_Summer_2013.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination A Maize field in Bavaria in Summer 2013. --High Contrast 20:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like it, but I'm not convinced by the focus.   Weak support Mattbuck 00:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Drewniana_architektura_w_Irkucku_36.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination The wooden house. Irkutsk, Russia. --Halavar 20:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose In my opinion, in this image, horizontal lines must be stright. Pincushion Barrel distortion IMO (see notes): I'm not sure -Lmbuga 02:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Lake railway station MMB 03 483007.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 483007 departs Lake. Mattbuck 10:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • IMO, the angle is not very good. I find that it would be better if it were shot something like this. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    QIC not FPC :) I see no quality issues. Probably the top of the train could be slightly sharper. Let's discuss. --Tuxyso 16:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    It's a single track line, there is only one platform, your idea (I assume you want concave rather than convex) would be impossible AK. Mattbuck 23:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry but DoF issue, too much part of the image is unsharp IMO Christian Ferrer 07:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Сип_белоголовый.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) in the zoo, Rostov-on-don, Russia. --Zhanett.b 05:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality --Halavar 17:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Good, but with large size the picture has a little white border above and to the right--Lmbuga 00:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose: Definitely needs the white borders removed before it can be promoted to QI. I'll be happy to reverse my vote once it has been fixed, as the image is otherwise of excellent quality. --DAJF 09:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good now. Maybe DAJF and Lmbuga could have another look ?--Jebulon 14:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Indeed, good --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support A comment is not a vote, please. Good now--Lmbuga 11:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good now. Definitely a quality image. --DAJF 01:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Łódź_na_Bajkale_w_Listwiance.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Boat on Lake Baikal. Listvyanka, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 23:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Hermosa iluminación, colores y reflejo. --Ivan2010 14:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose poor sharpness --A.Savin 19:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Info Added sharpness. --Halavar 01:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Sharpening doesn't improve detail. If the detail is poor (e.g. due to poor focusing, or motion blur), it remains poor. --A.Savin 10:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sharpness is OK with me, but imo white balance is not correct (green cast). Also it has CCW tilt (the line between an object and its reflection should be vertical). --Iifar 18:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Improvable--Lmbuga 04:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too softened (denoising too strong, IMO.) --Jebulon 14:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Храм_Армянской_Апостольской_церкви_Святого_Вардана_Мамиконяна_городе_Кисловодске.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Armenian Apostolic Church of St. Vardan Mamikonyan in the city of Kislovodsk, Stavropol region, Russia. --Zhanett.b 13:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Support Interesante composicion e iluminacion. --Ivan2010 15:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose insufficient quality, perspective distortions --A.Savin 20:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose: Needs perspective adjustment. --DAJF 09:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Hormuzakia-aggregata-Wikipedia-001i.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hormuzakia aggregata. --MathKnight 21:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 10:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The focus is not on any of the flowers. --Uoaei1 19:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, F:4 is not the better to this kind of pictures. Oversharpened: the oversharpened (IMO) background is disturbing (artifacts). Probably noise--Lmbuga 20:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose: The plant/flower blends too much into the background. Sorry, but I don't think this is quite QI material. --DAJF 09:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:14-02-04-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-161.jpg edit

  • Nomination European Parliament, Strasbourg --Ralf Roletschek 12:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
      Comment Nice imo when two slight stiching errors are fixed (see note, please). --JLPC 18:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)  OK, its fixed. --Ralf Roletschek 08:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose Sorry, but it's not very sharp, and the perspective at the edges makes me feel seasick. --Mattbuck 18:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree - let it discuss. --~~~~
  •   Support Looks good to me. --DAJF 01:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurry faces. As Mattbuck--Lmbuga 04:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurry. Tilted (See the flag).--Jebulon 14:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Kaisergebirge_von_Aschau_im_Winter_01.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Kaiser Mountains (Tyrol, Austria) --Uoaei1 20:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Not in focus. --Mattbuck 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
    Changed to discussion by Uoaeil1. Mattbuck 23:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
    Right, I would like to ask for more opinions. --Uoaei1 09:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough, very nice composition --Moroder 10:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Too much bland sky (composition, rule of thirds)--Lmbuga 20:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
      Done Changed the crop and format changed accordingly --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral The dark trees are in focus IMO (is suitable?, perhaps it's not). I see other problem, the left area of the image is blurry because the focus is on right. Hearing other users, I can change my vote--Lmbuga 12:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 23:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Chichibu-railway-7001-20090505.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: A Chichibu Railway 7000 series EMU train in Japan (by LERK) --DAJF 05:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Oppose - Too noisy and the sky is a bit too bright IMO --Poco a poco 07:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support - It looks OK to me, so I would like to ask for a third opinion. --DAJF 23:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Poco. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support - The sky is bright, but it doesn't appear to be overexposed. I see no noise problems. Mattbuck 21:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 23:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Rösrath-Denkmal-92_Hauptstrasse-104_Turbinenanlage.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Housing of the Fontaine water turbine, a listed monument in Rösrath, Germany --Cccefalon 17:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment The dark shadow on the building is disturbing and I think some reviewers could be in trouble to judge the German description --Moroder 13:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment It's not actually overexposed, but that white wall does appear to be glowing. Mattbuck 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment I added an english description. But actually, I think both other comments are not really helpful. I ask for another opinion. Thank you. --Cccefalon 09:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Unfortunately spoiled by the high contrast between the shadow on the left and the almost blown-out white wall. --DAJF 07:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable. Though the white wall is near clipping, it is not really disturbing. --Smial 15:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with DAJF.--Jebulon 14:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 23:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)