Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 05 2019

• 
  • Nomination Iguazú Falls seen from Brazil --Bgag 03:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iguazú Falls seen from Brazil --Bgag 03:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iguazú Falls seen from Brazil --Bgag 03:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iguazú Falls seen from Brazil --Bgag 03:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clothing of indigenous peoples of North America in the Portland Art Museum, Oregon, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 01:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PH-BGT (aircraft). By User:Julian Herzog --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airbus A330 of Oman Air at Munich Airport. By User:Julian Herzog --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination UR-GAO (aircraft). By User:Julian Herzog --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tour of Austria, 2nd stage - Police car to the accompaniment. --Steindy 00:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tour of Austria, 2nd stage - Police helicopter to the accompaniment. --Steindy 00:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Billstedt, residential building Merkenstraße 19 --Dirtsc 22:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Hallstatt from the north, by User:Bwag --Isiwal 21:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 21:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arbeiterkammer Linz - fountain from Alois Dorn, by User:1971markus --Isiwal 21:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --IM3847 02:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Column of Saint Anna in Innsbruck, Tyrol, by User:Simon04 --Isiwal 21:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hayrack in Außervillgraten, Eastern Tyrol, by User:Haeferl --Isiwal 21:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 21:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Mülln, Salzburg, by User:Geolina163 --Isiwal 21:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination French project of personnal en:Participatory democracy at en:Saint-Étienne. --Touam 20:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In a contest of en:Yellow vests movement at en:Saint-Étienne, november 2 2019. --Touam 19:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not everyone is in focus. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greece, Mati, coast --Berthold Werner 15:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stoxastikos 16:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jackson County courthouse in Kansas City --Kbh3rd 15:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The sky is not good. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Passage de l'Hospice in Sévérac-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 15:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Fausta church of Bozouls, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 15:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Xanthodes transversa caterpillar in a lady's fingers plant leaf. Photographed near Kanjirappally. --Praveenp 14:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Nice image, but head is out of focus. --Tournasol7 15:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drinking fountain in Shirak Province, Armenia --Արման Բարսեղյան 13:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose null --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Khatchkar-memorial of Armenian genocide --Արման Բարսեղյան 13:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Underexposed --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lori Fortress. By User:Armineaghayan --Արման Բարսեղյան 13:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --IM3847 02:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterfalls near Ayatana resort, Coorg -- IM3847 12:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Nice image, but not sharp enough. Need the persective correction too. --Tournasol7 15:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cockpit of Mercedes-Benz SSKL from 1931 -- Spurzem 12:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Großer Weitschartenkopf on the Reiter Alm in the Berchtesgaden Alps --Milseburg 12:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit cross on the Großer Weitschartenkopf on the Reiter Alm in the Berchtesgaden Alps --Milseburg 12:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination juvenile vulpes in Ukraine. By User:Byrdyak --Anntinomy 11:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sus scrofa. By User:Byrdyak --Anntinomy 11:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Theater in Baden-Baden, Germany. --Till.niermann 11:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Christ over the door of St Bridget's Church, West Kirby Rodhullandemu 10:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deposition in the Santa Maria del Carmine church in Brescia . --Moroder 08:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 09:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pentecost and Virgin's coronation chapel in the Santa Maria del Carmine church in Brescia. --Moroder 08:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 09:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination March of Ukraine's Defenders on Independence Day in Kyiv, 2019 208 --Ввласенко 08:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination March of Ukraine's Defenders on Independence Day in Kyiv, 2019 298 --Ввласенко 08:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome of Sala dos Brasões, Palácio Nacional, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palácio Nacional, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quinta da Regaleira, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dining room of Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Frojach and Sankt Martin in Carinthia , the Drau --Michielverbeek 07:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosegg in Carinthia, church: die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Michael --Michielverbeek 07:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Velden am Wörthersee in Carinthia, the Wörthersee --Michielverbeek 07:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Auen and Dellach in Carinthia, the Wörthersee --Michielverbeek 07:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Armagh Zone Substation, Christchurch --Podzemnik 07:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of the building at 200 Armagh Street, Christchurch --Podzemnik 07:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Latimer Square, Christchurch --Podzemnik 07:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Willows on Worcester, Christchurch --Podzemnik 07:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferrari 250 GT Lusso (1963) at the mountain race in Würgau 2019 --Ermell 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DKW F1 Monoposto (1930) at the mountain race in Würgau 2019 --Ermell 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daimler Benz 300 SL (1959) at the mountain race in Würgau 2019 --Ermell 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Austin 7 (1936) at the mountain race in Würgau 2019 --Ermell 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Austin Healey MK II (1962) at the mountain race in Würgau 2019 --Ermell 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna.
