Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 21 2021

• 
  • Nomination View from the Badpaviljoen at Hindeloopen across the IJsselmeer.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the bridge over the Greft Hindeloopen.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moat in the game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buds of a Japanese maple in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Disinfectant provided for visitors to the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lothringer Kreuz, cenotaph 3rd Lothringisches Feldartillerie-Regiment No. 69, on the main avenue of the palace gardens in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graves of the Lördemann family at central cemetery in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beeches at the Wörthersee-Süduferstraße in Reifnitz, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roof of the covered staircase to the cemetery, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painting of Saint Christopher at the parish and pilgrimage church Saints Primus and Felician, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overdoor at the rectory on Pfarrplatz #1, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overdoor at the rectory on Pfarrplatz #1, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculptures in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. --Lmbuga 21:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exterior of the Ermita de San Telmo (Puerto de la Cruz), Canary Islands, Spain --Lmbuga 21:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 21:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Isidoro Carreter. Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain --Lmbuga 21:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit of the Bilsteins in the Vogeslsberg --Milseburg 21:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common dandelion flowers -- George Chernilevsky 21:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common dandelion field -- George Chernilevsky 21:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lily magnolia, also known as Mulan magnolia -- George Chernilevsky 21:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diesel locomotive ChME3T-7368 -- George Chernilevsky 21:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-veined darter (Sympetrum fonscolombii) male --Charlesjsharp 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Variegated green skimmer (Orthetrum sabina) female --Charlesjsharp 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue emperor (Anax imperator) female laying eggs --Charlesjsharp 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Willow emerald damselfly (Chalcolestes viridis) female --Charlesjsharp 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion > Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruddy darter (Sympetrum sanguineum) male --Charlesjsharp 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion > Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Condemned building, Rue de Maubeuge, in Lille, France --Velvet 16:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autumn view from the Pferdskopf in the Rhön Mountains to the north --Milseburg 14:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 15:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sandy beach of Ayia Thekla, Sotira, Cyprus. --Tupungato 14:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque in memory of dead soldiers from Vézelay during WWI, interior of Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay in France. --Chabe01 14:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 15:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 60 --Berthold Werner 12:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 15:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colonne onorarie in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 11:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colonne onorarie in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 11:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 11:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 11:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slopes of Kush Kaya (Sokol) coral mount in Novy Svet, Crimea. --Argenberg 10:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volognano Castle seen from the vineyard. --PROPOLI87 08:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Below 2 MP. Also artifact dark stripe in the sky on the left. --George Chernilevsky 08:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC): Commentok, for the size, however I proceeded to cut on the left. Thank youPROPOLI87 10:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 10:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Les Hauts Forts from La Bourgeoise in Samoëns, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gentiana lutea in St-Jean-d'Aulps, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhododendron ferrugineum at col de Tavaneuse in Saint-Jean-d'Aulps, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti in the industrial area of Bolzano --Ermell 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Excavator lake near Dörfleins --Ermell 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City fountain in Weismain in Upper Franconia --Ermell 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Obendorfer Brewery in Weismain --Ermell 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Weismain --Ermell 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Left side it seems leaning in. --Tournasol7 07:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     DoneThanks for the review.--Ermell 09:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Thank for you! --Tournasol7 10:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Nouveau houses, Rue Frédéric Mottez 15 & 17, Lille, France --Velvet 06:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower bud of an Allium (ornamental onion) after a rain shower. Focus stack of 16 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frescos by Gabriele Rottini in the Palazzo Tosio. --Moroder 05:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frescos in the Palazzo Tosio in Brescia. --Moroder 05:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marble statue of nude boy pressing grapes. --Moroder 05:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel with marble statue of Christ. --Moroder 05:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Etching of Napoleon in Egypt by Francesco Rosaspina. --Moroder 05:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mahlberg Tower, Malsch, District of Karlsruhe, Germany --Llez 05:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Harp Dove Snail, Microcithara harpiformis --Llez 05:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination VGP Layout map info board with setting, Uthandi, Chennai --Tagooty 04:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please check your image. IMO it's titled CW. --XRay 05:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
