Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 06 2020
-
- Nomination Forest at the street “Am Linnert”, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Construction site of the federal highway 67n near Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffito “Banane” (Thomas Baumgärtel, September 1, 2018) at the LWL-Museum für Kunst and Kultur, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Crystal Bivouac, West Coast Region --Podzemnik 04:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Statue of Simón Bolívar, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 04:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santa Bárbara, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 04:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santa Bárbara, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 04:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santa Bárbara, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 04:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santa Bárbara, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 04:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Epitaph from Virunum II (showing Achilles drags the slain Hector with his chariot through the dust) (CSIR II/4, 359) on the south wall of the pilgrimage church "Assumption Day", Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman stone relief showing a male servant with bar (CSIR II/3, 274), exposed at the south wall of the pilgrimage church the Assumption, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman stone relief with two couples, citizens of the Roman Empire, (CSIR II/2,161) of Virunum II cemetery on Zollfeld, exposed at the southern exterior wall of the parish church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head sculpture of a demon at the northern wall of the parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief with kantharos Arbor vitae (tree of life) motive and two panthers (CSIR II/5, 454) over the southern portal of the pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zhenetskyi Huk waterfall (2) -- George Chernilevsky 21:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg, near Stillhorner Weg 56 --KaiBorgeest 21:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front elevation of the former infirmary on Myrtle Street --Rodhullandemu 18:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 18:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LGBT pride flag in Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 19:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Voisin C28 Aérosport by User:Thesupermat. --Akela NDE 17:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 20:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaques in Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque in Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque in Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque of Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heracles and the Lernaean Hydra, Michaelertrakt, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 16:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 16:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heracles and Prometheus, Michaelertrakt, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 16:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heracles and Cerberus, Michaelertrakt, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 16:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hietzinger Church, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 16:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Gothic vault of the Saint Anna chapel in the Carmelite monastery church of the Annunciation, Hirschhorn (Neckar), Germany. --Aristeas 10:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination View of the church of the Sacred Heart in Pforzheim, Germany. It was not possible to get all verticals straight, very probably some of them are not perfectly vertical in reality. --Aristeas 10:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination LOOK Keo Blade Carbon clipless pedals --PetarM 08:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sheep in Telgruc-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Point of Pen-Hir and Tas de Pois in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Maison Podevigne de Grandval in Saint-Urcize, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Our Lady of Mount Carmel church in Salgues, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit in the St Bartholomew church in Villecomtal, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cascade du Devez in commune of Curieres, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thérèse of Lisieux, pilgrimage church Maria zu den Ketten, Zell am Harmersbach --Llez 07:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grimace over the door to the old pension office in Iphofen. Today Knauf Museum. --Ermell 07:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms above the door to the Old Pension Office in Iphofen. Today Knauf Museum. --Ermell 07:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Rathausportal in Iphofen --Ermell 07:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Iphofen --Ermell 07:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, I have also been in this town during one of my trips --Michielverbeek 07:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Lions on the entrance of Saint Michael church in the Monumental cemetery in Brescia. --Moroder 05:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Beautiful! There are quite some dust spots in the top-right corner, please remove them. And the columns are weird, sorry: they appear very curved. Of course I know there is the Entasis of columns, but this looks strange. Are these columns really that curved, or is there some distortion? --Aristeas 09:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the note. I'm afraid it is a problem of the lens (which is a pretty expensive lens!) which I'll have to check with the manufacturer --Moroder 13:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen. Biotope in the upland moor area.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 05:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen. Biotope in the upland moor area.
-
- Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Water feature along the route).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 05:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Water feature along the route).
-
-
- Nomination Crocothemis servilia --Vengolis 04:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brachydiplax chalybea --Vengolis 04:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neurothemis tullia --Vengolis 04:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marian column at St. John's Church, Billerbeck, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Johanneskirchplatz 2 to 7, Billerbeck, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Market Square, Memmingen, Germany --Poco a poco 08:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Volkswagen ID.3 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
IMO the DOF is too short. --Augustgeyler 18:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
The composition is rather poor. -- Spurzem 22:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Support If anything the DoF is too high and the compostion seems fine to me too --MB-one 12:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A bicycle attached to a trash can in Paris --Touam 13:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
The crop at the bottom is too tight. Could you please ad some space there? --Augustgeyler 18:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes I know but unfornutately I can't sorry. --Touam 19:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I am sorry, but in that case I have to decline due to compostion. --Augustgeyler 12:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Canterbury Region, South Island of New Zealand. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination A whole Mandelbrot set with Orbit Trap coloring --PantheraLeo1359531 20:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --GRDN711 03:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jefferson Trust Company, Hoboken. --King of Hearts 22:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