    --Famberhorst 06:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
    --Famberhorst 06:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rained out "Russula amoenolens". In decay.
    --Famberhorst 06:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Prümaran Prui via Alp Laret to Ftan. View of the surrounding mountains.
    --Famberhorst 06:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mes chaussures de sécurité. --Benoît Prieur 06:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Der Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich) mit über 120 Kelleranlagen und der weithin sichtbaren Rochuskapelle. --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Braiding stream on glacier bottom.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Erosion field along the mountain path.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sent (German: Sins ) a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden Wooden door of the Reformierte Kirche Sent.(Detail)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination in the Chiesa di San Gaetano church in Brescia. --Moroder 05:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "Old Keep" and parts of the northern first and middle ring walls, Château de Peyrepertuse --Llez 05:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of the northern middle ring wall, Château de Peyrepertuse --Llez 05:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of the northern middle ring wall with view on the Corbières Massif, Château de Peyrepertuse, France --Llez 05:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "Old Keep", Château de Peyrepertuse, France --Llez 05:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifixion group at the parish church Saints Philip and James in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porch at the parish church Saints Philip and James in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial at the porch at the parish church Saints Philip and James in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco of Saint Christopher at the parish church Saints Philip and James in Köstenberg, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SP-LID (aircraft). By User:Julian Herzog --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SP-LID (aircraft). By User:Julian Herzog --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pustovity windmill. By User:SNCH --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pustovity windmill. By User:SNCH --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pustovity windmill. By User:SNCH --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity monument in Henryków 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity monument in Henryków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tour of Austria, 2nd stage - The main field at the transit in Dreistetten. --Steindy 00:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tour of Austria, 2nd stage - The main field at the transit in Dreistetten. --Steindy 00:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reichliche Apfelernte in Südtirol, Italien.--Fischer.H 18:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please, add more specific categories --Poco a poco 19:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
     Done--Fischer.H 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
     Support Thanks --Poco a poco 08:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Les champions blancs à la Forêt Sacrée de Kpassè --Adoscam 10:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unidentified species are no use in the Commons. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A file photo representing the column statue of yogendra malla from the arena of Patan Durbar Square. By User:Sunil kawan --Biplab Anand 08:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Perspective issues. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Park wall in Służejów --Jacek Halicki 01:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A statue of the crucifixion, in the Cimetero Monumentale de Milan. --GrandCelinien 20:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient DOF and pretty casual composition. Sorry --Moroder 09:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument of Emperor Joseph II. at Sparkassenpark St. Pölten, Austria. --GT1976 18:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Not very sharp. sosrry --Moroder 17:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marmota bobak in Ukraine By User:Balkhovitin --Anntinomy 16:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Festlbeilstein/Karlspitz south face, Hochschwab (Styria) --Clemens Stockner 13:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not an interesting composition, but the quality is for me good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 08:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karlhochkogel seen from the southwest, Hochschwab (Styria) --Clemens Stockner 13:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hamburg-Eissendorf, Adolf-von-Elm-Hof 4, part of protected ensemble Adolf-von-Elm-Hof/Mehringweg --KaiBorgeest 22:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Noccaea minima --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose underexposed. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination False helleborine (Veratrum album) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 08:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sainte Colombe church of Chevilly-Larue in Val-de-Marne department, France. --Chabe01 11:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky looks very edited and should perhaps be smoothed and the verticals corrected. --Ermell 17:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace and park in Kachanivka, Ichnia Raion, Chernhiv Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Ekaterina Polischuk --Antanana 12:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Beautiful! But parts of the building are overexposed, the sky looks artificial and there are some prominent CAs. --Aristeas 13:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose overexposed. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:MarusyaSlobozhan_Spitz3.jpg