    @XRay:  Done Please see the new version. --Tagooty 08:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support IMO good enough. Thank you. --XRay 10:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination VGP Layout map info board, close up, Uthandi, Chennai --Tagooty 04:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Governors Island from the southwest (panorama) --Rhododendrites 03:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-winged blackbird on a fence on Governors Island --Rhododendrites 03:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree swallow sticking its head out of a nest box in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge --Rhododendrites 03:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree swallow sticking its head out of a nest box in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge --Rhododendrites 03:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-throated green warbler in Prospect Park --Rhododendrites 03:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Piazza Cavour 25 in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 22:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colonne onorarie in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 22:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Si Lom Station, a metro station in Bangkok --Chainwit. 21:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Redeemer Church, Bangkok --Chainwit. 21:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Nice building and good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bangkok’s Holy Redeemer Church --Chainwit. 21:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Nice building and good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife, Canary Islands. Spain. --Lmbuga 21:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife, Canary Islands. Spain. --Lmbuga 21:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quay of El Penitente. Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. --Lmbuga 21:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quay of El Penitente. Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. --Lmbuga 21:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quay of El Penitente. Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. --Lmbuga 21:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruine of the House 12 of Krasnaia street --Reda Kerbouche 19:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. What's the point in such nominations? You read COM:Image guidelines first? --A.Savin 08:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC) @A.Savin: I did not understand this way of speaking? I am not asking you for your advice. if you don't like it, just put your argument without extra words or ignore this image please. --Reda Kerbouche 09:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment This is disrespectful, Reda Kerbouche -- I decline it not because "i don't like it", but because of its low quality. --A.Savin 09:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC) @A.Savin: It's disrespectful of you, why do you use those kinds of words? What's the point in such nominations? I am free to put the photo that I want, as you are free to refuse it. But how important are the additional words you use? I invite you to read this Commons:Assume good faith before you put comments. --Reda Kerbouche 09:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krasina Street house 10 in Vyborg, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 19:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 08:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corner House on Krepostnaya Street, 8 in Vyborg --Reda Kerbouche 19:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 08:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paper Kite in the butterfly house alaris on Rügen --F. Riedelio 15:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose blurred --Charlesjsharp 14:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --F. Riedelio 15:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speckled wood in the butterfly house alaris on Rügen --F. Riedelio 15:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose overprocessed, blurry. Incorrect id, this is not a speckled wood. --Charlesjsharp 14:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp:
     Question Thank you very much for the review. Even though the picture is not very good, I would like to categorize it correctly. So can you please tell me the correct species? --F. Riedelio 16:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lac des Plagnes in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Female brown-headed cowbird singing at Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge --Rhododendrites 03:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cape May warbler in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge --Rhododendrites 03:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canada goose goslings in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge --Rhododendrites 03:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Least sandpiper in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge --Rhododendrites 03:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main altar in the Madonna del Lino church in Brescia. --Moroder 21:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good quality. The mural and wall above "Mater Christi" is noisy. Selective NR may help. --Tagooty 02:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 18:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ of the Protestant branch church in Alladorf --Ermell 07:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Deco building, Rue du Molinel 17 & 19, Lille, France --Velvet 06:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument to victims of Vyborg massacre near Fredrikshamn Gate of Annenkrone --Reda Kerbouche 05:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Tilted clockwise. --Tagooty 15:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC) @Tagooty:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 17:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crocodile at Cologne Zoo --Ermell 06:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 14:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the St Medard church in St-Méard, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 06:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 15:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nativity of Jesus Christ church in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 18:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 18:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial plaque on the house where the actor Vasily Vasilyevich Samoilov lived and died. Stremyannaya Street, 8. St. Petersburg --Erzianj jurnalist 11:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  Request Please correct the vertical line on the right side --Moroder 16:26, 15 May 2021 (UTC) @Moroder:  Done --Erzianj jurnalist 20:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palazzo Braschi in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMO the shadow in the foreground should be cropped. --F. Riedelio 09:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    IMO it's not good idea. This shadow doesn't disturb that much, but after crop the frame it will be too tight. --Tournasol7 10:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Chandra_Tributary_Rohtang_View_Lahaul_Himachal_Oct20_D72_18654.jpg

