Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 10 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Ushuaia,_Paseo_de_la_Castorera.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ushuaia_,Paseo_de_la_Castorera - Oviedo9-- 22:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. -- Mirkov35 11:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Mirkov35 15:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough --LexKurochkin 12:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurry --Milseburg 18:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Also, minor point, but Category:Ushuaia is COM:OVERCAT. -- Ikan Kekek 07:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very nice composition, but not sharp enough even at A4 size. --Smial 11:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 21:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Ακρόπολη_Σμαρίου_0523.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The ancient acropolis over Smari, Crete. --C messier 21:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Question Do you have this with a wider crop? Because the wall at the bottom is cut. --Tesla Delacroix 15:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support IMO the photo is QI. --LexKurochkin 12:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Lex. Definitely good enough for a view from above, IMO. But I'm not sure why this is in CR, since no-one has opposed so far. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment I set the "Discuss" status since I was not sure if the first question is opposing or not. --LexKurochkin 08:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment A question is not an opposing vote, and I would let the discussion play out for a while before voting, but then just change the status to "Promotion". -- Ikan Kekek 20:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 21:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Teintes_grises_rue_Michel_Rondet.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Grey shades rue Michel Rondet at en:Saint-Étienne, France. --Touam 20:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose The person should be either completly blurry or sharp. --MB-one 21:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't know what others will think, but I find this photo OK. -- Ikan Kekek 03:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sorry for my english. Ok the person is blurry. My idea was to catch the grey things in the street, which are little things on each day. There is this person just in time, and she's blurry, cause she is moving, but I think this "fantom" is also a good correspondance with the street. But I perhaps make a mistake. What you think ? Thank you in advance for your vote. --Touam 05:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Your English is fine (we spell that word "phantom", or we could call her a "ghost"), and I agree with you. -- Ikan Kekek 14:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I don't mind, that the person is blurry. But I do mind, that it is partially blurry and partially sharp. That, I consider to be a defect. --MB-one 19:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I understand your point of view. -- Ikan Kekek 22:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan --Moroder 09:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support When a human being walks, at any given moment different parts of the body move with different speeds, it is physically inevitable, and hence the motion blur we see is not the same for different body parts. --LexKurochkin 07:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)