Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 21 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Water in the Rimondi Fountain Rethymno Crete Greece.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Detail of the Rimondi Fountain, Rethymno, Crete, Greece.--Jebulon 16:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --DXR 16:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Need perspective correction,nothing straight --Livioandronico2013 21:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
    • typical revenge vote, never mind.--Jebulon 08:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    • It is not revenge, do not I have opposed all your photo only to those who do not consider QI, given that demand pinpoint accuracy then we do it your way. The rules apply to all or only some? If you want to be precise you have to be yourself!   Let's see if others will give me wrong then I am wrong, or not, this serves a community --LivioAndronico talk 10:27, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Imho this is a kind of image where correcting the lines wouldn't make sense. This is not architecture where we have one main surface such as a wall, but several (the ground and the wall). The camera was obviously pointed from upside down at an angle. --DXR 14:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
a fountain is not architecture? Since when?--Livioandronico2013 14:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I don´t want to get involved in your personal dispute, but IMO it´s QI. Just take it as a neutral vote. --Hubertl 18:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Per DXR and Hubertl. --DKrieger 22:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Perspective correction is difficult if there are no vertical lines. Fountain is OK and doesn't need correction. IMO it's QI. --XRay 17:35, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 11:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)