Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 06 2021
-
- Nomination View of the De Grote Kerk from Hindeloopen.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of the De Grote Kerk from Hindeloopen.
-
- Nomination Decorative separation fence in Hindeloopen.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Decorative separation fence in Hindeloopen.
-
- Nomination Sunrise in Mühlenbrok in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front of a church bench at the Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Treetop in “Der Linnert” near Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paper aircraft --XRay 03:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angel relief in the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph, Canada --Maksimsokolov 02:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Covered staircase to the cemetery, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Covered staircase to the cemetery, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charnel house at the cemetery of Maria Wörth, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic pointed arch portal of the charnel house at the cemetery in Maria Wörth, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief of Saint Primus at the alms box right hand of the south portal at the parish and pilgrimage church Saints Primus and Felician, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination American Black Duck pair in Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn. --Rhododendrites 17:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Very well done --Wilfredor 17:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination American wigeon, Prospect Park in January 2018 --Rhododendrites 17:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Nice bird --Wilfredor 17:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canada goose gosling in Green-Wood Cemetery --Rhododendrites 17:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Very lovely, maybe a bit satured --Wilfredor 17:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former rail bridge of Dahlhausen with pedestrain bridge in front --Tuxyso 16:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter in the Long Rhön with distant view to the Thuringian Forest --Milseburg 11:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 14:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief (1727) of Saint Peter at historical building Krahnenstraße 30 in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 11:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Piazza Navona in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Obelisco Agonale at Piazza Navona in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Obelisco Agonale at Piazza Navona in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo del Governatorato in the Vatican City. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former clergy and convent house of the Dreifaltigkeitskirche in Speyer
--F. Riedelio 07:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Former clergy and convent house of the Dreifaltigkeitskirche in Speyer
-
- Nomination View of the village Bonfeld, Germany, from the Mühlberg. --Aristeas 07:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Wu-ji Jen-yuan Altar, Tamsui Wu-ji Tian-yuan Temple
--Heeheemalu 06:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC) - Decline Flickr photos are per se ineligible for consideration for Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Wu-ji Jen-yuan Altar, Tamsui Wu-ji Tian-yuan Temple
-
- Nomination Flower of a pearl hyacinth in a garden in Bamberg, Bayerm. Focus stack of 13 images. --Ermell 06:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion I'm impressed. -- Ikan Kekek 07:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Support Good quality and beautiful – allows to study that tiny flower in all detail. --Aristeas 07:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Residential house in Kirchschönbach --Ermell 06:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good qusality --Michielverbeek 08:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kriegerdenkmal in Weismain --Ermell 06:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skyscrapers in New Taipei
--Heeheemalu 06:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC) - Decline Per se ineligible and not good with those skyscrapers leaning, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek 07:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Skyscrapers in New Taipei
-
- Nomination Taipei 101 viewed from Mount Fujhou
--Heeheemalu 06:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC) - Decline Not your photo; from Flickr and per se ineligible. -- Ikan Kekek 07:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Taipei 101 viewed from Mount Fujhou
-
- Nomination Town hall of La Croix-sur-Gartempe, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 05:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 05:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Verneuil-Moustiers, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 05:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Regina caeli" with the Christogram "IHS", Chapel on the Michaelsberg, Untergrombach, Germany --Llez 05:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:32, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination The winged Victory in Brescia. --Moroder 03:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The winged Victory statue in the Capitolium in Brescia. --Moroder 03:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church of Saint John the Theologian in Fira, Santorini. --C messier 20:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination View of the holy trinity church with whole tower in sight. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality for me. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of the building to the entrance to Bioparco in Rome, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality for me. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: monument in Ukraine, number: 46-253-0040 --Ezarate 22:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Much sharpness of the original file has been lost. Can you check if it can be retained? Thank you. --Lion-hearted85 01:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
see now, please --Ezarate 11:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bergmann bei der Arbeit --Horst J. Meuter 16:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Strong
chromatic aberration and 
Overexposed --Wilfredor 19:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 7 Rue Port Royal in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 15:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Looks like there is some lens distortion? -- Discostu 10:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
New version uploaded, Tournasol7 16:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Discostu? Tournasol7 07:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Support Good quality. ok now --Ezarate 22:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