• Nomination Desolate late autumn view of tributary on right bank of Chandra (elev. 3,250m (10,663')), Lahaul, Himachal --Tagooty 11:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
   Oppose Several dust spots (most visible with 2,560 × 1,440 pixels)--Lmbuga 02:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)}
  @Lmbuga: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version with several dust spots removed. --Tagooty 03:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice view --Moroder 07:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality! --Navneetsharmaiit 08:04, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice, but none of it is really that sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 19:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Mallah_Uhl_Himachal_Oct20_D72_18770.jpg

• Nomination Mallah village, Uhl River valley left bank, Kangra, Himachal. --Tagooty 11:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
   Oppose Overexposed. I don´t think that is fixable. --Ermell 20:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  This was taken in bright noon-time sun hence the overall brightness is natural. A few small patches of zinc roofing appear white. However, close to 100% of the scene is properly exposed. --Tagooty 02:43, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed and way too much blurring. Noon light should look bright, but the exposure should be set accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree Seven Pandas 00:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Tagooty 04:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Seven Pandas 00:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Hausdülmen,_Blüten_eines_Apfelbaums_--_2021_--_7465.jpg

• Nomination Blossoms of an apple tree in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree, it’s very blurred. Perhaps a wrong photo was uploaded? --Nefronus 09:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support. Not really crisp sharpness, but regarding the resolution good enough to be printed to A4, or larger. Like the soft lighting that results in decent colours. --Smial 22:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMO not sharp enough for QI. --F. Riedelio 15:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMO not sharp enough for QI.--Lmbuga 21:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your reviews. --XRay 05:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   XRay 05:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Teatro_romano_de_Mérida._España-2.jpg

• Nomination Ancient Roman theatre in Mérida, Spain. --Lmbuga 12:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
  No color space in metadata (sRGB recommended). --F. Riedelio 06:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
   Comment IT'S SRGB--Lmbuga 03:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, assuming the color space is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

 Comment Color space is not included in "Metadata" (Tag ID 0xa001 in the group ExifIFD). --F. Riedelio 06:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Don't see any problem with the color space --Moroder 07:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support It's sRGB IEC61966-2.1, and the overall quality is fine. Very nice lighting. --Smial 23:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Helleborus_foetidus_007.jpg

• Nomination A Stinking Hellebore, Weingarten, Baden, Germany --Llez 05:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Focus and noise may be still acceptable for the high resolution. But considerable parts look overexposed. Let's discuss. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Info I corrected the overexposed parts and reduced noise --Llez 05:29, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Sorry, but it looks like not-very-well processed HDR and the subject itself is blurry. --Nefronus 09:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately, I must agree with Nefronus. Noise and lighting look better, but the image got more blurry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:TopCakeGuemes-MDP.jpg

• Nomination Coffee shop De Top Cake, Guemes and Avellaneda, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 20:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too noisy in my view. The picture should have been taken with a tripod, less ISO, longer exposure time. Sorry. --Imehling 07:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Imehling: see now Ezarate 22:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment Ok, let's have a discussion. --Imehling 20:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Imehling. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Imehling --Nefronus 09:42, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. As there are moving people, the result isn't too bad. Probably needs slight perspective correction? --Smial 00:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Tvrđa,_Osijek_04.jpg

• Nomination Tvrđa - fortress in Osijek, Croatia --Pudelek 14:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Sorry, but the church in the background is not sharp enough for me. --Steindy 16:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough IMO --Ermell 22:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough for me. Really marginal. Rodhullandemu 16:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Totally fine, IMO. It's reasonable for the church in the background to be just slightly less sharp than the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek 18:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan Kekek. --Nefronus 07:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Buchten,_de_Sint_Catharinakerk_IMG_8789_2021-04-25_11.14.jpg

