Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 19 2014
-
- Nomination Die Schwebefähre über den Nord-Ostsee-Kanal in Rendsburg. Sie ist eine von nur acht Schwebefähren weltweit. --Nightflyer 22:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 22:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Steinmühle-Wehr in Marburg --Hydro 19:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blur, ground at the centre of the photo is overexposed. --Arctic Kangaroo 19:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lenin Square. Yalta, Crimea. --Halavar 18:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blurness, CAs. --Arctic Kangaroo 19:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno --Jacek Halicki 18:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support QI for me --Halavar 20:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Anticipating willow twig (Salix).--
Famberhorst 16:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Anticipating willow twig (Salix).--
-
- Nomination Parish church of Saint Joseph in Zabrzeg, Poland --Halavar 15:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Herzogshof in Graz. --MrPanyGoff 13:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Epitaph exhibited on the walls of the Grazer Dom. --MrPanyGoff 12:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 13:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Anacapri, Villa San Michele, fragment in a wall --Berthold Werner 11:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 12:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotunda Church of Xewkija, Gozo, Malta --Cccefalon 10:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Church leaning slightly to the right --Halavar 12:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Done Thanks, please have another look. --Cccefalon 14:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Support Better, but I think it's still not perfect straight, but it's OK and image can be QI --Halavar 15:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Sandakan, Sabah: Hotel Tulip and Hotel Seafront at the intersection of Jalan Leila, Jalan Singapora, Jalan Elopura. --Cccefalon 10:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Meets the criteria imo. I think that you should mention the country in the description.--MrPanyGoff 12:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palais Niederösterreich in Vienna. --MrPanyGoff 10:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Tuxyso 10:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The small islet Strömsborg in Stockholm. --ArildV 10:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Perspective correction on the right is not perfect. Take another look on the verticals. --Tuxyso 10:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks, Done --ArildV 12:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
OK now. --Tuxyso 21:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Brice Lalonde, at a meeting, in Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 09:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Could you make the vertical of the black/green area rectilinear? And also applying a little bit denoising for the green area? The portrait itself is good for QI. --Cccefalon 10:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Info Done. --ComputerHotline 10:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
much better :) thanks! --Cccefalon 10:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination COA of Count Andreas Jakob von Dietrichstein at parish church Saint Rupert, Lend, Salzburg --Herzi Pinki 08:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Holy family at parish church Saint Rupert, Lend, Salzburg --Herzi Pinki 08:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 12:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salak fruits (Salacca zalacca) at the Kundasang Vegetable Market --Cccefalon 08:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Not 100% convincing crop/angle, but ok --Poco a poco 08:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pasar Ekonomi at the intersection Jalan Elopura, Jalan Dua in Sandakan --Cccefalon 08:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination --مانفی 08:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, although we appreciate a description here in English --Poco a poco 08:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination --مانفی 08:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough for a studio shot; the writing on the plektrum is barely readable.. --Cccefalon 08:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for review, It maybe not perfectly sharp but the unreadable pars is quite small. It is almost impossible to make a 20 character text readable, in 75 in 8 pixels area.~~~~
-
- Nomination Albarracín Cathedral, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 08:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --A.Savin 12:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santiago Square, Daroca, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 08:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs perspective correction. I also would crop the bottom a little bit tighter to avoid the red strip --Cccefalon 09:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Done Poco a poco 18:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old iron railway bridge over the Pancrudo river, Luco de Jiloca, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 08:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Dust stop on the right top corner --A.Savin 12:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Done Poco a poco 18:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Support OK --A.Savin 22:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moros, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 08:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, interesting light. --Tuxyso 10:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basaltic Prisms, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 08:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:17, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Münster (Westphalia), House at Horsteberg (Cathedral Square) --XRay 08:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Münster (Westphalia), Liudgerhaus (left), Diocesan Library (right) and Überwasserkirche (background) --XRay 08:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fisherman, Étang de Thau, Hérault --Christian Ferrer 06:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Cloisters, Gloucester --Saffron Blaze 04:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion The right is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 06:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Support Very, very good! Could be a FP candidate, but pls. do perspective correction as suggested by Christian Ferrer. --Uoaei1 19:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Done Saffron Blaze 02:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antenna of Retevisión at the top of Mount Pedroso. Santiago Compostela. Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 00:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building of Retevisión at the top of Mount Pedroso. Santiago Compostela. Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 00:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The main entrance of the HFF in Munich, Germany. --High Contrast 23:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, but: please add the geo location. --XRay 07:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Done --High Contrast 20:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wing underside view of a couple of eastern festoon butterfly. --Zeynel Cebeci 23:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Oversharpened, pixellation, blurness etc. You should also have gone directly in front of the mating pair to shoot it. --Arctic Kangaroo 18:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Linderhof --Saffron Blaze 18:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 15:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clevedon --Saffron Blaze 16:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose looks overprocessed: haloes --A.Savin 12:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination View of Lake Baikal. Listvyanka, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 12:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blur. --Arctic Kangaroo 18:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The cycle lane at the Längenfeldgasse, Vienna. View is totally blocked by the advertisement column. Coming from the other side you will see the traffic sign much too late. --Herzi Pinki 21:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Commentsome overexposed areas at the "Litfaßsäule" und the traffic sign. Can perhaps be solved with RAW converter. --P e z i 16:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Comment thx, uploaded a new version, not sure, which one is better. --Herzi Pinki 14:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
QI, but a bit dark now. --P e z i 22:15, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Bayon, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 20:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 18:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination The Rifugio Passo Sella in the year 2009 and the Sella Group, Dolomites - South Tyrol --Moroder 21:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Good but it needs a ccw tilt and -I guess- some perspective correction (see right side), the crop is also on the right improvable Poco a poco 21:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Info Thanks for the review but I don't see any problems with the vertical lines --Moroder 21:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Done Btw I improved the crop on the right, thanks for the suggestion --Moroder 14:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The Rifugio Passo Sella in the year 2009 and the Sella Group, Dolomites - South Tyrol --Moroder 21:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Worker is dusting the huge candelabras in the Putra Mosque in Malaysia --Cccefalon 14:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. Really interesting --Lewis Hulbert 19:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure that it can be QI, but only the 20% or 30% of the picture is sharp, and its a criteria of Cccefalon to decline if it's a 20% blurry--Lmbuga 01:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
As already mentioned in your long posting at your reviewed photo Claustro_da_Catedral_de_La_Seu_d'Urgell._Cataluña_2014-2.jpg in the March 11 section, the focus of my proposal was a 20% dark wall at the left side. --Cccefalon 10:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers and buds of the addersmeat or greater stitchwort (Stellaria holostea). --Blackerking 13:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 18:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Japanese (Ussuri Manchu) Grus (Grus japonensis) in the zoo in Rostov-on-Don, Russia --Zhanett.b 10:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blur. --Arctic Kangaroo 18:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination One of the decorative pilars on Jambatan Seri Gemilang in Putrajaya, Malaysia --Cccefalon 23:17, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Please have a look to the top of the image. There are dust spots.--XRay 07:58, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Done, I removed two. Thanks for the hint. --Cccefalon 09:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Support Thanks. Fine.--XRay 07:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination A row of wooden kelongs (fishermen's huts on stilts) which forms the backdrop for the Songs of the Sea musical fountain at Sentosa, Singapore. --Poco a poco 19:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloister of the Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell. Catalonia-2 --Lmbuga 20:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn The really disturbing issue at this photo is the 20% blurry, dark wall at the left. I proposed a 1:1 crop to rescue the nice motif. See my annotations. --Cccefalon 06:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, It's only a image. I like it as it is. 20% blurry is very good if it's in background, ...normaly. No criteria IMO (it's my opinion), but I could withdraw the picture because it's only a picture, one picture--Lmbuga 01:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC). Withdrawn, but why? I don't understand, but I don't want problems with users--Lmbuga 01:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
To clarify the situation: I have no personal problems with you. No problems henceforth--Lmbuga 01:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
The picture has a problem to be QI IMO, but you don't say it: Reflections on upper part of left column--Lmbuga 01:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