-
_02.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_mit_Schnee_(2).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
-edited.jpg)
.jpg)
Consensual review edit
File:_Drake_Селезень.jpg_ edit
- Nomination Winter-drake --AlixSaz 06:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Billy69150 16:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the head looks hazy + the shadow is too distracting. --Nefronus 16:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)- Support Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support I don't mind the shadow --Moroder 08:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Incorrect description (english double). --F. Riedelio 06:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)- Support QI IMO--Lmbuga 15:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Gänseblümchen_IMG_9277.jpg edit
- Nomination Gänseblümchenwiese und Weinbergs-Hyazienten an der Deutschen Weinstraße in Rheínland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 16:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:38, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I think the details are not very clear + the image looks 'confused' due to the contrast caused by the direct sunlight. --Nefronus 16:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Support. The lighting is somewhat harsh, and the overall sharpness is not perfect, probably due to diffraction. But if you want high DOF with moving objects, you need to step down the aperture. I think the photo is good enough. --Smial 10:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- weak Support - quality seems sufficient for QI to me, and is consistent across the frame Rhododendrites 23:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted Rhododendrites 23:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Promoted Rhododendrites 23:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)File:Marcq_villa_vitrail_24_rue_ducrocq.jpg edit
- Nomination Art Deco house, Rue Jean-Baptiste Ducrocq 24, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 06:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Car is distracting --Wilfredor 19:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your review. Well, it goes with the house (no way to fit it into the 1930s garage) --Velvet 15:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. Sorry but, for me, we can not require to don't have any cars in a street. Furthermore, the car is not cropped. --Sebring12Hrs 08:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support The car would be a problem for FP, but requiring the absence of cars in street scenes on QIC is going way too far. This is a quality photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan --Moroder 08:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. A bit too harsh lighting due to the unshaded sunlight, otherwise good. --Smial 10:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan --LexKurochkin 09:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Black_house_Amsterdam_Embankment,_2_in_Yoshkar-Ola.jpg edit
- Nomination Black house Amsterdam Embankment, 2 in Yoshkar-Ola, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 10:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Need a better image description, also could be good a geolocation --Wilfredor 21:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: Done--Reda Kerbouche 05:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor:
- Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 14:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I disagree. IMO this one is not sharp enough... --Tournasol7 06:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Weak oppose The brightness of the photo is not great --Billy69150 16:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)- Weak oppose Not great sharpness + hazy at the top. Nefronus 08:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Perspective correction required. --F. Riedelio 06:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Young_Larus_michahellis_in_Locarno_2.jpg edit
- Nomination Larus michahellis --Commonists 09:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the background is full of noise accented by oversharpening. --Nefronus 19:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support I don't see that as a problem, on the contrary --Moroder 18:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposed. Charlesjsharp 08:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose As Nefronus. Jpeg artifacts. Halo on the right side of the neck. Noisy--Lmbuga 15:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality does neither the camera nor the bird justice, I'm afraid. --A.Savin 18:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Young_Larus_michahellis_in_Locarno.jpg edit
- Nomination Larus michahellis --Commonists 10:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good focus and high quality. Good quality. --Berrely 16:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I dissagree, there is some strong CA and sharpening artifacts. Plus there are already better photos of this bird (by you) promoted. --Nefronus 19:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Nefronus, it's totally irrelevant at QIC whether they took better photos of this species. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This probably fails the value criteria for QI Ikan Kekek. The user is nominating too many poorly-composed images of the same species and some, like this one are inferior and, for me, add no value. Charlesjsharp 08:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If you think the composition is so poor that we should decline the photo, you don't have to make a decision about the nebulous concept of value, which is not clearly defined for QIC. Surely, any visible photo of a bird in water could have some value. However, the idea that because someone has already nominated a better photo of a bird, a mountain view, a building, etc., that by itself is a good basis for declining another nomination seems poorly founded. QIC is about quality, not about which photos in a given category are best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek 19:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Supportsharp enough and good quality. Good enough for me! -- Geoprofi Lars 14:04, 01 Mai 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The sharpening artifacts are particularly noticeable due to the exaggerated noise reduction. It results in a very unbalanced image impression when heavily sharpened parts of the image stand directly next to areas that are completely without structure, but where you intuitively know that structures should be visible. Parts of the feathers therefore look like frayed plastic parts. Also some CA. --Smial 10:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose As Nefronus and Smial --Lmbuga 15:34, 3 May 2021 (UTC)