Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 17 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Sarzeau.- La chapelle Notre Dame de la Côte, Penvins.jpg edit

 

  • Withdrawn
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:13-04-05-Skoda_Museum_Mladá_Boleslav_by_RalfR-002.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Škoda Fabia S2000 of Škoda Motorsport --Ralf Roletschek 17:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline   Support Good quality. --XRay 18:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't agree : the picture is very noisy and really oversharpened ! Gzzz 21:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose sorry, much noise (already visible in 800px-preview) -- Der Wolf im Wald 08:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose nosiy and partly too dark. --Denkmalhelfer 09:09, 9 May 2015 (UTC) I stroke the vote of a banned sockpuppet out. --Cccefalon 17:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment IMO the background looks noisy but the image isn't very noisy. The spots in the background seem to be natural. What do you think?--XRay 11:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Perhaps a bit noisy but, lighting could be better, but good colors, good sharpness and good composition. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support My comment has to be understood as a neutralizing the negative vote here --Derzno 14:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC) I stroke the vote of a banned sockpuppet out. --Cccefalon 17:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment do yo be here to discuss picture or about me? For your first comments you should focus on true pictures --Denkmalhelfer 16:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment "Neutralizing" can't be a reason for "pro" ... --XRay 12:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Σπάρτακος 11:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overprocessed, massive sharpening artifacts everywhere. Also many dust spots. -- Smial 08:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry,per others --Livioandronico2013 07:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 18:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)