What would happen if all the images that have 50% (not 20%) of blurred areas was refused or declined when the subject is good?--Lmbuga 01:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Others will judge you as you judge--Lmbuga 01:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Info Good morning, Lmbuga, I think, I gave a good reason how to enhance the photo because I saw a relevant issue. My review focussed almost on the dark wall. I don't understand this big talk here. Perhaps, we should ask some other users here about the dark wall on the left side? I also do not want to give you any stress here. I think, the best solution is, that I will skip your photos in future while reviewing, ok? --Cccefalon 09:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Sorry, more words in your talk page--Lmbuga 21:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuala Lumpur Police Contingent Headquarters. --Cccefalon 17:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Good but the building (see left side) is not straight, probably tilt+perspective correction needed Poco a poco 11:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Done You are right. Thank you, I uploaded a new version. Please have another look. --Cccefalon 14:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Right side is not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 18:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Kuala Lumpur Police Contingent Headquarters. --Cccefalon 17:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg)
_01.JPG)
.jpg)
_%D0%B6%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D1%8C_(Grus_japonensis).jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review edit
File:Posthorn, Inn sign, Murnau, Bavaria, Germany.jpg edit
- Nomination A post horn as inn sign, Murnau am Staffelsee, Bavaria, Germany.--Jebulon 15:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment The sky needs some cleaning --A.Savin 13:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support I do not see the need of cleaning the sky. QI for me --Halavar 15:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, no speedy promotion with this version. Dust spots (also a big one below the horn), some white spots. Check the whole sky and you will find it all. Very easy to fix. --A.Savin 17:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, A.Savin, but I need your help. Could you please annotate the issues, as I can't find them ? Thank you. --Jebulon 15:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done. --A.Savin 16:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: Done. I've removed some spots. But white "lines" are due to the sun reflections on a spider web (see notes). Hope it is good now. --Jebulon 11:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, A.Savin, but I need your help. Could you please annotate the issues, as I can't find them ? Thank you. --Jebulon 15:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good now. --A.Savin 12:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good now--Lmbuga 22:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --A.Savin 12:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Katie_Green,_Nikon_Solutions_Expo,_2008_(crop).jpg edit
.jpg)
- Nomination Portrait of English model Katie Green, posing at the Nikon Solutions Exposition in December 2008. By User:Keraunoscopia --Blurred Lines 12:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Support QI for me --Halavar 13:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Oppose Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. --Steinsplitter 14:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Not eligible as the QI status, because it is a derivative work of an original not made by a wikimedian. + very noticeable CA on the crown.--Jebulon 15:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Jebulon, plus eyes out of focus (focal plane is somewhat about her ear). --Kreuzschnabel 16:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Widok_z_Listwianki_na_jezioro_Bajkał_04.JPG edit
- Nomination View of Lake Baikal. Listvyanka, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 12:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline The sand is gone due to overexposure --Poco a poco 18:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Info New version uploaded with fixed overexposure. Please look again or maybe we need other opinions --Halavar 20:44, 10 March 2014 (UTC) - Oppose As Savin, but I think that the sand it's blown out. Bluesish IMO. Perhaps too saturated--Lmbuga 02:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Vista_de_Pachuca,_Hidalgo,_México,_2013-10-10,_DD_02.JPG edit
- Nomination View of Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 09:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment in spanish El cielo no es interesante y, al igual que las casas en primer plano, despista la atención que se debería tener sobre el sujeto de la imagen. Yo recortaría la imagen tal como en la nota. Si estás de acuerdo, es una clara imagen de calidad en mi opinión--Lmbuga 12:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Done, aunque creo que es más cuestión de gustos que de calidad Poco a poco 18:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion
{{neutral}}OK (I don't think like you), other users can opine: I don't like the composition: Too much sky in the new version (also in the other version). Centered horizon. It needs a crop (sky) IMO. Improvable, but It may be QI--Lmbuga 18:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC) New version with cropped the sky Poco a poco 22:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC) - Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Pilatus_P3-03_P3-Flyers_HB-RBN_OTT_2013_01.jpg edit
- Nomination Pilatus P3-03 of the P3-Flyers. --Julian Herzog 19:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose blown sky for me --A.Savin 14:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
It's not clipped and not white in the file. Should I darken it further? --Julian Herzog 19:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Since it would be fixable if I fully understood the reason for decline, I'd like to get a more detailed reason. --Julian Herzog 10:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC) - This kind of sky is the enemy of the photograph, here I think that it is acceptable, I'm just curious about the bottom left, what is it? smoke? --Christian Ferrer 17:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- That's smoke from the previous aerobatic display, yes. --Julian Herzog 22:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Not the best in the series of airplane photos, but acceptable. --Smial 21:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support As far as I can judge from the RGB values, the sky is not burnt (no X,X,X values). --Tuxyso 10:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Lancaster Memorial, kapel bij Lancaster Memorial foto1 2011-06-03 15.23.JPG edit
