Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 05 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Parkhotel_Luisenhöhe_Sonnenuntergang_2014.jpg edit

 

File:2014_Otmuchów,_ratusz_01.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Unsharp --Hubertl 09:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support I think that it is sharp enough. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support per Spurzem. Mattbuck 10:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support per Spurzem. --Lmbuga 22:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support, even the car's number are readable. --Brateevsky 14:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 18:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Otmuchów,_ratusz_04.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion unsharp --Hubertl 09:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support I think that it is sharp enough. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support per Spurzem. Mattbuck 10:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support per Spurzem. --Lmbuga 22:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 18:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Otmuchów,_ratusz_08.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion unsharp --Hubertl 09:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support I think that it is sharp enough. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support per Spurzem. Mattbuck 10:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support Very sharp IMO. --Lmbuga 22:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento,_Tallin,_Estonia,_2012-08-05,_DD_03.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Gargoyle at the Town Hall, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 17:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline {{o}} Sorry, not QI IMO: artifacts, perhaps too much noise reduction and too much sharpened--Lmbuga 20:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
      New version Poco a poco 20:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
      Comment Better, but the detail it's not good IMO, others can think--Lmbuga 21:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose main subject unsharp --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Christian Ferrer.--Jebulon 20:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Christian Ferrer 18:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)