Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 06 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Mauritius_Intercontinental-Mauritius_Resort-Balaclava-Fort-01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination mauritius: Lobby of InterContinental Mauritius Resort Balaclava Fort --Cccefalon 00:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 01:09, 2 May 2015
  •   Oppose sorry disagree, partly too dark --Denkmalhelfer 12:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)(UTC)
    – Incredible! -- Spurzem 11:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Kadellar 00:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 11:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Good enough Alvesgaspar 13:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 08:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Little_grebe_(Tachybaptus_ruficollis).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Little grebe (Tachybaptus ruficollis), WWT London Wetland Centre, Barnes --Charlesjsharp 10:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Not QI for me, but "discuss" (others can opine different and it's a good picture): notable overexposed area (at the start of the peak next to the eye) is disturbing. --Lmbuga 16:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Have reduced over-exposure. --Charlesjsharp 08:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support looks fine for me --Denkmalhelfer 12:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support ok for me. --Kadellar 01:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 14:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Aqueduct of Aspendos 03.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Roman aqueduct of Aspendos, Turkey --Bgag 15:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose inclined, blown out sky sorry no QI --Denkmalhelfer 15:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. There is nothing blown out. --Hubertl 16:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nothing blown out. Please learn, how to read a histogram, before you insert wrong allegations. Also, for photos of architectural entities, which are taken from an extreme near view, a total perspective correction is not asked in QIC. --Cccefalon 00:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support. Sehr gutes Bild. Die stürzenden Linien wirken gut. Und wenn ich unmittelbar vor einem Bauwerk steil hochschaue, habe ich einen ähnlichen Eindruck. Für die Kritik habe ich kein Verständnis. -- Spurzem 08:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support sehr schöne stürzende Linien --Ralf Roletschek 18:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 08:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Webysther_20150428110918_-_Edifícios_Terraço_Itália_e_Copan.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Edifícios Terraço Itália e Copan respectivamente. --Webysther 13:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose partly to light, no details and sky not in golden cut by 1/3, sorry --Denkmalhelfer 15:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Golden cut isn't necessary. Just crop the sky. I would choose 16:9. Then I'll give a pro. --Hockei 16:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done --Webysther 01:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality with the different ratio. --Cccefalon 02:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Hockei 05:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Buildings on the right side are leaning. Contrast too low.vAlvesgaspar 15:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Paraneetroplus synspilus 2015 G2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Quetzel cichlid -- George Chernilevsky 20:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 07:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Head seems over-exposed to me. --Charlesjsharp 17:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok for me. --Kadellar 01:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for me Alvesgaspar 15:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Kadellar 01:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Μαρίνα Ζέας 8021.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Zea harbour or Pasalimani, Piraeus, Greece. --C messier 16:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Not very crisp --Moroder 21:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment IMHO, crisp enough, please discuss. --C messier 07:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me. --Kadellar 01:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Image grainy and undetailed. The camera is to blame, I suppose. Alvesgaspar 15:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 14:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Lophophorus_impejanus_LC0387.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Himalayan monal (Lophophorus impejanus), Zoo Leipzig, Germany --LC-de 21:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment please The minimum resolution for submissions is 4 megapixels?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please don't apply this as a rule as long as it is not agreed. --LC-de 07:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)*OK! Thank you.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Moroder 07:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The stone is very disturbing --Livioandronico2013 20:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC))
  •   Oppose Per above. Alvesgaspar 15:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Silver-spotted_skipper_butterfly_(Hesperia_comma)_female.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) female --Charlesjsharp 07:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Would work with a more uniformly focused background --Daniel Case 17:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC))
  •   Comment Would welcome 2nd opinion on the background of this macro image of a butterfly that usually rests near the ground, not on a pretty flower. --Charlesjsharp 07:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support the right part of the background is focused because the soil is not uniform and this area is on the same level that of the butterfly which is ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for me. --Hockei 13:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 21:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)