- Nomination near Weiswampach, chapel Lancaster Memorial (Luxemburg) --Michielverbeek 22:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Dark, low colour depth. --Mattbuck 23:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support A bit dark, but acceptable to me.--Jebulon 16:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Jebulon 16:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Binsfeld, kerk foto3 2011-06-03 13.53.JPG edit
- Nomination Binsfeld, church (Luxemburg) --Michielverbeek 22:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Cayambe 23:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp, especially on left. --Mattbuck 23:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Thin white sharpening line all along the clock tower, and per Mattbuck. --Jebulon 16:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Cayambe 16:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Géromont, kerk foto1 2011-06-04 10.59.JPG edit
- Nomination Géromont, church (Belgium) --Michielverbeek 22:41, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad dithering in noted area, also dark. --Mattbuck 23:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Darkness is acceptable to me, but not the overall sharpness low quality.--Jebulon 16:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Please use somewhat less noise reduction and sharpening settings. -- Smial 21:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Bystrzyca_Kłodzka,_Brama_Wodna,_01.JPG edit
- Nomination Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka --Jacek Halicki 22:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC) OpposePoor composition, noisy. --Mattbuck 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mattbuck.--Jebulon 13:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Good compositon (too tight at top) but strong noise (sky) and not good detail. The car is disturbing, also. --Lmbuga 03:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:St_Stephen's_Church,_Up_Nately_north_west.jpg edit
- Nomination St Stephen's Church, Up Nately, viewed from the North-west. --Lewis Hulbert 14:50, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Not sharp. --Mattbuck 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
This looks sharp to me. Discuss --Lewis Hulbert 23:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC) Oppose I'm with mattbuck on this one. Pleclown 12:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination It's sharper than 90% of my other QIs, but whatever. Lewis Hulbert 16:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Michael Haneke Wien 2014.jpg edit
- Nomination Film director Michael Haneke. --Tsui 21:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Good IMO, but the bottom of the picture is too dark -Lmbuga 02:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
to me its a QI. --Ralf Roletschek 15:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Yes, but it's improvable: Let's discuss--Lmbuga 14:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC) CommentTo be honest, I don't see how the darkness of his clothes should or could be improved. They were black. --Tsui 00:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment I uploaded a new version. The image was underexposed with Lightroom. If you want, you can revert it. Previously, the image could be QI, but now it is QI IMO. I understand that now I should not vote--Lmbuga 13:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI. --P e z i 14:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support I thought it was all right to begin with, but it's better now. --Lewis Hulbert 17:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI. --Isiwal 22:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Lmbuga 22:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Kirche Sophiental 4.jpg edit
- Nomination Church in Sophiental --Hydro 18:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC) OpposePlease correct tilt/perspective. Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline SupportGood quality without distortion --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Oppose I'd think that it's not QI without the correction. --Lewis Hulbert 17:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure who added the oppose template to my above message, but I'm willing to support upon fixing. --Lewis Hulbert 16:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above.--Jebulon 13:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013_Longines_Global_Champions_-_Lausanne_-_14-09-2013_-_Ratisseuse.jpg edit
- Nomination: 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Ratisseuse --Pleclown 12:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Review
{{o}} Composition: too tight at right (it seems a randon picture).It needs better description IMO: What happens in the image? Subject?--Lmbuga 13:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
May I have another opinion ? The description is right, the woman with the rake (ratisseuse in french) is the main subject. --Pleclown 20:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Is insulting to ask "May I have another opinion?". I think so.The description of the photo does not talk about any girl, the proposal also. What you say about the crop?--Lmbuga 22:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, the description must be in English, I don't understood "Ratisseuse". I thought that it was a place. --Lmbuga 22:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The description of the file say "English" and in English the description don't speak about a girl--Lmbuga 23:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Question What you think about the crop at right (random file?)?--Lmbuga 23:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
firstly, I'm sorry if you feel insulted, I just used the same language than other users. Regarding the description, it does not say english, and there is no obligation to have a description in english, as far as I'm aware. Regarding the crop, this is usually not a reason to decline right away, as the nominator can modify the picture. As I have done. Pleclown 20:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC) 
neutral tending to weak opposition Better now. Sorry images should have a meaningful title and description is a rule that must be interpreted. When a image is QI, the image must be categorized in Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted. With your description the image would probably be categorized in "sports". With a clearer description would be categorized in "people". I beg you to specify the language in which is written the description and make a description in at least another language.--Lmbuga 18:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- You always have the right not to think alike. Or the right to ask for more reviews. I've never tried to attack your rights--Lmbuga 18:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes? --Lmbuga 23:17, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Weidenkaetzchen_01.JPG edit
