Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 01 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Dome_of_Bernini's_Parish_Church_in_Castel_Gandolfo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Dome of Bernini's Parish Church in Castel Gandolfo --Livioandronico2013 20:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Very good -- Spurzem 20:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)  Oppose Composition: too tight crop at right left, (sorry).--Jebulon 16:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
      Support Good 4 me. --Palauenc05 20:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    Better Jebulon? thanks--Livioandronico2013 21:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Yes !--Jebulon 21:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 15:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 21:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Maria im Weingarten 01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Church Maria im Weingarten, Volkach in Bavaria --Derzno 15:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Very inclined lines and too tight crop below. -- Spurzem 15:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose bad combo and inclined --Denkmalhelfer 19:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
      Comment The inclined are a part of personal art of this picture and teh crop to cut off disturbing parts in teh front --Derzno 19:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Das mag ja alles sein, und die Geschmäcker sind verschieden. Aber ich kann in den schiefen und verzogenen Linien nichts Künstlerisches erkennen und dass unten Störenendes weggeschnitten wurde, ändert nichts daran, dass die Kirche zu dicht auf dem Bildrand steht. Schade, und bitte nichts für ungut. Vielleicht gibt es aber auch noch andere Meinungen, die mir widersprechen. Gruß -- Spurzem 07:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Crop is tight but just ok. But it needs perspective corrections and there is too much noise in the sky. --MB-one 12:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
      Done new version uploaded --Derzno 12:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose looks much more worst as before. --Denkmalhelfer 15:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment It's leaning outwards now (too much tilt correction) nad there's still some noise (less than before). --MB-one 21:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 13:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Church_of_San_Tolomeo_(Nepi).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Church of San Tolomeo (Nepi) --Livioandronico2013 07:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment Overexposed and CA on top, nice composition --Moroder 18:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not done --Moroder 17:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    I was blocked Moroder,better? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks better now --Moroder 05:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 11:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 11:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination Painel Tiradentes, Candido Portinari. One of best works. --Webysther 14:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose 18,431 × 3,351 pixels, but sorry, blurried, noise, poor detail, CAs. With this resolution other users may think differently: Discuss--Lmbuga 18:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Info In place of exposition is not possible use tripod, flash and have low light. O do no how fix this issues. To create this image i used another 20 joined. -- Webysther 11:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support For me the resolution is good enogh to resolv the problems. In 3k pixel is impossible to see any problem. -- Webysther (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)The nominator is not allowed to vote --Christian Ferrer 07:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too unsharp. Alvesgaspar 22:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Alve --Livioandronico2013 20:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)