• Nomination Spits Mountain near Chornohora Range by User:Marusya Slobozhan --Anntinomy 13:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Overprocessed: WB off, too golden light for 31. may at 17:24 --EV Raudtee 15:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Support Looking at the grass I wouldn't say that the WB is incorrect overall. And the time set in camera is no indication of the actual time of the day: it needs to be set, corrected from time to time, and some people simply forget to do it. Methinks that the image has something to it that makes it unusual and thus interesting. --Stoxastikos 17:40, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition and coloring are not succeeded here. Looks like the photo has burnt on the top. --Milseburg 08:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg--Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 22:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Constantia_Winelands_Cultural_Landscape._Buitenverwachting_and_Vineyards.jpg

• Nomination Groot Constantia. By User:Chris Snelling --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Oppose Quite a big dustspot on the right corner --Podzemnik 02:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose First should the dust spot removed. --Steindy 01:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_9.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality --Llez 05:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Problematic sky + barrel distortion. --Tsungam 07:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tsungam - lines going diagonally up to the left in the sky to the left of the roof and to the right in the sky to the right of the roof, similarly visible in the shadows below the roof. -- Ikan Kekek 05:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A6226).jpg

• Nomination Aerobatic display by Patrulla Águila at ILA 2018 --MB-one 04:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Dust spot to remove. Looks a little underexposed? --Gyrostat 16:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Done --MB-one 17:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- Spurzem 21:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Wall_Clock,_c._1880,_probably_made_by_Escalier_de_Cristal,_Paris,_bronze_and_enamel_-_Art_Institute_of_Chicago_-_DSC09884.JPG

• Nomination Clock in the Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 01:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:43, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Very noised --George Chernilevsky 16:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per George. -- Ikan Kekek 06:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   -- George Chernilevsky 23:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hot_Water_Pot,_16th_century,_Japan,_lacquer_on_wood_-_Art_Institute_of_Chicago_-_DSC00197.JPG

• Nomination Japanese art in the Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 01:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:43, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Very noised --George Chernilevsky 16:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Like George said, background is too noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 06:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   -- George Chernilevsky 23:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Haus_der_Kulturen_der_Welt_Berlin_2564_by_T_meltzer.jpg

• Nomination Berlin Congress Hall / Haus der Kulturen der Welt. By new user User:T meltzer from Wiki loves Monuments 2019, he agreed with the nomination. --Emha 09:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
• It looks very nice but also appears downsized - is there a higher resolution available? Also, the file name could be a bit more descriptive.--Peulle 09:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Done I renamed it. It fully meets our QI criteria. Emha 09:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose It does not. Downsampling is not encouraged.--Peulle 21:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose - I think this is way too small for QI for this kind of motif in 2019. If you disagree, feel free to reset the status to "Discuss". -- Ikan Kekek 16:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry, if you think the criteria for QI must be changed you should discuss this on the criteria's talk page. This foto has > 2MP and fully meets all the other QI criteria, too IMHO. --Emha 14:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