- Nomination Catkins of Salix caprea in close-up view --Uoaei1 17:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline I fear that the area in focus is too small --Poco a poco 19:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
I want to discuss this and ask for more opinions. Please keep in mind that the DOF for such macros is just a few mm --Uoaei1 18:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC) - Oppose You have two solutions. Either you put a flash and you farm F29, or you do a stack of focus. --Archaeodontosaurus 09:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor DoF IMO--Lmbuga 03:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Beeston MMB 09 Humber Road South 222019.jpg edit
- Nomination 22019 speeds through Beeston. Mattbuck 09:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline The train is blurry. See note also. --Jbribeiro1 00:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
That would be because it's travelling very fast, and I can't see your haloes without zooming well beyond 100%. --Mattbuck 21:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC) - Support QI. --P e z i 15:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, insufficient control of the movement--Lmbuga 18:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lmbuga. --Arctic Kangaroo 08:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Zona_arqueológica_de_Cantona,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_33.JPG edit
- Nomination Archaeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion The cloud in the middle seems to be overexposed. See note, please. --Jbribeiro1 00:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
I don't really think it's that badly overexposed (if that much at all) --Lewis Hulbert 12:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new version to definitively solve this issue, but please Jribeiro1, don't decline pictures for such an easy-to-fix topic Poco a poco 20:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
OK for me now. And sorry, as I said I'm new here (specially voting). Jbribeiro1 21:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC) Support QI for me --Halavar 10:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Support QI to me --DKrieger 21:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC) - Support --Lewis Hulbert 23:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Cornus_mas_Knospe_01.JPG edit
- Nomination Bud of Cornus mas --Uoaei1 15:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not properly sharp IMO. --Mattbuck 00:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I want to discuss this and ask for more opinions. Please keep in mind that the DOF for such macros is just a few mm --Uoaei1 18:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC).
I do understand that DOF is small but I can see there is scope of sharpness improvement in Post Processing using UnSharp technique. Please try to retouch, result will be better than as posted.Yndesai 06:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, as Mattbuck: unsharp and small DoF--Lmbuga 23:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Albarracín,_Teruel,_España,_2014-01-10,_DD_001.JPG edit
- Nomination Mirrors Gallery, Roman Aqueduct, Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 21:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Seems a bit blurry at the corners. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I guess, I need a third opinion. I have cropped it a bit, though, but the original file was IMHO also good to go --Poco a poco 10:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC) - Support --Ralf Roletschek 15:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Lmbuga 18:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Lmbuga 22:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Drewniana_architektura_w_Irkucku_33.JPG edit
- Nomination The wooden house. Irkutsk, Russia. --Halavar 20:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Bad description. It needs more specific category (windows). It has the same description as the previous photo-Lmbuga 03:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Info More precise description added. --Halavar 09:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment New version uploaded. Less chromatic noise and a bit less of CAs. If you don't like it (@Halavar, @Jacek Halicki) revert you it, please--Lmbuga 17:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the improved version. Halavar 11:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Support OK now. --JLPC 18:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Info Categorized in Category:Windows in Russia--Lmbuga 20:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Weak oppose After seeing the image often is not IQ in my opinion. I do not like the composition. White areas may be blown out in my opinion. Sorry, I don't like the detail --Lmbuga 03:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Lmbuga 23:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013-08-30 HICOG-Siedlung Tannenbusch, Hochhaus Im Tannenbusch 3, Bonn, Blickrichtung Südsüdost IMG 0698.jpg edit
- Nomination HICOG-Siedlung Tannenbusch: highrise building (by Hasenläufer)--Leit 12:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support OK. --Mattbuck 18:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Comment According to the guidelines, don't the verticals have to be vertical to qualify as a QI? --DAJF 15:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Now better?--Leit 19:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Certainly an improvement, but to qualify as a QI, the image still needs to be adjusted so that the building on the left is vertical. I've added a note to the image. --DAJF 01:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support for this version. If you set the left side vertical, the whole image will get an extremely unnatural look. --Dirtsc (talk) 11:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: I was informed by a regular here that the rules on perspective for architectural subjects were not negotiable, and the same was repeated on the Talk page recently. If deviations are to be allowed, then the rules ought to be changed. I'm happy to change my vote if the image can be corrected. --DAJF 15:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortion.--Jebulon 14:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose too strong distorted. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose perspective distortion. --Cayambe (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Cayambe 16:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)