Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 07 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Citadel of Qaitbay 024.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Citadel of Qaitbay, Egypt.--لا روسا 22:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Slightly inclined to the right. Description and categories are missing. --Zcebeci 11:30, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  • sorry, bad categorization and description shouldn´t be a reason for declining. Already there was an arabic description and category of Cultural heritage monuments in Egypt 2014, because this photo was a part of Wiki love monuments in Egypt. Now, i add en and es description also.--لا روسا 15:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not voting against your picture, just want to tell than categorization IS a requirement for QI: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description" --Shansov.net 03:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The building is leaning to the right. The crop ist too tight at the top and on the right side. The verticals are not rectilinear. Too much space at the bottom as well. JPEG quality isn't as good as it should be, lots of artefacts. Sorry, nice weather and nice subject but not a QI. --Code 06:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. The level of detail might barely be acceptable though it’s really not good, but the tight crop and the perspective issues kill it for me. --Kreuzschnabel 06:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too much inclined --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Lack of fine detail, bad perspective. Mattbuck 20:40, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 08:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)