is there any use in nearly identical picures which bear the same title? --Virtual-Pano 00:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
The other one shows the side face better, while this one shows more of the facade. And per COM:IG: "There is no restriction on the number of similar quality images". --King of Hearts 21:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 19:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Asmodea Oaktree 20:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blick in die herbstliche Landschaft, vom Hambacher Schloßberg in die Rheinebene, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 18:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Very nice! IMHO it is leaning a bit to the left, I suggest to rotate it a little bit clockwise. --Aristeas 11:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Done --Fischer.H 14:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 10:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View over the Evasion Mont Blanc skiing resort, Saint-Gervais-les-Bains --MB-one 23:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pilot boat of the Turkish State Railways in the Bosphorus in Istanbul --MB-one 23:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination Plaines d'Abraham, Quebec ville --Wilfredor 22:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
artefacts around top of leftmost tree - very bright shadows enhancing the overexposed look --Virtual-Pano 22:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose 
Not done within a week. --XRay 09:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Assemblée nationale du Québec --Wilfredor 22:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
several dust specks around the tower plus artefacts to the right of it --Virtual-Pano 22:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Virtual-Pano: Done Thanks --Wilfredor 23:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
most of them are gone indeed, thanks - please take a look to left and right of the clock there are still specks and a smudge --Virtual-Pano 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
@Virtual-Pano: I uploaded another version, please, let me know if its ok now --Wilfredor 13:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
dust removed - smudge gone - but what happened to twigs at far right & sculptures on the roof left & right of the tower which were spot on in the first version? --Virtual-Pano 00:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Please could you be more specific? --Wilfredor 10:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Support the denoising had a negative impact - the first version undusted and desmudged works for me - excellent composition and the chosen colour scheme compliments the content quite nicely --Virtual-Pano 17:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 06:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cascade des Palanges in Foret des Palanges, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 17:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 06:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Group of ancient tombstones against the background of mountains: Eltyubyu, Chegemsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria --Александр Байдуков 17:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 06:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination A en:Pedestrian crossing at 36 and 38 rue des Grandes Pierres Couvertes at en:Chartres, France. --Touam 08:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, the image is noisy and not sharp enough. Perspective should be fixed. The composition looks like random too. --XRay 10:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kamnik (Main square - Glavni trg) --PetarM 07:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Left side leaning in and the house in the middle is leaning to the left --Poco a poco 09:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue Church, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 06:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BG Block Saltlake Durgapujo 2020 --Subhrajyoti07 03:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
over all good quality, but could you try noise reduction? --Tesla Delacroix 13:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Old Town Hall, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 13:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
The perspective looks unnatural (no 90° corner at the tower in the upper half) --Tesla Delacroix 13:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you expect to get as final result, could you add a note? --Poco a poco 20:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sheesh Mahal (the Palace of Mirrors), Amber Fort in Jaipur --Jakubhal 08:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment Nice but the cropped paintings above the arch in the foreground are a bit distracting --Moroder 08:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. Fixed --Jakubhal 16:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 05:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Sheesh Mahal (the Palace of Mirrors), Amber Fort in Jaipur --Jakubhal 08:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination In Avenue de la Libération enSaint-Étienne), France, the wind almost makes a garbage can fly. --Touam 06:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
It is slightly tilted cw. --Augustgeyler 06:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The former First Church of Christ, Scientist, is a historic Christian Science church building located at 700 22nd Street, Rock Island, Illinois. U.S.A. Designed by architect William C. Jones of Chicago in the Palladian style, it was built between 1914-1915. Part of the Broadway Historic District on the NRHP since August 14, 1998 HD is roughly bounded by 17th and 23rd Sts., 5th and 7th Aves., Lincoln Court, and 12th and 13th Aves., Rock Island.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Smallbones --Kzirkel 22:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review The image has quite a few issues: fringes, red on the left, green on the right, must be removed and verticals straightened. And please, shorten the text of the nomination. All those details should be in the description of the file. --Palauenc05 17:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Logo Biebrzańskiego Parku Narodowego. By User:Killerowski --Piotr Bart 13:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
The character shapes are a bit wobbly. Is that intended? --MB-one 22:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Słowiński Park Narodowy. By User:MARCIN N --Piotr Bart 13:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
I assume, the "beach" is supposed to touch the edge on the right. --MB-one 10:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross in Voletiny, Trutnov, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 10:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Exposure and sharpness is good, but I would suggest either a wider (including the whole railing) or tighter crop (focused on the crucufix). --MB-one 10:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Internet room at Seafarers' Club Duckdalben, Hamburg 2019 --MB-one 08:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Big table without legs, I also dont like the vertical lines. Sorry to say but imo it's not a good composition --Moroder 05:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 09:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
_-_Altstadt_-_Klosterkirche_-_St.-Anna-Kapelle_-_Gew%C3%B6lbe.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_08.jpg)
._31-08-2020._(actm.)_10.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
Consensual review edit
File:Rostral_column_South._Figure_of_the_sea_God.jpg edit
