Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 22 2018

Consensual review edit

File:2018-05-04_(213)_31_81_5380_206-7_at_Bahnhof_St._Valentin.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 31 81 5380 206-7 at Bahnhof St. Valentin. --GT1976 07:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment Good but there is a bit of tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 08:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Billy69150 09:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't understand this review, Billy69150. I've already reviewed this image and came to the conclusion that it needs a tilt to become QI. It still does because no update was uploaded. So, now you are forcing me to move this image to CR, which is a waste of ressources of the reviewers here. --Poco a poco 15:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted.--Peulle 16:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Basotxerri 19:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Morské_oko_(v_máji)_001.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Morské oko --Milan Bališin 19:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support null --Daniel Case 04:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose OK, your luck ran out here ... too muhc of the faded sky and very unsharp at the ridge --Daniel Case 04:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Please become one with yourself. --Milseburg 09:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Now this was meant to be a decline. Daniel Case 21:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 11:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Morské_oko_(v_máji)_003.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Morské oko --Milan Bališin 19:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose null --Daniel Case 04:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Better color here --Daniel Case 04:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Please become one with yourself. --Milseburg 09:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Oops! I accidentally clicked the same image twice. Appropriately amended. Daniel Case 21:58, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe 12:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 21:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Puerto_de_Ketchikan,_Alaska,_Estados_Unidos,_2017-08-16,_DD_49.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Port of Ketchikan, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 20:07, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose null --Ermell 22:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Sorry mistake using that tool.
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri 15:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 18:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe 12:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Amazing_wedding_photography.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Bride from BangladeshI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Jubair1985 --Masum-al-hasan 11:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support I don't know if you need an official permission of the bride for publication on Commons. However it is a nice photo, but the details might have been sharper. It would have been better if you would have used more light and choice a shorter exposure. --Michielverbeek 13:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted --Uoaei1 06:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support The tilted composition is intentional in this case. I would have liked a somewhat deeper DoF so the hands weren't blurry, but the face is sharp.--Peulle 22:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose the tilt might have artistic value, but not for QI. --MB-one 09:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per MB-one. Tournasol7 16:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - I can't believe this photo is likely to be declined because of intentional tilting. Obviously, everyone who looks at it knows the woman isn't actually standing at a slant. The photo is otherwise good enough for QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 17:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Wonderful ! --Billy69150 09:32, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per MB-one --Lmbuga 13:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support--Ralf Roletschek 20:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm also not finding this tilt very well done. It looks like a mistake more than an intention, and I don't see the purpose. Would support the corrected version, though -- Basile Morin 02:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)