Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 10 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Meshvo_Dam.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Shamlaji, Gujarat, India--Vijay B. Barot 03:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good qualty. --GT1976 03:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Lack of sharpness/detail. --Milseburg 11:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Some CAs and a lack of sharpness. --PtrQs 22:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Zaadpluizen_grote_lisdodde_(Typha_latifolia)._Locatie,_Natuurterrein_De_Famberhorst_(d.j.b.)_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Seed Fluff bulrush (Typha latifolia). Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
    --Famberhorst 06:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 07:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much overexposed on the plant. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Outstanding sharpness. Maybe it's just slightly bright, but still IMO a very good QI, and probably a strong FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek 11:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overexposed, no QI.--Fischer.H 18:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 20:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support likewise --GerifalteDelSabana 06:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose --Badly overexposed. --Buddpaul 21:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good example for sharpness. --PtrQs 23:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support In my opinion a very good and sharp photograph --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good to me --Poco a poco 14:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Poco a poco 14:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)