- Nomination The figure of the sea God at the southern Rostral column. Birzhevaya square, near the Palace bridge, Vasileostrovsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Please reduce the exposure correction. There is a strong halo between monument and sky. --Augustgeyler 06:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Im Fokus 23:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Strong halo effect by overdone exposure correction --Augustgeyler 10:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose No, the halo effect is too much. Rodhullandemu 10:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Question Where's the strong halo effect you all are seeing? -- Ikan Kekek 19:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Either side of the column. Rodhullandemu 22:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I marked them on the image. --Augustgeyler 11:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks, I see it now. -- Ikan Kekek 13:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose A good photo, of course, but the halo effect is too much, please reduce it. --Aristeas 12:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Declined --Augustgeyler 19:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Augustgeyler 19:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)File:Imambara_inside_the_Residency-Lucknow-Uttar_Pradesh-DSC_0001.jpg edit
- Nomination This is the ruins of a roofless Imambara inside the Residency in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. --Dey.sandip 17:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality; nice composition. --Mr.choppers 01:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Verticals to be straightened, see Image guidelines --Palauenc05 18:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support The symmetry makes it a good composition and a good depiction of the subject, maybe even likely better than if the perspectives were corrected IMO. In some case rules have to be broken, this is that kind of case. Christian Ferrer 09:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Too distorted and to tight crop below. -- Spurzem 10:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortion --Jakubhal 21:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 04:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Weak support with Christian Ferrer. --Augustgeyler 12:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Promoted --Augustgeyler 19:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 19:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)File:Mille_Miglia_2020_partenza_N_14_Lancia_Lambda_spider_Casaro_in_Viale_Venezia_a_Brescia.jpg edit
- Nomination Ready for departure at the Mille Miglia 93th edition 2020 number 14. --Moroder 04:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose main parts of the car are not in focus. --Augustgeyler 06:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- It does look a bit soft. Is the focus on the man in the background rather than the car?--Peulle 07:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Yes. The man is way sharper than the middle of the car. --Augustgeyler 10:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose That's what I thought as well. Missed shot, then.--Peulle 13:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Focus not perfectly on the car, but regarding the high resolution still acceptable and useable sharpness. --Smial 09:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The car should actually be a bit sharper. But what bothers me a lot more is the older man with the mask hanging down behind the car. The photographer would only have had to wait seconds for it to pass. -- Spurzem 16:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Just because the pixels are magnified 200% compared to a normal 12 MP image doesn't mean that we should hold it to a higher standard for DOF. -- King of Hearts 22:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Smial.--Ermell 10:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @King of Hearts, Smial, and Ermell: Excuse me, it is not about a higher standard. All I expect is that an important object of an image is taken in focus. This here was not. If I'd follow your argumentation we would get unbelievably unfair rules. For example: I am using a 12MP camera. But if I nominate an image taken with a 6MP camera it would have to be focused twice as good as my usual pictures. Really? – And please remember, officially we should accept even 2 MP images. They would have to be focused 12 times better than Moroder's nominations? --Augustgeyler 10:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: DOF is a function of the lens only, not the sensor. So if you see a 2 pixel wide blur on a 32 MP camera, it would be pretty apparent, but if you had used the same lens on a 2 MP camera, the blur would only be 0.5 pixel wide, which people might not notice. The point is that if we would accept an image taken with a particular lens on a 2 MP camera, we must not reject the same image taken with the same lens on a 32 MP camera, even if it appears unsharp at 100%. --King of Hearts 20:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Take a look at a 6.7 MP version of this image and tell me it doesn't deserve to become QI. Now imagine the photographer originally took this picture using a 6.7 MP camera. --King of Hearts 20:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for delivering that experiment. The problem is less visible, but still there and easy to see. We are nominating QI, which should be able to be used without down-sampling. If someone want's to print this in full scale, what do we tell him? We have to analyze nominations at 100% and not at any different level. --Augustgeyler 21:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: If you printed both the original and the downsampled version at the same print size, the original can only be better. Basically, if you tried to print this as a 80cm x 60cm poster, you would see a little bit of unsharpness on the car, but it would be mostly OK. If you tried to print the downsampled version at the same size, the entire image would be soft. But being able to be printed at 80cm x 60cm is not a requirement at QIC. If it looks good printed at 16cm x 12cm, that's good enough, regardless of whether it consists of 2 sharp megapixels or 100 unsharp megapixels. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- To follow your argumentation we would need a rule which clearly defines a standard- or reference view or printing size every images is reviewed on. For example: 4MP at 92 DPI. That would mean this image here might have been supportable. Every 2MP image not. But do you understand what I mean? Such a standard would be the only way to get something comparable. --Augustgeyler 10:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, different people have different interpretations. My interpretation is that a 2 MP image which is perfect at 100% cannot be rejected at QIC for having too little resolution. Therefore, the natural corollary is that any image which looks perfect when downsampled to 2 MP must also pass. --King of Hearts 17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wow! The image above is actually rejected for being downsized. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- The reason it should be rejected is not because it is downsampled (EXIF could be missing or faked, so comparing to the native resolution of the camera is not a reliable tell), but because the pixel-level detail is quite bad for a low-resolution (3.8 MP) image. If the image had 36 MP but the same quality of pixel-level detail, I would consider it QI. --King of Hearts 06:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
![[1]](https://previews.123rf.com/images/rognar/rognar1709/rognar170900063/87152272-castillo-de-bratislava-bratislavsky-hrad-en-bratislava-eslovaquia-hito-hist%C3%B3rico-de-la-ciudad.jpg){kind=link}
- Support per Smial and KoH. --Aristeas 12:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support I'm not too fond of the crop (why so much headroom?), but other than that a fine image. --MB-one 12:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 19:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 19:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)