• Which criterion states that an image that's just above the minimum size can't be opposed as too small for the kind of motif it displays? You can hardly force me to vote for your photo, so you might want to consider taking another tack. -- Ikan Kekek 07:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Please read Commons:Image guidelines. Citation from there: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file.". -- George Chernilevsky 09:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Strong downsampled. The Pentax K-7 camera can take pictures with a resolution of 14.5 megapixels. --George Chernilevsky 09:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan Kekek --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment So none of these IMHO excellent fotos has a chance of getting honoured in the QI-system? I find that very disappointing. The QI criterias should be changed, so that no one gets false hopes. Of course I had checked before the nomination whether the photo is larger than 2 MP. And I thought this was mainly about the photographic motif. Sad, --Emha 10:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Two Mpix is a hard limit to avoid images in stamp size. It is not intended to encourage photographers to scale down all their images to two Mpix or just a little larger. The guidelines say: Higher resolution can be demanded for easy to take images. My personal interpretation is: Downscaling is allowed in a meaningful manner. Examples are: Very low light situations with moving objects, where the use of a tripod doesn't help. Very fast moving objects, where shortest exposure times are necessary while the aperture needs to be wide open. Macro photography with moving Objects, where focus stacking is impossible. Perspective corrections, which go beyond a small measure, actually always require a certain downscaling, because the "stretched out" parts of the image always appear blurred through interpolation. Also for portraits of people in live situations without the use of professional make-up technique, make-up artist, type consultant and sophisticated portrait lighting I consider downscaling completely acceptable: You don't necessarily have to be able to count every pimple and every nose hair... Further exceptions to the ban on downscaling are conceivable. But it should always remain balanced. A QI-Bapperl for a picture from a camera with 12, 16, 50 MPixels, which was shrunk to just over two MPixels, I do not consider fair to the photographers, who tear their ass here regularly, in order to deliver the technically best possible quality. --Smial 14:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:South_African_Airways_A340-300_ZS-SXE.jpg

• Nomination ZS-SXE (aircraft). By User:Jovianeye --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree, registration and details looks unsharp. --Gyrostat 16:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support We should not overdo it with the demands. In my opinion, the picture is sharp enough for QI. -- Spurzem 09:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

@Andrew J.Kurbiko: But the color balance should be better. ;-) You understand, what I mean? -- Spurzem 12:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but I can not change it by myself. Still hope its OK for QI. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hadako-tan.svg

• Nomination Drawing to illustrate the concept of hentai. (The rendered PNG kinda looks bad because of an RSVG bug but the original SVG looks good. By User:Niabot) --Masumrezarock100 00:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Oppose Sorry! Good work, but not useful for Wikipedia (see discription).. --Steindy 12:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  Usefullnes for Wikipedia is no QI criteria. --MB-one 17:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

• @Steindy I'd suggest you take time to read our image guideliness. Images from Commons don't have to be useful for Wikipedia to become QI or FP. --Podzemnik 08:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Seems like good quality to me, and not only is usefulness for Wikipedia not a criterion; it's also quite foolish to assume a photo couldn't possibly be used in a Wikipedia article. -- Ikan Kekek 07:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose composition (cut at the bottom too tight) isn´t convincing me. --Milseburg 11:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I think its ok --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_40.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Please check the verticals. --Ermell 07:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  Frage: I do not see a vertical that is not right. Which do you mean? --Manfred Kuzel 12:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
  The left side. --Ermell 07:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
   Done
  New version uploaded.--Manfred Kuzel 16:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  You should clone the objects in the top right corner out and the right side of the building is still not vertical. --Ermell 07:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  @Ermell: There are no objects in the top right corner. Please clear browser cache (Ctrl + F5)! --Manfred Kuzel 08:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. --Ermell 08:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
   Comment A rotation by 0.6° CCW and then cropping/removal of the object in the upper right corner would by the cherry on the cake. --Tsungam 08:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

 Question @Tsungam: where do you see an object in the upper right corner? Can you note it please? Maybe it helps to empty the browser cache once? --Steindy 22:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment The upper right corner is not hard to find. The small object should be cloned out.--Ermell 08:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  @Ermell: Once again:There are no objects in the top right corner. Please clear browser cache (Ctrl + F5)! --Manfred Kuzel 13:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Ermell, now I have found the little spot and removed it. --Steindy 00:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Looks alright to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support better. Thanks @Steindy: --Ermell 23:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Wey-X_Autonomous_Crossover_at_IAA_2019_IMG_0587.jpg

