Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 04 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Botanischer Garten Berlin-Dahlem 10-2014 photo21 Arundo donax.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Arundo donax in the Botanical Garden of Berlin --A.Savin 12:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Purple CAs --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't produce CA's. --A.Savin 08:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Photo is perfectly ok; no CAs. --Graphium 10:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No CAs? strong purple CAs --Christian Ferrer 11:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I see purple on the leafs on the right side, but not around the leafs : I don't think you can speak of CAs in this case. Any other opinions ? -- Gzzz 22:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  • If it's not CAs, it is Purple fringing and it is a defect, maybe fixable, if at least you try. --Christian Ferrer 00:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done and   Support new version with the agreement of the author. --Christian Ferrer 19:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 19:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Münster, Tor am Park Sentmaring -- 2014 -- 3225.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wrought iron gate to the Sentmaringer Park, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   OpposeToo dark in middle --Daniel Case 15:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with Daniel Case.--Jebulon 22:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Daniel Case -- Gzzz 22:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 00:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris - The Eiffel Tower in spring - 2307.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Eiffel Tower (by Jorgeroyan) --Paris 16 13:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion The trees in front of the tower aren't nice. A few areas seem burned. Jakec 17:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    quality is good for me and composition is nice --Taxiarchos228 20:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    There's also purple and blue/green CA on the trees and red CA on the tower. Jakec 12:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, nice picture. I think it meets the QI criteria. --Code (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Who likes this kind of perspective ... Anyway, the photo has good quality. --Steindy 11:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 11:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bystrzyca_Kłodzka,_Brama_Wodna_11.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 8 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Noisy and unsharp at the top. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support noise isn't disturbing here in the dark areas, good QI for me --~~~~
  •   Support. Good quality. I have no insight for the criticism above. -- Spurzem 10:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose--MB-one 14:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No problem with the noise but the human figure spoils the composition imo. Alvesgaspar 17:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose With Mattbuck about noise, and Alvesgaspar regarding the man. White oversharpening line along the handrail.--Jebulon 17:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 11:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)