• Nomination Buchten-NL, church: the Sint Catharinakerk --Michielverbeek 05:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment The tower leans slightly to the right. --Imehling 18:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment It did not appear to be easiest one to correct the verticals, but the left and right vertical are both straight (see note). --Michielverbeek 20:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
    •  Support Difficult question. I would have put the tower as the main object into a vertical position but this is probably a matter of taste.  Support --Imehling 10:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support The detail is somewhat blurry (especially the tip of the roof), but I think it’s good enough. --Nefronus 07:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Fried_chicken_with_vegetables_and_rice.jpg

• Nomination Fried chicken --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Too much noise, but very good with four megapixels--Lmbuga 20:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Too noisy IMO. More categories would help a lot. --Ermell 21:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

I added more categories, and IMHO the noise is ok taking into consideration such a large image --Wilfredor 22:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too much noise, focus a bit soft. Indicating location in Description or CAT will be useful. --Tagooty 15:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, DOF, composition, lighting. This meal does not look particularly appetising. --Smial 00:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:13, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Piazza_del_Risorgimento_46_in_Rome.jpg

• Nomination Piazza del Risorgimento 46 in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 19:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Oppose Sorry: Horizontal perspective distortion, disturbing objects in the foreground (traffic sign, car, people). --F. Riedelio 09:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment Sorry, I disagree. I don't see a perspective ditortion here; and this is a city, it's normal that we can see people and cars here. Discuss please. --Tournasol7 05:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't have problems with the traffic, the people and the horizontal distortion but IMO the covered traffic sign spoils unfortunately the whole composition. --Michielverbeek 20:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The covered sign makes the photo funny to me, not bad. It's a street scene, this is what it looked like, and it's well photographed. And the allergy to people and vehicles in photos of urban spaces is weird to me - cities have a lot of people and vehicles in them, so it should be expected for a street scene in a city to have people and vehicles in it. -- Ikan Kekek 19:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support by Ikan Kekek --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I think it is inevitable in many cases that people and cars are present on cityscapes. Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don’t mind the cars and people, but the traffic sign and perhaps the shadow on the right make the composition somewhat disturbing in my opinion. -- Nefronus (talk) 20:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support. Unfortunately, you are not allowed to cut down such annoying traffic signs, so covering them is clearly the better solution. Good enough. --Smial 00:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality imo --Trougnouf 22:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Speyer_Stuhlbrudergasse_1_001_2021_02_26.jpg

• Nomination Clergy house of the cathedral chapter in Speyer
  --F. Riedelio 07:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Oppose Sorry, IMO the cars are very disturbing. --XRay 07:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Neutral It's better, but the cars are still disturbing. Sometimes it isn't easy to take a good photograph without disturbing elements. An idea to use a ladder or another time. --XRay 11:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality for me, I want more votes. --Sebring12Hrs 10:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose per XRay. --Palauenc05 14:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Only the roof from cars in the front, that is indeed very disturbing --Michielverbeek 05:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Fine to me. Normal view of an urban building. This is 2021, not 1821, so there are parked cars on the street. There's plenty of remaining building to look at. -- Ikan Kekek 19:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

• Yes, but if cars, then the whole cars. But the cropped cars are not a good solution. If you can't hide elements, you have to integrate them. ;-) --XRay 08:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  

• I understand your point of view on this, but I don't think it would be better to crop to the left of the car than to the left of the building. However, I do like the new version that doesn't crop the cars on the bottom better. -- Ikan Kekek 20:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment New version, cropped. --F. Riedelio 11:51, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, IMO the cars are very disturbing.--Lmbuga 23:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The cars are too domineering in my view. There are situations when you just can't take a high quality picture.--Imehling 06:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support Oh the cars. I don’t mind them that much in this picture. --Nefronus 07:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The cars are disturbing. I think it's ok if they're there in a QI, but the focus point is set on them rather than the building which is the subject. (eg sharpness of the ground tiles fade away, and "golf" is clearly readable while the name on the door is not.) --Trougnouf 21:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with XRay about the cropped cars. Having the bottom car integrated in the frame is much better than having it cropped. Even if they are covering a bit of the building (and yes, not having them would be better in this case), I expect to have cars and other vehicles in an urban context in the same way I expect to have trees and vegetation on a mountain path. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 10:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)