• Nomination Wey-X Autonomous Crossover at Frankfurt Motor Show 2019.--Alexander-93 09:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC))
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not understand why you cut the photos so close. A good picture also includes some environment. --Steindy 01:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Every part of the car is sharp so for me it is a QI. IMO the crops are well done --Michielverbeek 20:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --EV Raudtee 16:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Michiel. -- Ikan Kekek 07:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Smart_EQ_forfour_at_IAA_2019_IMG_0799.jpg

• Nomination Smart EQ forfour at Frankfurt Motor Show 2019.--Alexander-93 09:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not understand why you cut the photos so close. A good picture also includes some environment. --Steindy 01:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Acceptable. Colors and reflections look quite good, background is not as disturbing as in many other exhibition photos. --Smial 12:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Smial. --EV Raudtee 16:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Smial. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Skoda_Superb_III_iV_at_IAA_2019_IMG_0273.jpg

• Nomination Škoda Superb iV at Frankfurt Motor Show 2019.--Alexander-93 09:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not understand why you cut the photos so close. A good picture also includes some environment. --Steindy 01:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support This crop is not too tight, IMO. More environment would mean zooming out further, getting less of the details on the car in the frame.--Peulle 09:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• @Peulle: which details would you missing, if the photo has not 4.570 × 2.157 px, but therefore 4.800 x 2.400 px? The Canon EOS7d has a resolution of 5.184 × 3.456 px. --Steindy 12:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• What would be the point of including more background instead of focusing on the main subject? If the crops were cutting the sides of the car by millimetres, it would be too tight, but this one does have room on the sides.--Peulle 13:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• Does the car have a special paint finish that changes the colour so much depending on the incidence or intensity of light? For the time being, an  Oppose until this question is clarified. --Smial 12:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I'm not happy with the noise level on the car. --EV Raudtee 16:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_54_a.jpg

• Nomination Detail eines Objektes auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 16:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Sensor pattern on the black tower, repairable IMO. --Steindy 17:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
   Comment
  Danke für das Review!
  1., Allfällige Unreinheiten stammen sicherlich nicht vom Sensor, wie ein kürzlich vorgenommener Check bei Nikon ergeben hat.
  2., Ich sehe auf dem “Turm” nur die Struktur des geschmiedeten unlackierten Blechs. --Manfred Kuzel 05:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Ich hatte Ihnen die Fehler extra markiert. --Steindy 22:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  * Antwort: Und ich kann nur zum hundertsten Mal feststellen, daß ich (und andere Benutzer auch) die Fehler - auch wenn sie markiert sind - auf meinem Monitor nicht sehe !!! Und ich habe auch keine Erklärung dafür, woher sie kommen, nachdem Kamera und insbesondere Sensor OK sind. Jetzt versuche ich, die Originale der beanstandeten Fotos mit einer anderen Software zu bearbeiten und neu hochzuladen. --Manfred Kuzel 08:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)!

•  Done @Steindy: Edited with other software and uploaded new version. --Manfred Kuzel 11:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry Manfred. Not okay. --Steindy 19:32, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

• @Steindy: Dann ist es eindeutig die Struktur des Bleches. --Manfred Kuzel 05:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Manfred I would not write it if it were not there. I have a calibrated monitor and I can see in the two openings slightly rising strips to the right. From the sheet above it can not come, because there are the stripes vertically. But anyway, I have not given any contraindications anyway, so another user can decide. --Steindy 17:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  @Steindy: Kann ich Dich davon überzeugen, daß das die Blechstruktur ist, wenn ich Dir das Original im NEF-Format schicke? Schönen Tag und lG--Manfred Kuzel 06:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  Gerne! --Steindy 21:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Moroder 21:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)